User talk:MightyMaven

The deletion of an article you created, Globalscape Mail Express, has been proposed for the following reason:

New software product, no assertion of notability.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Globalscape Mail Express, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. srushe (talk) 16:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote, It's a great product that needs a page just like Adobe products, in order to justify keeping an article. The problem is that you cannot use Wikipedia as a vehicle to get people to know about this software product. You have to get them to know it, and once you have succeeded you can initiate a Wikipedia article on it. See Wikipedia's policy on notability. Has there been a review of this software from a reliable source unrelated to its developpers? If not, Wikipedia just cannot have an article on it, regardless of how great this product is.

I hope I have shed some light on this matter. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did not realize I removed such a tag. If the record shows it was my login that did it, then prob it was me. But it's not my style to argue my points by removing an editor's tag, for sure, so if me, it was certainly unintentional, and thanks for not jumping on me about it. I appreciate that. I will continue to review the Help for what is appropriate content, citations and so forth, and am doing so today making copious notes and bookmarks even though I really want to get the page going. The page I am preparing now, five years later. Thank you.

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TappIn.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ///EuroCarGT 02:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TappIn, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MightyMaven. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "TappIn".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TappIn}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Are you in any way affiliated with Globalscape? -- intgr [talk] 15:11, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No. I use CuteFTP and Tappin, two of their products. I never worked for them and don't plan on it. Far as I recall, nobody who works for a company is able to do that company's wiki, correct? I'm learning good editing skills and think Wikipedia does a lot for people, knowing how it works out for me, so I'm contributing somewhere I know about. Now my dad, Jack Newman, was a country music writer, singer-songwriter as they call them these days, and I'd like to write a wiki on him here some day, so this helps me with that. He toured with Elvis, wrote for the big name country singers Hank Snow and Jim Reeves. I get concerned at times I won't be permitted to write about him because I'm family and not objective in some peoples' minds, but in most people's minds, I'm THE expert on Jack Newman, so it's a bit of a conundrum for me. If it's true I can't write about him, and I'm THE expert, something would seem wrong with that. Tell me I'm wrong, please. Thanks!

And yes, I also know Wikipedia is a stickler for following its rules, so if I missed a citation, it's coming. If I wrote too close to a rule, I reread those regularly now, and anything like that would be edited away from gray areas. I'm really conscientious and trying to be a good Wikipedian editor. Thanks for all your help.

PS: Why do you ask? Did I do something wrong that made you think to ask? Thanks. I mean, there had to be a reason you asked, and I'd like to know so I don't raise a bunch of red flags every time I get to posting to the page. I don't take to wasting my time or anybody else's, so if you need to advise me, please do so. Again, thanks for your help.

I once tried to create a Tappin page because it is such a cool software, but the monitor didn't feel it was such a big deal or something. I forget right now. I figure, just do the Globalscape page, fix that up, make it knowledgeable and more complete, check for old or outdated citations, update and upgrade it, make it relevant to the present. I mean, some things you can't go wrong, like I did the key people page because hey, you put their names and positions, and nobody can yell at you. Lol. Hey stop that. I think it's important to know who their partners are and am going to look into that, listing all of them, because they are a small company by most measures, and considered a tiny company, a "microcap" company, and so are pretty much unknown, therefore, when I look to learn about a company like that, it helps me tremendously to find that they have real partners who themselves are very credible, so I can contact those ones, or visit their websites, and then with good companies I'm able to not waste time wondering. I use Wikipedia for learning about companies more than the Better Business Bureau. For sure. So I'm trying to make this very informative for others who are like-minded and looking to check out a company, in this case, Globalscape. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MightyMaven (talk • contribs)

