User talk:anlztrk

Hello, Anlztrk! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kimse (talk) 02:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Would you please read why people keep reverting you? — kwami (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	In recognition of your first 1,000 edits to Wikipedia articles. Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...Just for context, I work at the Wikimedia Foundation, but I've been a Wikipedian since 2006. We just started looking about who completed their 1,000th edit to Wikipedia, and today we saw you made yours very recently. Thanks for contributing! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Mehmet Ekici does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I see that you have added "Altaic" in every language template for the Turkic languages. "Altaic" must always be followed in parentheses by the word "(controversial)". Please make this addition to all the pages where you have left that off. Thank you. --Taivo (talk) 23:25, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the question mark after the word "Altaic" made it clear that the classification is controversial. Correct me if I'm wrong. — amateur (talk) 23:30, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the question mark has been acceptable within the cladistic table, but we've agreed to only show Altaic for the families and their eponymous languages. This parallels other language-family proposals, where we note them in their constituent families, but not in every language within those families. The exception for the eponymous languages in this case is to head off chronic additions because Turkish, Mongolian, Korean, and Japanese are so extremely well known. — kwami (talk) 22:02, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Would you please help me to see this unicode letters? I've tried several browsers without success.. Thank you for your reply. Sbasturk (talk) 23:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you need a compatible font, such as one of the ones found here. amateur (talk) 02:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you that helped. Sbasturk (talk) 19:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	You are cordially invited to join WikiProject Eurovision!
	You appear to be someone that may be interested in joining WikiProject Eurovision. Please accept this formal invitation from a current member of the project. We offer a place for you to connect with users who also like Eurovision and facilitate team work in the development of Eurovision articles.
	If you decide to join the project, please add your name to this list, and add the project talk page to your watchlist.
	I hope you accept! - Wes Mᴥuse 06:40, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Sorry to be a pain, but I've had to revert your change on Turkvision 2013, again. When song titles are written, we avoid adding letters such as Ə in Sənsiz. The schwa symbol needs to be converted into a "common" letter that is found on most standard Latin A-Z keyboards. This is because the majority of viewers do not have a button with the schwa "Ə" symbol, thus we need to accommodate everyone. This is why the Azeri spelling of the song title is shown in parenthesis. Wes Mᴥuse 07:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Turkish letters Ç, Ğ, İ, Ö, Ş, Ü are not found in most of the standart keyboards either, so why not convert these letters into more "common" letters too, then?

