User talk:BubbaDaAmogus

Hi BubbaDaAmogus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I’m sure coming! BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have un-done your move of "Butter lamb" to "Butter Lamb". Wikipedia uses "sentence casing" for article titles. Before you make a similar change, please review WP:TITLEFORMAT, particularly where it says, "The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized by default; otherwise, words are not capitalized unless they would be so in running text." Le Marteau (talk) 19:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hi :D ----Modern primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 20:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahahahaha. It's not meant to be funny, you sussy baka!BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an editor brought to my attention that you left drive-by reviews at Talk:1961 San Diego Chargers season/GA1 and Talk:1990 San Diego Chargers season/GA1. I have undone your promotions of these articles, as they were out of process. GAN reviewers are expected to conduct a thorough review of each article, to ensure it passes all of the good article criteria. Please do not do what you did again in the future. If you have questions, there are plenty of editors who can help you, but it is not ok to just promote an article immediately to GA without leaving any comments (and you will not be getting any credit for these reviews in the drive). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL currently.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vinoj. P. Selvam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vinoj. P. Selvam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed your edits on 2021 Cincinnati Bengals season and would like to make you aware of WP:LIVESCORES and the corresponding consensus discussion. Given that the Bengals game is over, there is no use reverting those edits, but please keep this in mind and help enforce it for future games/sporting events.

Take care Benjamin112 ☎ 01:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The BLP Barnstar
		For your work on Vinoj P Selvam SVcode(Talk) 20:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, my first barnstar, thanks! BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Madea Homecoming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wakanda Forever. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because they got Accidentally On Christmas in 5 Months Beginning The December 24 inside the Seda Hotel instead Log In Account end date To December 26 I going home instead to Villa Sabina they are lot of poor words instead use the Small Letters before they using period and stop in the Next one. they begin use the Big Letters using from the if you saying "unnecessary" or "poor words"

For Example : Pittsburgh Sports Lore and Elimination from possibility of reaching postseason

Thank You Mr BubbaDaAmogus. Andrei Kenshin (talk) 18:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Monday Night Football results (2010–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highmark Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BubbaDaAmogus,

I have closed your optional RfA candidate poll because there was a clear consensus among responders that you are still some way off being a suitable candidate for adminship. Do not be disheartened! Try to take to heart some of their pointers and, most importantly, keep working on the areas of the project you enjoy. Feel free to contact me with questions. Best and happy editing, Modussiccandi (talk) 15:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chris seriously needs to soften that rock hard trout. I spent all of Saturday in the WikiHospital being treated for infected scars and barely made it out in time for my birthday. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

😹 Don’t take it seriously. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, BubbaDaAmogus! --Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awww, thanks! BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 19:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing BubbaDaAmogus a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The imposter is sus. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🤣🤣🤣 It never gets old. Don’t worry, I’ll have enough WikiCake for everyone. FYI, it’s marble. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highmark Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fellow *eligible!* Wikipedians,

Last week, I logged into Wikipedia only to find a banner saying "Vote in the Board of Trustees elections!" What did I do, I'll tell you. I checked my eligibility (* I was eligible!*) and voted. It's that simple, you can do it too! Just check your eligibility, vote, and that's it! We have to stand up and make our opinions heard. We only have until the 6th to do it. Follow us as an example and vote in the election. Thank you very much. I'm BubbaDaAmogus, and I approve this message. (I'm not running)

BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 17:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear World,

Today, it happened. The moment her enemies have been waiting for and others hoping against for 70 years.

Queen Elizabeth II is dead.

 At first, chills ran down my back. Really? How? I just couldn't apprehend it. She's been the Queen of England all my life.

It's too hard to apprehend for others, I know.

Thoughts and prayers with her. RIP

BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 19:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi BubbaDaAmogus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I hope you are celebrating after the Bengals' loss. I'm going for the Eagles.. what are your thoughts and who are you going for the Super Bowl? Tails Wx 13:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles all the way, and Eli Apple deserves to get owned. A friend told me about this guy who correctly predicted every Super Bowl since 50. And he said the Eagles would win this year. Best part is, though, that he predicted US to win Super Bowl 58. I just pray to God that we don't get done dirty again.

