User talk:Bgt968

Hello, Bgt968, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. ϢereSpielChequers 22:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Just to say well done for your recent work on creating Guatemalan and Salvadoran election articles! пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just a bit of helpful advice - when you talk about dates, use the word "on" rather than "in" - "in" is used for months and years only (e.g. "on 11 April 1966", "in April 1966" and "in 1966"). пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:12, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, English uses "," when writing thousands or millions - so it should be 233,000, not 233.000. I hope this doesn't seem like criticism - just trying to help! пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS - for formatting tips, see the changes I made to Salvadoran legislative election, 1966. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Great work on the PPP article. It could now be nominated for T:TDYK. However, could you double check the membership number 77,000? It would have made the PPP the largest Latin American communist party (in relation to total population of the country). --Soman (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Political Handbook of the World 1993. Pp. 637. “People's Party of Panama (Partido del Pueblo Panameno – PPP). Founded in 1930 as the Communist Party of Panama (Partido Comunistade Panama), the PPP adopted its present name in 1943. Although declared illegal in 1953, the party adopted a generally torrijista outlook , particularly on the Panama Canal issue, and subsequently was permitted to operate semipublicly. In 1979 it applied for formal recognition and, with some 77000 members, was easily able to demonstrate the required level of support”. The future catches up: selected writings of Ralph M. Goldman, V. 1. Ralph Morris Goldman. iUniverse, 2002. ISBN 0595228887, 9780595228881. Pp. 370. “The People's Party of Panama (PPP/Soviet), with a substantial number of members (77000), is the principal Marxist party. Panama has not had diplomatic...”

Hm. Perhaps the wording in the article could be rephrased into something like 'claimed a membership of 77,000'? I still find the numbers mind-boggling. --Soman (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bgt968, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Honduran зresidential election, 1980, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:B.Wind. This has been done because the page is a recently created article that that duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:B.Wind. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of B.Wind (talk · contribs) 06:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank for the expansion on the PSR article, --Soman (talk) 01:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are creating a series of election articles for Bolivia. For years where there are presidential and legislative elections held together (i.e. general elections), it is probably better to merge them into a single article (such as Zambian general election, 2001) - I'd start by changing the links in the election template to point at general elections. Number 57 19:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of other hints - don't use "the" in front of Bolivia (it's only for countries like The Gambia), and don't link dates. Cheers, Number 57 15:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this suggestion. It's perfectly standard English to just say "Bolivia held a parliamentary election on..." (note that election is singular here, and not plural. I realize that "The Bolivia" is a literal translation from Spanish, but it's not done in English. Let me know if I can help with anything. Happy editing! Zachlipton (talk) 22:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Bgt968! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]