User talk:Avd3939

Hello, I know that we all have novels and tv shows we like, but please do not add fictional people to lists of notable people as you have done at List of people from Albuquerque, New Mexico. Please use Fandom or another fan-site or social media for that. We are an encyclopedia. Thank you, Netherzone (talk) 13:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm sorry for that mistake AravindEditor (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I did notice that he is listed in this article: List of fictional scientists and engineers, and of course on the Breaking Bad article. If you are not familiar with editing wikipedia, l suggest taking this tutorial: The Wikipedia Adventure. Happy editing! Netherzone (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oppenheimer (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! AdmiralAckbar1977 ^{talk contribs} 23:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your edit on the Box Office figures using HT has been reverted. Kindly see this for a better understanding on reliable sources: WP:FRUIT Audit Guy (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Franz Beckenbauer, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-adding the tag poster. The license on it is not correct and, if you click on it, you'll see it's a candidate for speedy deletion. Please discuss the issue further on the talk page, as you seem to want to add it for WP:POV reasons. — Czello ^(music) 11:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Indian general election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ok123l (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing of vandalism just i changed the fonts and also brought the Issue side to the campaign section? AravindEditor (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you call your wholesale removal of references from a whole section not vandalism? One more edit like that and I would have no choice but to file an ANI on you. And don't think a WP:FORUM argument would take you off the hook. Borgenland (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My warning was in response to this edit, not the font or issues moved to campaign section stuff. Ok123l (talk) 18:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay im sorry for that, wont repeat such things again.

Thank you. AravindEditor (talk) 18:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2024 Indian general election, you may be blocked from editing. . Borgenland (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sir! Sorry! I understand my mistake. AravindEditor (talk) 16:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to here anyway I don't about this but if I have done mistake then I'm sorry AravindEditor (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being sorry is insufficient, and I'm not sure you actually understand the mistakes you're making. It's important that you become competent if you wish to be an editor, as currently you are causing others to have to clean up and repair the damage you've been inflicting, whether that's image licensing issues, blankings, or manual of style errors. There is no requirement that you rush into editing -- I strongly recommend that you should take the time to become deeply familiar with the policies, best practices, guidelines, and standards here on Wikipedia before continuing further. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 18:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure i will try to understand each and every policy properly before making an edit anymore, im really sorry for the action, other than sorry all i can do is to promise that i would be a better editor from now own only after learning its ways

thank you AravindEditor (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rejoy2003. I noticed that you recently removed content from Toni Kroos without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 18:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to clear a vandalism that had been done to the page but accidentally deleted the major potion of the page, sorry for the mistake, the issue has been solved Avd3939 (talk) 18:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Toni Kroos. Thank you. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 18:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Toni Kroos. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 18:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Devara: Part 1, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Also Sacnilk.com is not a reliable source. Charliehdb (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]