Also why was the letter used insted of Ə was U, opposed to more sensible choices like E or A? amateur (talk) 07:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The other letters get used in song titles, as these some how self-convert in the Wiki-search tab. However the schwa does not. ProjectEurovision have always tried to avoid using symbols where possible. As for U and not E or A, when I made the change, I was not sure of the guttural sound that schwa made, so I opted for the one that sounded closest. If E or A are more correct, then feel free to change it to those. Wes Mᴥuse 07:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did in fact change the U to E, only for you to change it back to U and tell me I was wrong. amateur (talk) 07:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you changed it back to Ə not e. And from what else I gather, it is not just ProjectEurovision that has to use standardized Romanization. It is also a manual of style guidance, see MOS:FOREIGN, and MOS:Ety. Wes Mᴥuse 07:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My eyes must be playing tricks on me, as I swear when I looked it shown you had reverted it back to Ə not e. Anyhow, I've self-reverted my action and gone back to how you fixed it using the e. Wes Mᴥuse 07:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The manuals you refer to deal with non-Latin scripts. amateur (talk) 07:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you check out Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest#Contestants, you will see the nonstandard characters Þ and Ð are used there. amateur (talk) 07:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if you look at Turkey in the Eurovision Song Contest#Contestants, ProjectEurovision do not use the schwa, even though some of the song titles used the letter. It's just one of those thing, unfortunately. Wes Mᴥuse 07:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that the letter schwa isn't part of the Turkish alphabet? amateur (talk) 07:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've read more into the links I provided above. MOS:Ety is in fact a "Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)" guidance. It states that the use of diacritics are allowed (such as á é í ó ú). However as the schwa is not a diacritic then its Anglicise/Romanised equivalent should be used, with the other language version is parenthesis. If you notice on the Turkvision article, even the Russian entries use the Anglicised version first, and the foreign version in parenthesis. And this has been done on every article related to Project Eurovision in its 10-year history. Wes Mᴥuse 07:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This still doesn't explain why thorn is allowed. amateur (talk) 07:45, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it doesn't explain why thorn is used. But I have worked out why schwa cannot be used. If you notice at MOS:Ety is states not to use Cyrillic text. The letter schwa is Cyrillic, see Schwa (Cyrillic). Perhaps the letter thorn is allowed for unknown reasons. Although saying that, on more recent Eurovision articles the thorn has been replaced with an Anglicised letter. Maybe the earlier ones have not been converted yet? For example, Eyþór Ingi Gunnlaugsson is enlisted as Eythor Ingi on ESC 2013 article. Wes Mᴥuse 07:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there is a letter in the same shape in the Cyrillic script does not make schwa a Cyrillic letter. By that logic, A, B, C, E, H, I, J, K, M, O, P, S, T, X and Y are Cyrillic letters as well. amateur (talk) 07:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand, names of people who are known enough in the English-speaking world with an Anglicized name are converted. But I'm not sure on that one. amateur (talk) 07:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now you're just getting picky, and I'd rather not get into an argument with you over a letter. Just let it drop. The letter schwa has never been used before on articles under the scope of ProjectEurovision, and the project has been around longer than you and I have been members of Wikipedia. And I very much doubt the decision to start using schwa would gain huge support overnight. So let's just leave things as they are, seeing as they are working perfectly so far. Wes Mᴥuse 08:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there is more to this that is not explained on Wikipedia. Both Leyla Əliyeva and Leyla Əliyeva (presenter) redirect to Leyla Aliyeva and Leyla Aliyeva (presenter) respectively. They don't even use the schwa. Whatever the Wikipedian rules is, we are obviously not suppose to be using the schwa in written text. Although by the looks of it we're to redirect an article that would use the schwa to the Anglicised version. Wes Mᴥuse 08:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Öz tagdyryň kolunda means Your destiny in someones hands, it's wrong, the correct is Öz tagdyryň koluňda it means your destiny in your hands. Please don't change the word koluňda(correct) to kolunda(wrong). I'm a native kyrgyz speaker. --158.181.181.9 (talk) 11:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the pages were you envisioning becoming the Primary Topic? None are obviously such to me, and without a primary, the disambig generally should stay at the primary name. - TexasAndroid (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for editing the Uzbek language article. But is the source you cited credible enough for us to claim that U+02BB should be used? I still haven't come across any official guidance on what characters should be used while writing Uzbek in the Latin script. So, I'm very glad you've found a source, however reliable and authoritative it is! Nataev ^talk 09:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the fact that the numerous instances of the Uzbek characters on the Unicode website overwhelmingly using U+02BB (and never U+2018), there is also the general rule that the characters like U+2018 are supposed to be used as punctuation marks, and they are handled by software that way. That makes using U+2018 problematic, because word processors and some browsers like Firefox treat the letter Oʻ in the word O‘zbekiston, for example, as if it was the word boundary. The modifier letter turned comma (which isn't called ʻOkina in Unicode suggesting it's a general character that can be used in other languages than Hawaiian) and modifier letter apostrophe are treated as letters within the word as they are supposed to be. The Uzbek government may or may not be aware of this, but that is irrelevant at this point. – amateur (talk) 17:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. If you remember, a while ago when we discussed this issue you disagreed with me when I said U+02BB should be used. :) I'm glad to hear now we're on the same page. You're right to point out that the symbol shouldn't be called the okina. But I have no idea how I can translate "modifier letter turned comma" into Uzbek. Does the phrase mean "a comma that's been turned into a modifier letter"? Nataev ^talk 16:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It means "a modifier letter that is shaped like a turned comma", actually. – amateur (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop warring? There are guidelines to follow. Read WP:NOTBROKEN carefully. Thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 10:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one who's warring by insisting on using a wrong spelling. – amateur (talk) 11:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a wrong spelling. This is English Wikipedia. You're violating a guideline that was reached by consensus among a number of editors. Change the guideline first by discussing it and then you're free to do what you're trying to do.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 11:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a wrong spelling and I'm not violating a guideline because there is reason to prefer to have the correct spelling "Chișinău" rather than the erroneous one, Chişinău displayed on the article. – amateur (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision Cup EuroCup News Dear Project Member The winner of the second Project Eurovision Cup is Moldova98, who achieved a score of 54 points. Androptrnt finished in second place once again with 40 points, and Sims2aholic8 in third with 16 points. The third edition has begun and will run from 1 July to 30 September, allowing participants a reasonable amount of time to have their articles which they may have nominated for GA or FA status, to be reviewed. The aim of the competition is to help improve many of the articles within Project Eurovision that would have been otherwise left neglected, by carrying out as many objectives as possible. The more objectives you do, the more points you will earn. So have you got what it takes to be crowned winner of the next Project Eurovision Cup? Project members who wish to participate can now register or de-register at any time by clicking here. The Project Cup judges, Wesley Mouse and CT Cooper, wish you all the best of luck.

