User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Neelix. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mulembwè. Since you had some involvement with the Mulembwè redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joaquim Mulémbwe. Since you had some involvement with the Joaquim Mulémbwe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fools fire. Since you had some involvement with the Fools fire redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fools fires. Since you had some involvement with the Fools fires redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fool's fires. Since you had some involvement with the Fool's fires redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect River of hate. Since you had some involvement with the River of hate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Welbore Agar-Ellis. Since you had some involvement with the Welbore Agar-Ellis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George Welbore Agar-Ellis. Since you had some involvement with the George Welbore Agar-Ellis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George James Agar-Ellis. Since you had some involvement with the George James Agar-Ellis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George James Welbore. Since you had some involvement with the George James Welbore redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George Welbore. Since you had some involvement with the George Welbore redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James Welbore. Since you had some involvement with the James Welbore redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Putting on. Since you had some involvement with the Putting on redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dear Lake. Since you had some involvement with the Dear Lake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dear Harbor. Since you had some involvement with the Dear Harbor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sunshades. Since you had some involvement with the Sunshades redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Abbreviationality. Since you had some involvement with the Abbreviationality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Abbreviatory. Since you had some involvement with the Abbreviatory redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Breviators. Since you had some involvement with the Breviators redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Abbreviaters. Since you had some involvement with the Abbreviaters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Abbreviational. Since you had some involvement with the Abbreviational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Perfumingly. Since you had some involvement with the Perfumingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fumed. Since you had some involvement with the Fumed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Partyingly. Since you had some involvement with the Partyingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Partyistic. Since you had some involvement with the Partyistic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Party systemic. Since you had some involvement with the Party systemic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Support for the Axis Powers. Since you had some involvement with the Support for the Axis Powers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Axis supporter. Since you had some involvement with the Axis supporter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Axis supporter during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Axis supporter during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Axis supporters. Since you had some involvement with the Axis supporters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Axis supporters during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Axis supporters during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Support for Nazi Germany. Since you had some involvement with the Support for Nazi Germany redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Support for Nazi Germany during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Support for Nazi Germany during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Support for Nazis during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Support for Nazis during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Support for Nazism during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Support for Nazism during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporter of Nazi Germany. Since you had some involvement with the Supporter of Nazi Germany redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporter of Nazi Germany during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporter of Nazi Germany during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporter of Nazis. Since you had some involvement with the Supporter of Nazis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporter of Nazis during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporter of Nazis during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporter of Nazism during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporter of Nazism during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporters of Nazi Germany. Since you had some involvement with the Supporters of Nazi Germany redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporters of Nazi Germany during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporters of Nazi Germany during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporters of Nazis. Since you had some involvement with the Supporters of Nazis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporters of Nazis during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporters of Nazis during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supporters of Nazism during World War II. Since you had some involvement with the Supporters of Nazism during World War II redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro Axis. Since you had some involvement with the Pro Axis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro-Axis. Since you had some involvement with the Pro-Axis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shaggingness. Since you had some involvement with the Shaggingness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reddiaper baby. Since you had some involvement with the Reddiaper baby redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redletters. Since you had some involvement with the Redletters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red-letter editions. Since you had some involvement with the Red-letter editions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Red-letter edition. Since you had some involvement with the Red-letter edition redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redorange. Since you had some involvement with the Redorange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redstripe. Since you had some involvement with the Redstripe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bluebabies. Since you had some involvement with the Bluebabies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shaggingly. Since you had some involvement with the Shaggingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BDBC. Since you had some involvement with the BDBC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:27, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Compassion of God. Since you had some involvement with the Compassion of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quadruple glazer. Since you had some involvement with the Quadruple glazer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 07:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect קישקעריש. Since you had some involvement with the קישקעריש redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nona hora. Since you had some involvement with the Nona hora redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ἅλως. Since you had some involvement with the Ἅλως redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect