User talk:Azumi121

Hi Azumi121! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Azumi121! You created a thread called Same Name but Different Person at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Azumi121. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hijacking an article by changing the subject of a biography is highly disruptive. I've moved the article back to it's original state. If you want to create Ryan Avery (speaker) then go ahead but do it in a seperate new article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am answering your query here because the question didn't quite fit into the goal of the noticeboard you posted it to.

When you wish to create an article for someone with the same name as the topic of an existing article, you add a phrase in parentheses after the title to disambiguate it from other people of that name. In this case, the title would be Ryan Avery (speaker) (not "keynote speaker", because we want the simplest information needed to disambiguate from other Ryan Averies; not capitalized "Speaker" because we want a profession, not a title.)

Having seen your prior attempt to create an article for this individual, I will recommend that you use our Articles For Creation process, which will allow someone to check the article and make sure it's appropriate before it goes live. If you have some connection to Mr. Avery, you should review our guidelines on recognizing when you have a conflict of interest and how to contribute to Wikipedia when you do so.

Let me know if you have any further questions. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please revert your move of Ryan Avery as it is disruptive. Do not overwrite any articles with different people. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not hijack articles by changing their subjects. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes you are welcolme to create a draft article on him if you like but the title will need disambiguation meaning putting his profession in brackets after his name such as Ryan Avery (businessman) or what is appropriate, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted on disambiguation. Thank you so much talk.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
8		Baltimore Thunder (talk)	Add sources
36		Lacrosse in the United States (talk)	Add sources
3		Major League Lacrosse All-Star Game (talk)	Add sources
2		National Lacrosse League Weekly Awards (talk)	Add sources
6		Calgary Foothills WFC (talk)	Add sources
3		École secondaire Georges-P.-Vanier (talk)	Add sources
74		Barbara d'Urso (talk)	Cleanup
78		Just society (talk)	Cleanup
6		Sports for Peace (talk)	Cleanup
290		National Lacrosse League (talk)	Expand
117		Mohegan Sun Arena (talk)	Expand
4		NLL Team Capsules (talk)	Expand
3		West Central Lacrosse League (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
12		Goaltender (field lacrosse) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54		Canadian humour (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
192		Dissent (talk)	Merge
115		German Canadians (talk)	Merge
734		Artificial cardiac pacemaker (talk)	Merge
8		Carmen Alcayde (talk)	Wikify
1,415		Matt Edmondson (talk)	Wikify
61		Criminal law of Canada (talk)	Wikify
4		Asia Island (Peru) (talk)	Orphan
2		Apoyaco (talk)	Orphan
2		Badakhshan national football team (talk)	Orphan
3		Mike Poulin (talk)	Stub
2		Matt Disher (talk)	Stub
2		Shawn Cable (talk)	Stub
3		Curt Malawsky (talk)	Stub
3		Ryan McNish (talk)	Stub
2		Devan Wray (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Herpetogenesis were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Avery (speaker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ryan Avery (speaker), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 06:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Avery (speaker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ryan Avery (speaker), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 10:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Avery (speaker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Avery (speaker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bonadea contributions talk 10:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]