User talk:Mobius Clock

Welcome!

Hello, Mobius Clock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Leave Message, Yellow Evan home 14:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coding... a general XfD tag-on-demand bot for just this sort of thing, will file a general BRFA with reference to this run later. - Mobius Clock 15:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Let me know if a I can help with a bot readable list of pages to tag, or the like. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 19:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-readable list of pages would help greatly, if you don't mind. Thanks. - Mobius Clock 19:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. Do you want it with "[[ ]]" or without? ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 19:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With the brackets, one per line, kthx. - Mobius Clock 19:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See User:Carlaude/Rulers

Many thanks and let me know if you proposed name list is unneed or you prefer it differently, e.g. {{subst:cfr|Populated places in Foo|More settlements}}

I also could come up with about a thousand more catagoies that need moving like these, if you have the time. They don't need doing all today. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 19:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks for the list. I'll finish and clean up the code tonight with a view to filing a BRFA and (hopefully) getting started tomorrow. - Mobius Clock 19:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. This gets more complicated if you start tommorow because the "{{subst:cfr" subst text based on the then current date which would then link the tommorow's CFD page, and the discussion is currently on today's page.

The simplest fix is that if you cannot do it today I will just remove the un-tagged ones in the morning from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 May 5#More settlements. Tomorrow or when ever they are all tagged I will just recreate another CDF on that date. Just let me know if you change what you can do, and when they are ready.

We just have to try and create all tags on the same day (in Wikipedia time) that ought to be discussed togther. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 20:09, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, didn't know about that. The chances are that even if I filed a BRFA now, it wouldn't get approved until at least tomorrow anyway, so I think your plan is best. When the tagging run is complete you can relist the other categories. I'll do each subsection as a bulk lot to make organising the CfDs easier. - Mobius Clock 20:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let anyone know who's watching this, that I've filed a BRFA for this task (coding didn't take as long as I thought), feel free to comment here. - Mobius Clock 20:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any news on whether a CfD for some of the other cats is in the works? - Mobius Clock 08:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is this one, but I have been waiting on approval for this bot. Why is it taking so long? ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 22:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the BAG were waiting for an appropriate CfD to be posted here so that a trial can be authorized. I can't run a trial without categories to tag ^_^. Now that we have one it shouldn't take too long. - Mobius Clock 09:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. Lots of CfDs have started and finished on this topic. I am waiting on the approval to start more. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 16:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I meant that the BAG can't monitor CfD 24/7 waiting for one to pop up. Now that one's been brought to their attention, approval shouldn't take too long. - Mobius Clock 17:16, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do they need one? And if they need one, why don't we just point them to a better one. What would they be looking for? Approval? Existence? Format? ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 17:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They need to know that one is ready, so that they know the trial will be completed soon after approval. All bots need to perform some (~20) 'trial run' edits which can be examined for problems before a bot receives final approval. They're not really interested in the exact CfD, just that one's ready. - Mobius Clock 22:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I hope this one will work then. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 07:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I have placed all remaining nominations from the lists from User:Carlaude/Rulers, User:Carlaude/Rulers2, and User:Carlaude/Rulers3 at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 May 17#Many more settlements — except for the "port settlements" at the very end. Feel free to delete from the lists at User:Carlaude/Rulers, User:Carlaude/Rulers2, and User:Carlaude/Rulers3 as you use them. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 05:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see or begin work on this-- if you cannot let me know what Wikipedia calander day you can? Thanks. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 22:08, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw it, but I can't do any more tagging until the BRFA gets final approval. - Mobius Clock 22:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh-- I misread that. Let me know what you wan to do when it does come. ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 23:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see or begin work on this--!? ^{şṗøʀĸɕäɾłäů∂ɛ:τᴀʟĸ} 19:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• When will the tagging start? The nomination is already past its close date, and I think we're going to have to start it over unless it happens right away.--Mike Selinker (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 36#Renaming Primera Division Uruguaya season articles. –xeno^talk 18:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was creating a BRFA for the same exact task that you just created, and I saw it appear on IRC >.< haha :P CrimsonBlue (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mobius Bot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 11:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mobius Bot 3 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 05:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.[reply]

Hi Mobius. I had to block Mobius Bot (talk · contribs) for reasons that should be obvious from its recent edit history. Could you please explain what happened? Favonian (talk) 13:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also curious as to why the bot started randomly replacing page content with "ALL YOUR PAGE ARE BELONG TO US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE" and an edit summary of "ALL YOUR PAGE ARE BELONG TO US". The only thing I can think of is an attack by the computer hacking group Anonymous and some confirmation that this is or is not the case will put my mind at ease (Unless it turns out that is the case...) Barts1a (talk) 08:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mobius hasn't edited since May and may not be aware that anything's happened. I've sent him an email, and will leave a message with BAG or something if I don't get a response. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 15:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• In order to remove the bot from a database report, its bot flag has been removed. Please contact us if/when you wish to return to operations. –xeno^talk 01:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mobius Clock/test2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mobius Clock/test2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mobius Clock/test2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. j⚛e decker^talk 21:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]