King of fragrance. Since you had some involvement with the King of fragrance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The king of smell. Since you had some involvement with the The king of smell redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect King of smell. Since you had some involvement with the King of smell redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That on which the moth rests. Since you had some involvement with the That on which the moth rests redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sugandaraja. Since you had some involvement with the Sugandaraja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The king of fragrance. Since you had some involvement with the The king of fragrance redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xinxiao. Since you had some involvement with the Xinxiao redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bunga sedap malam. Since you had some involvement with the Bunga sedap malam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:16, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragrant night flower. Since you had some involvement with the Fragrant night flower redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragrant night flowers. Since you had some involvement with the Fragrant night flowers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sambangi. Since you had some involvement with the Sambangi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nose worthy. Since you had some involvement with the Nose worthy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New hook. Since you had some involvement with the New hook redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Night-fragrant. Since you had some involvement with the Night-fragrant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Night fragrant. Since you had some involvement with the Night fragrant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rojoni-Gondha. Since you had some involvement with the Rojoni-Gondha redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Not wetting. Since you had some involvement with the Not wetting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Undeserving poor. Since you had some involvement with the Undeserving poor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 07:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uncovering. Since you had some involvement with the Uncovering redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:13, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Querulously. Since you had some involvement with the Querulously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Finery, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.drapersonline.com/people/the-drapers-interview/the-drapers-interview-finerys-nickyl-raithatha/7003210.fullarticle. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

  If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect On the circle. Since you had some involvement with the On the circle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:12, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Francoise Sophie Gay. Since you had some involvement with the Francoise Sophie Gay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 01:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Existentialisation. Since you had some involvement with the Existentialisation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Peter of Alcantara Francis Anthony John Charles Xavier of Paula Michael Raphael Joachim Joseph Gonzaga Pascal Cyprian Seraph. Since you had some involvement with the Peter of Alcantara Francis Anthony John Charles Xavier of Paula Michael Raphael Joachim Joseph Gonzaga Pascal Cyprian Seraph redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Existentialisations. Since you had some involvement with the Existentialisations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Just-before-the-battle. Since you had some involvement with the Just-before-the-battle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Novitiations. Since you had some involvement with the Novitiations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sensibilisational. Since you had some involvement with the Sensibilisational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sensibilisations. Since you had some involvement with the Sensibilisations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sensibilizers. Since you had some involvement with the Sensibilizers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sensibilizer. Since you had some involvement with the Sensibilizer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tradeunionisms. Since you had some involvement with the Tradeunionisms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mandragola oder Der Liebhaber als Arzt. Since you had some involvement with the Mandragola oder Der Liebhaber als Arzt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect La mandragore. Since you had some involvement with the La mandragore redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O dromos tis agapis. Since you had some involvement with the O dromos tis agapis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Mandrake (1975 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mandrake (1975 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 08:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect La Mandragola (film). Since you had some involvement with the La Mandragola (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Complot de famille. Since you had some involvement with the Complot de famille redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 09:43, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Faggingly. Since you had some involvement with the Faggingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mushroomingly. Since you had some involvement with the Mushroomingly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 10:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mushroomhunt. Since you had some involvement with the Mushroomhunt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Town of water. Since you had some involvement with the Town of water redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Villes d'eau. Since you had some involvement with the Villes d'eau redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sensibilisations for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Labourunionisms for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tradeunionisms for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Laborunionisms for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tradeunionistic for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mushroomingly for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faggingly for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egalitarianistically. Since you had some involvement with the Egalitarianistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:08, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Egalitarianistically for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beautiful voiced. Since you had some involvement with the Beautiful voiced redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Traditionalistically. Since you had some involvement with the Traditionalistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect So called. Since you had some involvement with the So called redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arsonistically. Since you had some involvement with the Arsonistically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Without obstacles. Since you had some involvement with the Without obstacles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of the breasts. Since you had some involvement with the Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of the breasts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of the breast. Since you had some involvement with the Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of the breast redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Granulomatous inflammatory lesion of the breast. Since you