This notice was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 13:57, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , you have deleted The Walls of Diyarbakır from the List of World Heritage Sites in Turkey (Tentative list). Because Diyarbakır Fortress and Hevsel Gardens Cultural Landscape has entered the main list. Thanks. However I have doubts about it. For one thing their project numbers are different; 1402 for the Diyarbakır walls and 1488 for the Fortress. Besides both sites still appear in the official pages of UNESCO. [1] and [2]. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:58, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While it can be argued that it's not the best source, the Turkish Wikipedia seems to think that it's the same site. – amateur (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 47 ← Headlines • Can self-motivation help us work together more collaboratively? • More websites banned by Project Eurovision. • Sweden wins Eurovision 2015. • Article improvements for EuroCup participants. • Unassessed articles on the increase again.	At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows: Number of articles ► 6175 Unassessed articles ► 31 Good articles ► 24 A-class articles ► 1 Feature articles ► 3 Number of members ► 100
• HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 16:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parthian language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lexical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FIFA Manager 13 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FIFA-Manager-11-Front-Cover-48559.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FenerbahçeÜlkerLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Şuncă. Since you had some involvement with the Şuncă redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amateur55. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amateur55. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently changed Help:IPA/Turkic dialects to Help:IPA/Oghuz languages. As you might see from the talk page discussion, I would rather see the IPA guide split up into its constituent languages. Your move is a step in the opposite direction and I don't see a relevant discussion showing you'd gotten a consensus for your move. If you could please either self-revert or, if you move it to Help:IPA/Turkish (a move proposal that I've put off for a long time), I could assist you in creating the relevant IPA help pages. — Ƶ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 22:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Anlztrk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20663 was submitted on Feb 18, 2018 17:27:20. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amateur55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amateur55. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amateur55, I saw your recent edit regarding the vowels of the Azerbaijani language. I saw that you undid my edit in that it was based on the South Azerbaijani dialect. What is your knowledge regarding the vowels in the Standard (North) Azerbaijani language? Are they any different from the vowels of the Southern dialect? Also, is the rounded mid vowel more open (as [œ]), or more closed (as [ø]) in the Northern dialect? I believe that the vowels from both the Southern and Standard (Northern) dialects should be displayed in order to differentiate the vowel pronunciations regarding the two dialects. Are they're also any sources regarding the grammar/pronunciation/phonology of the Standard (North) Azerbaijani language? Any information would be helpful. Thanks. Fdomanico51997 (talk) 23:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I have yet to see an academic study on the phonetic/acoustic qualities of North Azerbaijani vowels. At this point anything I say could be considered anecdotal, but I find the values stated on the Azerbaijani alphabet page to be accurate: [ɑ], [e], [æ], [ɯ], [ɪ], [ɔ], [œ], [u], [y]

