User talk:Anesleyp

If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page if the comments are constuctive.

This is Anesleyp's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1

Archives

Archived Talk Page #1

I have condensed and structured the article logically and according to Wikipedia's policies. I have included all of the relevant information you have provided. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, the majority of your additions to Chelsea Lately are colloquial and un-sourced.

In the future, please provide a valid reason before reverting edits without cause. This does not include "put[ting] back all te (sic) hard work i have made."

It may be useful for you to read this article before continuing to contribute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.124.91 (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ford Interceptor, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vossanova ^o< 14:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop readding the information to the article's introduction. It is mostly fluff that doesn't belong in the lead, and some of it is unsourced or doesn't support what is being said. Ophois (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The videos weren't taken off the internet, though. They are still available. Besides, half of the stuff you keep adding back is unsourced, so it must be removed by wikipedia policy. And doing a photo shoot for a new season is pretty irrelevant to the article. Ophois (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blanked your userpage as a blatant copyright violation of someone else's userpage. Please do not do this again. — neuro^(talk) 19:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not take barnstars like this when they have not been awarded to you. — neuro^(talk) 19:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or this, this, this, or many of the others that you have so shamelessly taken without earning. — neuro^(talk) 19:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's already been taken to the talk page as far as I know, and we are talking about it there. Thanks! Mathewignash (talk) 21:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do consider myself retired, but I am making gnomeish edits and keeping an eye on the articles I have made or updated on my watchlist. I haven't though done any updating since going into retirement. I know that isn't the definition of retirement, but I don't have anyone to take over watching the articles I watch yet. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 21:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop bringing back the speculation in Ford Interceptor. I suggest reading the guideline "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". The "speculation" section is just that - unfounded rumors. Anything with "possibly" in it should not even be considered for the page, otherwise you are just writing in what you think the truth should be. --Vossanova ^o< 13:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.atpictures.com/display.php?img=13713&return=%2Fmarlon-wayans%2F. As a copyright violation, File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the File:Kendra-show-1.jpg image from your userpage as fairuse images should not be used in userspace. I have been called on the carpet for that one before. Please only use images you have created in userspace. If you have any questions, message me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 22:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you copy my user page, only changing my name? It just doesn't make sense. Please come up with your own content to describe yourself. --Vossanova ^o< 14:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I see that various sections of your userpage are still unattributed copies of other users' userpages, even after you were warned about this a month ago at #Userpage. It appears that you selectively copied barnstars and personal, descriptive text from no less than five distinct users to create your userpage. This is a violation of those users' copyrights. I will be removing the improperly copied portions of your userpage. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Re-use of text for information about properly reusing text created by others, and refrain from copying others' content without proper attribution. As Vossanova said above, you should come up with your own content to describe yourself; it is difficult to interpret this as anything other than deliberate misrepresentation. Maralia (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. Please explain yourself. Take for example this edit. It is easy to check that you have never contributed to any of the articles you listed, so what is the point of publishing such a blatant lie? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently reviewed the edit history for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. It appears that you and Anesleyp are "fighting" (or conflict resolving) through the use of edit summaries. Conflicts between two users, even when pertaining to edit conflicts, should not be discussed in the edit summaries. If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the articles talk page. It even states right here to...

Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself.

If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the article's talk page. And, if you so choose, notify the User, whom you are in conflict with, that you are discussing the matter on the article's talk page. But don't use the edit summary box as a way to discuss something between two users. THAT'S WHY THEY MADE USER TALK PAGES. GO FIGURE!!! ⊥m93 ^talk. 00:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. I have in fact notified the other user.
2. It is a standard practice for talk messages to be grouped together. What I mean by this is... If a message was left on your user talk page, reply there. If you left a message on my talk page, I will reply there. It keeps things organized. But I started this message here, so let's keep it here; for I am watching it.
3. I'm glad you actually asked me how to do something from my pages, rather than just take it like you have in the past; something I've asked another admin about. This admin may or may not do anything about it; it's up to him.

How To Use Same Status Box:
1. Create a new page in your userspace. Create it as User:Anesleyp/StatusTemplate

2. Copy this to that page:

'''<div style="border: 1px solid black; background: white; float: right; position: relative; top: -30px; padding: 5px"> User:Aneslyp is [[User:Anesleyp/Status|currently]]: {{ #switch: {{{1}}} | in=<span style="color: green;">ONLINE</span> | busy=<span style="color: orange;">ONLINE BUT WORKING | out=<span style="color: red;">OFFLINE</span> }} </div>'''

3. Create another page. User:Anesleyp/Status. On this page, place: {{User:Tm93/StatusTemplate|out}}. This is where you change your status. You can change it to in, busy, or out.