had some involvement with the Granulomatous inflammatory lesion of the breast redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Granulomatous inflammatory lesion of the breasts. Since you had some involvement with the Granulomatous inflammatory lesion of the breasts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of breasts. Since you had some involvement with the Granulomatous inflammatory lesions of breasts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mathyu. Since you had some involvement with the Mathyu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect When the bough breaks the cradle will fall. Since you had some involvement with the When the bough breaks the cradle will fall redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Butter worth. Since you had some involvement with the Butter worth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lisabeth. Since you had some involvement with the Lisabeth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Declinedly. Since you had some involvement with the Declinedly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chief Sepass. Since you had some involvement with the Chief Sepass redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American Federation of Reformed Young Mens Societies. Since you had some involvement with the American Federation of Reformed Young Mens Societies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Subatoi. Since you had some involvement with the Subatoi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 04:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SCTN. Since you had some involvement with the SCTN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lieutenant Palmer. Since you had some involvement with the Lieutenant Palmer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Game industries. Since you had some involvement with the Game industries redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cossets. Since you had some involvement with the Cossets redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Springers (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Springers (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Occasional. Since you had some involvement with the Occasional redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Speaker-man. Since you had some involvement with the Speaker-man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-mouth. Since you had some involvement with the White-mouth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:23, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect White-water. Since you had some involvement with the White-water redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Browngrey. Since you had some involvement with the Browngrey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ronnie Drake. Since you had some involvement with the Ronnie Drake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ronnie Drake. Since you had some involvement with the Ronnie Drake redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Truth: Red, White, & Black. Since you had some involvement with the Truth: Red, White, & Black redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant Film. Since you had some involvement with the Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant Film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Janee Tucker. Since you had some involvement with the Janee Tucker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lord, Protect My Child. Since you had some involvement with the Lord, Protect My Child redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Video games industries. Since you had some involvement with the Video games industries redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect St Lukes Church. Since you had some involvement with the St Lukes Church redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:26, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foamnest. Since you had some involvement with the Foamnest redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roughskinned. Since you had some involvement with the Roughskinned redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roughskinned is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roughskinned until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roughskinned. Since you had some involvement with the Roughskinned redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socio-technologies. Since you had some involvement with the Socio-technologies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sociotechnically. Since you had some involvement with the Sociotechnically redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Schoen/The world, the flesh, and the devil, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Schoen/The world, the flesh, and the devil and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Schoen/The world, the flesh, and the devil during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 04:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Robert H. Tucker, Jr. Since you had some involvement with the Robert H. Tucker, Jr redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Welltodo. Since you had some involvement with the Welltodo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Non-male. Since you had some involvement with the Non-male redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sociotechnics. Since you had some involvement with the Sociotechnics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socio-technics. Since you had some involvement with the Socio-technics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Socio-technic. Since you had some involvement with the Socio-technic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sociotechnic. Since you had some involvement with the Sociotechnic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 12:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Establishedness. Since you had some involvement with the Establishedness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xerodermic. Since you had some involvement with the Xerodermic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dryskin. Since you had some involvement with the Dryskin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:50, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Romani people in Portugal and Brazil. Since you had some involvement with the Romani people in Portugal and Brazil redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christmas shop. Since you had some involvement with the Christmas shop redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stop Child Trafficking. Since you had some involvement with the Stop Child Trafficking redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Oriental garden. Since you had some involvement with the Oriental garden redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Let Me Be a Woman: Notes to my Daughter on the Meaning of Womanhood. Since you had some involvement with the Let Me Be a Woman: Notes to my Daughter on the Meaning of Womanhood redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NAPCHT. Since you had some involvement with the NAPCHT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Young Women's Christian Association Women of Distinction. Since you had some involvement with the Young Women's Christian Association Women of Distinction redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Hubert Humphrey School of Public Affairs. Since you had some involvement with the The Hubert Humphrey School of Public Affairs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Possession of arms. Since you had some involvement with the Possession of arms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Homeless rabbi. Since you had some involvement with the Homeless rabbi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fragmental. Since you had some involvement with the Fragmental redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

The article Mountain people has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