I find especially [ɵ] for /œ/ to be extremely unlikely for North Azerbaijani, it's definitely a front vowel in the [ø̞] ~ [œ] range. – amateur (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or what about if there are any sources on the Baku Azerbaijani dialect? Those would be very helpful as well. Fdomanico51997 (talk) 01:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Anlztrk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #24498 was submitted on Mar 28, 2019 16:22:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

→ Issue 48 ← Headlines Duncan Laurence wins Eurovision 2019. Eight cities in the running to host Eurovision 2020. Jury voting inconsistencies at Eurovision 2019.
At the time of publication the project statistics were as follows
Number of articles	Unassessed articles	Good articles	A-class articles	Featured articles	Number of members
7263	33	54	1	5	109
• HOME • TALK • NEWSDESK • UNSUBSCRIBE • ARCHIVES • • Published by the Eurovision WikiProject •

Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:EfesPilsenSecondLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TaleWorlds logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 15:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Star TV logosu.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Turkish Cup logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SobeeLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Dotted and dotless I into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that requirement, sorry. It appears that you have provided the necessary attribution and no further action is necessary on my part? – anlztrk (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurdish–Turkish conflict (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdish–Turkish conflict (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Heanor (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ErciyesUniversity.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit on Gʻ. After your edit, it now links to 62 disambiguation pages. Can you solve them ASAP? Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 15:09, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't though? Not any that I can find, at least?

– anlztrk (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquake, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to file a new move request, but don't use WP:MRV for rehashing old discussions. Best of luck. Red Slash 21:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision News Desk Shortcut WP:ESC/N Dear Eurovision Wikipedian, Our project pages have undergone a full color change and now resemble the Swedish flag . Content and design updates are taking place daily. The new Archive tab will make it easier to find and view just about all of our archived pages. It is a work in progress. Issue 49 of the newsletter is currently pending delivery. While we await that, you can now receive daily and/or weekly Eurovision news updates. Sign up below have a wonderful week. To receive a daily or weekly Eurovision news update please click on the appropriate button. Cordially, News Desk Editor-in-Chief Ktkvtsh (talk)

Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anlztrk,

Category redirects are not like article redirects, there is a different code/template used. Please look at the code on this page so that if you should need to create a category redirect in the future, you can use the correct formatting. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Provinces of Turkey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinop. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I noticed that you have moved the page title of Adana Demirspor's home, New Adana Stadium, to Adana Stadium. The Turkish Football Federation and UEFA sources also refer to its name as "New Adana Stadium". Don't we need to rethink and discuss this issue? :) Fatihoztrk950 (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Samsunspor sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Having done one invalid reversion of your edits, I hesitate to do another. So this time, I'll ask questions first and shoot afterwards.

I don't think that this edit is correct. Yes, the generic word 'trema' (as used in English, without an ⟨é⟩) needs to redirect to trema (disambiguation). But tréma (as used in French, with an ⟨é⟩) is unambiguous and invariably means a diaeresis. I really can't see anyone spelling it with an ⟨é⟩ accidentally. So I guess that the question is this: should we do what is strictly correct or what we think might be more educational?

It is a bit of an "angels dancing on the head of a pin" question, because usage of both is minuscule. So if you remain content with what you have done, I won't pursue it further. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point about the é. Yes, I guess the accented form being redirected to the unaccented Trema would be the best solution, as I can certainly see some people using it to be punctual. – anlztrk (talk | contribs) 17:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024–25 TFF First League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Göztepe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SüperLig-Logo (2024).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anlztrk. Thank you for your work on BGN/PCGN romanization of Uyghur. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add a mention of this in the target page with a good ref

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gridironfootball-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]