User talk:Neohzq98

Hello, Neohzq98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Jaime (album). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey talk:Neohzq98, thanks for all your recent updates in Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors article! You've done a tremendeous job of fixing a ton of grammar/syntax/etc mistakes - HUGE kudos for that! Also, apologies if I came across strong in my recent updates (when I returned some of the things you previously deleted) - its just that I spent literally close to 20+ hrs going through sources that could be used to update the article, so obviously my selfish "ego" is hurt when say a bunch of reviews are just flat out deleted (but I am not an idiot, I mean I realize that the current 'Review' seciton is probably still bloated - I just don't think that we should just flat-out remove URL links to reviews, we should probably keep the URLs, and just group the reviews thematically (i.e., those who praised the use of 'vibrant colours' in the film could be grouped into one sentence etc.).

Btw, I actually recently asked one of the old article contributors - Arjayay -to do some badly-needed copy-editing on the article [1], but he just flat out ignored me. Had I known that you are interested in the topic and don't mind helping improve the article, I would've reached out to you instead.

Anyhow, thank you kind Brit (I'am assuming that you're a Brit, since you corrected theater to theatre :D).--73.8.106.93 (talk) 21:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@73.8.106.93: Hey, thanks for sending me this message. I apologize if I sounded rude in my comments, and also for initially deleting a whole chunk of some of the sections without any warning. I am not a frequent editor but I do read a lot of film pages, so this article took me by surprise since some of the sections are unusually long in comparison. I looked through the version history before I started editing and yes I've seen that you've put in a lot of hard work into it (huge thanks for that!), but part of me felt that maybe you were overenthusiastic and had gone overboard so I felt the need to trim the article down. But then again I don't have much experience in editing so maybe I've taken a few things too far without considering the effort that you've already put in, and I'm sorry for that.

As for your suggestion for grouping some of the reviews thematically, yeah I think we can look into that and I'll be willing to help out if there is a suitable way to do it.

And yeah thanks again for reaching out to me. I was afraid that I was at the brink of an edit war but hey, you're actually a nice person haha. Cheers. Neohzq98 (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Neohzq98, thanks for the kind words - and would love if you could help iprove 'Reviews' section by further bucketing reviews thematically etc. As I told Arjayay a week ago [2], I feel I've stared at this article for so long that I no longer see various issues with the article (it's like when one writes an essay for Freshman Writing class and keeps re-writing it to a point where it seems 'perfect' to them, bu in fact there are plenty of issues with the essay, it's just that one stops seeing them after staring at words for tood long!).--73.8.106.93 (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]