after I remove three inappropriate contrive entries built through Neelix redirects, and one link to a page that does not exist, there is no real reason for this DAB page,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mountain people (Vietnam). Since you had some involvement with the Mountain people (Vietnam) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Second kind of woman. Since you had some involvement with the Second kind of woman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sao praphet song. Since you had some involvement with the Sao praphet song redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:56, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kathoei. Since you had some involvement with the Kathoei redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National action plan. Since you had some involvement with the National action plan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 07:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brave man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brave man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 10:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Figurational. Since you had some involvement with the Figurational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 13:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Possession of weapons. Since you had some involvement with the Possession of weapons redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GPACTP. Since you had some involvement with the GPACTP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 20:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Goldspotted pond frogs. Since you had some involvement with the Goldspotted pond frogs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Everymans. Since you had some involvement with the Everymans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Possession of firearms. Since you had some involvement with the Possession of firearms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kolompar family organization. Since you had some involvement with the Kolompar family organization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Domotor family organisation. Since you had some involvement with the Domotor family organisation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Domotor family crime organization. Since you had some involvement with the Domotor family crime organization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Illegal possession of ammunitions. Since you had some involvement with the Illegal possession of ammunitions redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Domotor Kolompar family organisation. Since you had some involvement with the Domotor Kolompar family organisation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:57, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antivoting. Since you had some involvement with the Antivoting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

The article 25 Transformational Canadians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

none of the references are actually about the award

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chagrins. Since you had some involvement with the Chagrins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jiggle. Since you had some involvement with the Jiggle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect East person. Since you had some involvement with the East person redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 06:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dance company of Canada. Since you had some involvement with the Dance company of Canada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 09:51, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Force of Japan. Since you had some involvement with the Force of Japan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 12:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Caro, mundus, et diabolus. Since you had some involvement with the Caro, mundus, et diabolus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect T and A Television. Since you had some involvement with the T and A Television redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Popular government. Since you had some involvement with the Popular government redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Professionalizational. Since you had some involvement with the Professionalizational redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wo'rlv. Since you had some involvement with the Wo'rlv redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United Federation. Since you had some involvement with the United Federation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 23:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reaches. Since you had some involvement with the Reaches redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marcs. Since you had some involvement with the Marcs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 00:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Connubial. Since you had some involvement with the Connubial redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Friedrich Credner. Since you had some involvement with the Friedrich Credner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nourisher. Since you had some involvement with the Nourisher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dagnu. Since you had some involvement with the Dagnu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frederick Tandberg. Since you had some involvement with the Frederick Tandberg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glassish. Since you had some involvement with the Glassish redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect All woes. Since you had some involvement with the All woes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rapere. Since you had some involvement with the Rapere redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 03:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Multi-Coloured. Since you had some involvement with the Multi-Coloured redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big-Hearted. Since you had some involvement with the Big-Hearted redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Franz-Joseph von Reichenstein. Since you had some involvement with the Franz-Joseph von Reichenstein redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamie Samson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Samson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jamie Samson. Since you had some involvement with the Jamie Samson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Disheartener. Since you had some involvement with the Disheartener redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reductiveness. Since you had some involvement with the Reductiveness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adult Association. Since you had some involvement with the Adult Association redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Angled. Since you had some involvement with the Angled redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 16:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert H. Tucker, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Tucker, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cucumber salad. Since you had some involvement with the Cucumber salad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 19:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dishearten. Since you had some involvement with the Dishearten redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deject. Since you had some involvement with the Deject redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 02:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glass like. Since you had some involvement with the Glass like redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glass-like. Since you had some involvement with the Glass-like redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Plaintively. Since you had some involvement with the Plaintively redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 06:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)