4. Then place the following wherever you want to place it. {{User:Anesleyp/Status}}

• To change the status click the link that says currently and edit the page.

Also. I was very tired while typing this, so I have made mistakes. Just a little tip for in the future: instead of taking someone's work by copying it without permission or asking them how they did some cool editing thing to add to your page, try using wikipedia's search. It is how you will find almost anything you're looking for... if you look hard enough. ⊥m93 ^talk. 02:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're not aware of it (despite me having notified you in the edit summary), I have started a discussion here to resolve this issue you're having with my statement about Transformers being a trilogy. --uKER (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two things: First, your reason of "im right" is not enough to go undoing a user's edits. Unfortunately, you do not work for Michael Bay, and because of this you are not privvy to such information such as the existence, or lack of, a fourth movie in the series. Secondly, your warning of a user for reverting your baseless information is also out of line, and abuses rules of Wikipedia, Keeping a Cool Head, and Discussing the issue in the talk page rather than the edit summaries. Please stop reverting the edit. Gpia7r (talk) 14:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 15:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Um... dude. look at the edit history (here). He hasn't done but maybe one edit on that current history list. If he/she has and it's was so long ago that it's on the next page of the edit history log... well you should have notified them earlier. But if in fact I am wrong, and you have (BUT IT WAS SO FAR BACK THE HISTORY LOG DOES'NT CONTAIN IT ON THE FIRST PAGE); just remember that you're not supposed to revert an article 3 times within 24 hours. If you disagree with the content, you're supposed to place the appropriate tag and then discuss it on the talk page. ⊥m93 ^talk. 22:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What? I don't know about you, but I see four edits by Anesleyp in the first page dated October 12, 11, 8 and 3. It's nowhere near violating the 3RR either, but it's not like he hasn't been there. --uKER (talk) 23:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a three EDIT rule. It's a three REVERT rule. ⊥m93 ^talk. 23:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And my bad. he has made edits. But two things. One its only within a 24 hour time period. Two it's a REVERT rule not EDIT rule. ⊥m93 ^talk. 23:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Until you purge your user page of inaccuracies and untruth, I shall continue to revert it. Why do you claim to have edited Conrad Hughes Hilton? Why have you put yourself in a bunch of categories and piped them to T-dot? What is your connection with Kansas, Michigan or Ohio? Please reply? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please point me to the edits which you claim to have made to the following:

• Kendra Wilkinson
• Ikki Twins
• Kendall Jenner
• Kylie Jenner
• Ramon Rodriguez
• Shia Labouf

— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This link (we call it a diff listing) proves that I have edited the school shooting article. Now, in similar style, prove to me that you have edited the six bios listed above. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 02:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: here
⊥m93 ^talk. 03:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I was looking through your stuff on your page. I just don't know where to begin. I guess we'll start here and here. You say that

"I haved learned by better users that I shouldn't copyright others userpages."

But I look through your userpage and there are just several things that don't add up.

1. You have the userbox {{User wikipedia/rollback}} on your page. Well guess what... you haven't been granted roll back rights. If you did (on the list) your name would appear like these people. But instead your name appears like this. Notice a difference? No? Lemme help you out... it doesn't say (rollbacker) next to your name. A rollbacker is a user that has been granted roll back rights. And from the looks of it you haven't been granted roll back status.
2. {{User contrib|7000|T-dot}} Hmm... let's see... I believe it says 184 total. So where are the other 6816 contributions? Hmm... and 75 of those (approx. 41%) are "contributions" to your OWN userpage (excluding the 5 that are still in your namespace). But quantity doesn't matter. What matters most is that you are falsely advertising your number of edits. The one userbox that says +131 (think that's what it says) is correct because obviously 184 is more than 131, but 184 ≠ 7000+. Sorry, but if you think 184 = 7000+ then you need to go back to kindergarten math.

Those are only two. Look. If you're going to say that you aren't copyrighting material on your userpage, then I would hope you THOROUGHLY check your page BEFORE you say that kind of stuff. I'm not getting "on your case"; just trying to help you out. ⊥m93 ^talk. 02:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, you will be blocked from editing. The article cites a source for Transformers being a trilogy, so unless you have a source that says otherwise, the third movie is the final one in the trilogy.