-B D A *Bills 🤝 Chiefs

Roasting Eli Apple, enjoy Cancun, walking L!* BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm understanding is that you are going for the Eagles? Hurts and Goedert? Gainwell and Scott? And even throw in Sanders. Tails Wx 14:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yup! BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 16:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good. Unfortunately, my friends are rivalling against me and going for the Chiefs instead, but I'm going to argue that the Chiefs traded Tyreek Hill, which pretty much was a blow to their WRs, and that's why they almost lost to the Bengals IMO. I'm blaming it on Joseph Ossai for Bengals' loss. I really wanted the Bengals vs the Eagles, but now, looks like the Eagles will win ;) Tails Wx 16:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really wanted Bengals-Niners. Darn, Purdy went out sad. By the way, I'm editing the 2022 Bills Pro Bowl selections on the 2022 Bills page and on the Pro Bowl page. Do you think you can add the proper notations for the 2022 Bills page once I'm done? Thanks.

-B D A *Ohio if it wasn't cursed: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTMkHmkWVy3mMMqYQmzo1dl74OdcydiIoRSoHJi6ijB&s* BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you already added the notations? Tails Wx 17:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, now I think I don't have to add notations, I don't know about it. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then. I've got two things on my NFL list: the Eagles winning the Super Bowl and the Bears owning the No. 1 pick :) Tails Wx 21:46, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just watch out for a Justin Fields trade, personally, I think he looks good enough in a Bears jersey, and in nothing else. (We don't even want him) BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No-I don't want a Justin Fields trade :( Maybe one more season until his contract expires in 2024. Tails Wx 13:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Me, personally, I would keep him for as long as possible. He's going to be a crucial piece of the team in the future, he's the one guy holding up the whole offense right now. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Looks like the Bears need some improvement on the defense, and they probably need redemption on the Roquan Smith trade. Texans are a different story. Probably need Bryce Young by now. Tails Wx 13:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Texans definitely need to make a good pick or two to fill in the QB position, and maybe invest in some new receivers. But this year, they really need to start working on that defense. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's why they've gone 3-13-1. They even beat the Colts, thanks to Davis Mills, although Mills had 3 INT and the Colts' Ehlinger had 2 and 2 TD passes and INTs. Ever since J.J. Watt's departure, the Texans gone downhill. Tails Wx 17:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True, now watch the Cardinals follow in the same footsteps in 2023 after Watt's retirement. Hope Kliff Kingsbury is enjoying his Thailand getaway. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. At least they've got Kyler Murray! Tails Wx 18:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in, but this type of conversation/discussion isn't allowed per WP:NOTFORUM. Pinging @Tails Wx as well. Thanks. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I had known about WP:NOTFORUM, but I guess we've taken this a bit too far. Thanks for the heads-up, Engr. Smitty! Tails Wx 11:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this was really stretched. Btw, one last word here, Deflaty is gone for good. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing BubbaDaAmogus a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   interstatefive  00:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, thanks! BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 13:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what was wrong with the edit summary? I usually just put my reactions in it. Also, that was just the 2nd time EVER (and in the last week) that I maxed out the edit summary with a long yell. I can stop doing it, but could you possibly explain what was so disruptive about it? It's not like anyone ever looks at edit summaries.

BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries are not for reactions; they are for making a useful description of the edit you are making. In addition to the two "yells," stuff like this is not helpful either. Page patrollers use edit summaries extensively, and we don't need crap filling up those logs. Don't do it again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I can kick the habit right now. All this time I forgot the true meaning of the edit summary, but now that you explain it, I think I can make something more professional. I'm pretty young, so my brain makes some radical decisions. Alas, another lesson learned for me. I'm going to go back to my stuff. BubbaDaAmogus (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Note that "Multiple independent interviews with Anand Kattu, 2018-2023" is not sufficient as a source. Phrases such as "had a burning desire to expand", are not neutral, especially when the source makes no such claim.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alibaba Kebab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BubbaDaAmogus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alibaba Kebab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BubbaDaAmogus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alibaba Kebab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The restaurant's website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alibaba Kebab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BubbaDaAmogus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alibaba Kebab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]