"Do you know how to leave your signature.If not you are not a proper wikipedian.I suggest you should refer to more wikipedia pages other than Transformers revenge of the fallen."

As you can see from tons of other messages from UKER, he/she in fact does know how to sign messages. But I mean come on!!! You're wasting good edits. No need to be nagging on UKER because her didn't sign a message... BIG WHOOP! There is something that looks exactly like this:

_{—Preceding unsigned comment added by Anesleyp (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)} [reply]

You can see this here as by one of your edits. OH and look!!!! You didn't sign here either! You're no better.

---

"P.S. are you a administrator if not you will not be able to block me from editing."

I believe you are referring to this? Ok. It is true that HE/SHE cannot block you, but he/she sure as heck can bring you to an admin's attention... oh and an admin CAN block you.

---

"P.S. are you a administrator"

From now on you need to check this list. It is a list of EVERY admin.

---

Seriously man. From now on, quit nagging UKER. It seems that no matter what you're always in a dispute with them. If you have another issue about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen don't be clouding up their talk page with junk that needs to be put on the talk page instead. You really need to be focused on expanding WP rather than keeping other users in-line.

And just to make you happy... I'm going to sign my message. Are you ready? Here it goes.

⊥m93 ^talk. 05:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Nobody cares HOW many edits you have. Quantity doesn't matter, it's quality. And I'm not nagging you per se. I'm trying to help you out. That is anther wiki thing we do here; we help each other out. Whether informally or formally, we do. And it doesn't matter how much space I take up. It's a talk page. What does that mean...? Hmm let's think.... TO TALK! And just because I provide a useful link to help you check to see if they are an admin doesn't mean I'm calling you stupid. And in the future please refrain from using such language in your messages. We're trying to be polite not rude here on WP. ⊥m93 ^talk. 00:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please immediately cease reverting the article at Chelsea Lately. Please engage the other editor on the article's talk page and work out your differences. I have temporarily protected the page until you two can establish a consensus version. Let me know when you've concluded your discussion and I will re-open the article. Thanks. Kuru ^talk 23:05, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Anesley (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ke$ha TiK ToK.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! :) Chase wc⁹¹ 23:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i went on wikipedia to do some research and i received a message stating that the posts i posted were false claims .. althougn they are not. although i may not be the actual person who i wrote about or added information upon (which are the rules i followed) i do work in the company. theres also proof on the sites. so please let me know on how i can send that proof to you because i dont want to be considered as a false claimer. that message scared me in a way i didnt know what to do as a matter of fact im confused on why wikipedia believes the claims are false. like i stated previously i have no problem showing more proof. thank you for your time. -byron mcneish (akon's sound engineer) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.121.201.58 (talk) 06:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because Chelsea Lately is a talk show and not a show with a story and plot like Glee or The Office, a list of episodes is not needed and unpractical. Plus, even if you only list the guest for each episode, older episodes didn't always have guests and the information would be borderline impossible to find. Sorry for my lack of support, but the page probably would be deleted anyway making all the work put into it all for naught. -Skyler 03:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do canvassing and since it's a daily talk show, we don't need an article listing every episode of the series, so I would not support it (and have asked for deletion on "List of talk show episodes" articles in the past). Sorry. Nate • (chatter) 03:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, List of Chelsea Lately episodes, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tv.com/chelsea-lately/show/74584/episode.html?printable=1. As a copyright violation, List of Chelsea Lately episodes appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. List of Chelsea Lately episodes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:List of Chelsea Lately episodes and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:List of Chelsea Lately episodes with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:List of Chelsea Lately episodes.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sarilox (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anesleyp! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 140 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Chaz Lamar Shepherd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ChelseaLatelyJaniseDickison.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:56, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chelsea lately australia1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 20:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Comedians of Chelsea Lately.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rsz 2chelsealatelyroundtable.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a particular reason you are mass reverting the changes I made to this article? I explained my changes on the talk page and even provided details as to what I removed and why. You are adding back poorly written, repeated and misspelled content (not to mention a number a dead links) for absolutely no reason. If you and that IP user don't start explaining your edits, I will request that the page be locked. A cursory glance at the history of the article shows that you both revert whomever edits the article for no reason no matter what kind of changes are made. That is unacceptable behavior. If you have an issue, take it to the talk page as I suggested in my last edit summary. Pinkadelica^♣ 06:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically asked you to take your concerns to the talk page instead of edit warring and instead, you blindly revert. There were other constructive changes made to the article that you did not have to revert. Is there a reason you felt that all the changes I made don't belong? Additionally, you did not remove any of the dead links and you added back loads of content that does not need to be there. The article does not need two different sections about the co-host Chuy Bravo. The article also does not need a detailed account of what the official website has to offer. Not that it matters but I watch the show regularly which means I know original research when I see it. As I stated previously, I've looked at the history of the article and it's apparent that any time anyone makes any changes, you or the IP revert. Whether you like it or not, other people are allowed to edit and change this article. If you don't like it, I suggest you don't edit Wikipedia. Pinkadelica^♣ 01:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any further communication about the article should be made via the article's talk page. I'm opening an RfC because I'm not going to edit war with you over this nonsense. Pinkadelica^♣ 01:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea what your problem is but edits like this are disruptive. Removing the tag is not going to stop the RfC. Pinkadelica^♣ 23:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I do have a problem. Thank you for making me aware of it. Pinkadelica^♣ 04:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anesley, could I trouble you to join the discussion on the article's talk page before making any other reversions? As much as I appreciate your enthusiasm about filling out the article, valid concerns about the sourcing of the material have been raised. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anesleyp for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Pinkadelica^♣ 06:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Chelsea-Lately.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ChelseaLatelyJaniseDickison.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:06, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright mate. Fixer23 (talk) 22:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kesha. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. It is also inappropriate to reinstate a mix of sourced and unsourced claims to a BLP with an edit summary falsely asserting that all claims are sourced. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anesleyp reported by User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior on the Kesha article is very close to earning you a block. It would be good if you answer the 3RR complaint (at the above link) and promise to stop warring on this article. If you will agree to abide by consensus, the complaint might be closed without further action. If a block is issued, it might be for two weeks, since you were blocked for one week in January. EdJohnston (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the 3RR complaint is here. The Kesha article has been protected from editing for one week due to the edit war. Please use the talk page to persuade other editors to support your changes, instead of taking action unilaterally. If you do not abide by consensus, you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:De34a81b0c7bc8eb_Kesha.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Melesse (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kesha @13.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted to Template talk:Chelsea Handler explaining my removal of certain material. Please discuss on that page before re-inserting. The Hero of This Nation (talk) 22:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i noticed you uploaded a new image to Kesha. Just to let you know i have reverted your edit. I did this because the image you changed it to is an image i uploaded, im waiting for wiki to confirm my licensing on the the image, so until its confirmed, its not allowed to be used in an article to comply with copyrighting laws. If you have any questions leave me a message on my Talk Page ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 02:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that the use of non-free content in portals, such as Portal:Kesha and subsidiary pages, is not permitted per terms of WP:NFCC #9. Non-free content may only be used in mainspace articles. I've removed non-free content from a host of pages you created and/or updated, such as Portal:Kesha/Selected song/1 where I removed File:Kesha love is my drug new.jpg. When you look at an image description page, if you see a sign such as this one:

it means it is non-free and can not be used outside of articles. Please do not place such content on portals. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rsz 2chelsealatelyroundtable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Youtube is not a reliable source. Please to not add it to any article again. Thank You - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont add "Boy Like You" to Kesha discography again. Your link is a fansite that does not give writing credit for the song. It only says the song is "Boy Like You". Doesnt mention Kesha - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appoligize because i didn't see the new message so i already had added it back.--☺♪Ane§leyP♫☻ (talk) 05:58, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Cannibal (EP), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Comedians of Chelsea Lately.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:

Kansas City Saturday, June 16, starting at 9 a.m. — National Archives in Kansas City This full-day event will include a tour of the facility; presentations from National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, Dominic McDevitt-Parks, and Exhibit Specialist, Dee Harris; and time in the research room to work on projects. The focus of the projects will be scanning, writing articles, transcribing, or categorizing images on Commons. Wikipedians from St. Louis and elsewhere in the region are encouraged to make a day-trip of it and come to Kansas City for this special opportunity!
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere: Wichita Saturday, June 23, starting at 1 p.m. — Central Riverside Park Join the 1st annual Wichita Wiknic: The Sunflower State blooms Free Knowledge! St. Louis Saturday, June 23, starting at 11 a.m. — Forest Park Visitors' Center Join the 2nd annual St Louis Wiknic: The Gateway to the West is now The Gateway to the Wiki!

Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Formula_One#Test_and_Reserve_Drivers.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barry Floyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Floyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Portal:Kesha, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kesha and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kesha during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]