I ask mainly because almost all your edits are related to one single company and your they look like something coming from a marketing department, with overuse of adjectives, buzzwords, trademark symbols and other fancy language. [Hmm. Now maybe you didn't realize that Globalscape supports the US Army which uses their secure file transfer software for logistics support? So I'm going to say it's absolutely imperative that it be secure and reliable. When they say or I say it's mission-critical, that's an ARMY term, not just business term, dealing with keeping the troops safe and secure, to my way of thinking. I'm not a marketer, nor am I paid by a marketing firm or anybody to write this stuff. I'm trying to make a honest assessment of what it is they have, are and do. If I don't have to use trademark and copyright symbols on Wikipedia, I didn't know that and will immediate remove all such identifiers from anywhere I see them, but I understood it wrong that when something is trademarked or copyrighted, that one should conscientiously use the (TM) and (C) to portray those things correctly.] [Now the next thing what you call BullSxxx is what took me a good hour to figure out how to whittle down everything I knew into something narrow but that covered what they do. It definitely has to be reliable and that is a big part of file sharing software, emails, dropbox type services is that mostly they are NOT reliable as far as being secure. Think Snowden and secure FTP. If someone asks me how I would secure their most private information in transfers, I would tell them my own brother-in-law used CuteFTP on the battlefield, and the company that makes that makes a lot more secure softwares than that for enterprises and small to medium sized businesses. SMBs to Enterprises. With the data breaches that occur like Target and Home Depot, both which messed up my bank card accounts, I think I can say that it's important to the max that our sensitive data and IP propertybe secured, and I thought since their software does that no matter the size, I would say it does it in multiple scenarios and across multiple platforms, because it does indeed do that. If you are waiting for my references, okay. But if you are not aware of this being the truth, and able to be confirmed, that's another thing. Like the rules say, everybody learns and makes mistakes and nobody's going to come down on you for trying in good faith. I haven't posted a word of bull in my post. It's frustrating to me to have you use that term with me. BS. If this company's software isn't secure, isn't reliable, isn't able to secure or help secure facets of business it says it can do, they wouldn't be in business. They made $25 million last year, so somebody besides the ARMY buys their software because it works, and to them, a key phrase is "secure information exchange" being what they provide. It sounds like you think they are fly by night. Is that correct?] And that I'm a paid marketer? I'm crippled ex-Marine and live with my 92 year old mom. I'm 60. Neither of us have jobs. We are grateful to Globalscape for helping the Army. My dad is Harvey R. Newman who won 5 silver stars. That's 5. US Army. I guess 5 silver stars hits your BS meter, too, no? I'm gonna do like I did last time and not come back for a year. Every time I try to do something here, I get jumped on, it seems. Now I got you calling my work BS at the emergency level when all I did was honestly describe what the company's software does. Please explain to me what part you think is BS and if it is, I'm sure we can get a file transfer pro from CIO magazine or other rag to agree one way or the other. So please identify the BS. Because none of that which you quote in this following line is a lie at all. but I think we need to get on the same page and there's a lot there you are calling BS, and I can't ask for 3rd party help with you to explain to you that this is really the truth, and verifiable. Who has time for that? All the managed file transfer and enterprise mobility management companies are about trying help individuals and businesses secure their files in transit and at rest, internally and externally to mobile workforces and partners and clients. I'm trying to be thorough. I've got a dozen degrees. I got none of them by BS. Psychology, Spanish, French. Takes hard work. Marines takes hard work. Honest hard work. Please don't belittle me. I may be long-winded, but which facet did I leave in and which did I leave out, was the question. I carefully said yes to each word: reliable, mission-critical, securing not just any data but sensitive data like credit card data for banks or soldier positions and parts needed in Iraq is pretty darn sensitive, not BS, and IP property is so sensitive just ask when they leak the next movie online or somebody's new songs are stolen or there's a breach of all the movie star information, which is what Globalscape and its peers is about stopping. Snowden mentioned the use of secure FTP as being very smart, and Globalscape's CuteFTP and other products use secure FTP for years now and know all about that, and use even stronger than that. Maybe you weren't aware. I thought it important to make sure that any individuals who happened upon the page knew that these products include some things for them, that's it's not just for big enterprises or SMBs or SMEs, and vice versa. Not all companies' products are able to scale up for use at the government level either, so after verifying this was the case for their products, I mentioned that, because as Marine and ARMY related, maybe some other departments of the government ought to be using such software to safeguard their assets. And finally, I thought it would help for those who are viewing Wikipedia like I do, to learn if a company can help them, that if it was a business or government entity person looking for a needed solution, that it would speed things up for them if they actually knew that other people in their industry were using the product(s), and so I said, Well, then, I need to list the companies they and their resellers always seem to target. I've done a lot of reading not just of Globalscape's pages but of their resellers and search engine results and am convinced I haven't included any industries that their products aren't used in. You make me want to quit.

Let me ask you, what do YOU know about MFT or EMM or IAM or the computer file transfer industry or securing computer information from breaches, hackers, insiders, mobile device threats? I don't think a real pro who knows this stuff is going to call that long sentence of mine BS. I think the likelihood is you don't really know the topic. You are prob real good at Wikipedia rules, but not at computer security issues. I tell you what, if it was BS, the Army and my bro-in-law wouldn't use their stuff. for pete sake, this is tiring me out to deal with you. Please be a little more encouraging and even pass me to someone who's a pro in computer security, if you would. I'd prefer a peer review of my statements by someone who's familiar with computer security computer breaches, hackers, intrusion detection, etc. otherwise, how can someone judge what I say as hype or BS or land sake a marketing professional. Now that's a joke. A marketing department. Lol. I wish I knew something about you to try to place your context and view and understand why you see the truth as BS.] My BS meter goes on emergency alert when I read something like "dealing with the reliability of mission-critical operations by securing sensitive data and intellectual property in multiple scenarios and across multiple platforms for individuals, for companies of all sizes from small to medium size businesses to the largest of enterprises, and for governments worldwide in industries such as Healthcare, Entertainment & Media, Financial Services, Energy, Manufacturing, Education, Business Services, Retail, Legal, Government, Travel, and Architecture, Engineering, & Construction".

If you want to write a good Wikipedia article, start by looking for independent reliable sources, like magazine and news articles, and then neutrally describe facts therein, rather than relying on things from the company's website or things that you "know" or reasons why you think the company is awesome. That's how you arrive at a verifiable and neutral article. [I spent an hour trying to respond to you just on this response alone. I don't have an hour. I had hoped to start adding the citations, 3rd party. Tonight. Now mama is calling me to go to bed. It's almost midnight. Now I just posted a lot of this today, and already by midnight I'm under fire and called a BS marketer or that I sound like BS and a marketing department. Merry Christmas. Happy New Year. Is there a forum where I can talk to a real expert in computers that can help me with some of this? Because the BS comments goes to truth, but Wikipedia says more than truth, you want confirmable information that's reliable, not just true, and that sometimes under certain circumstances you can even say what is not necessarily true, but is someone's belief. I hope you were able to see my user page and that I was making notes all day and in there is listed the quotes on making good citations. My citations will have to wait till tomorrow. You come across as a bully, not a friend. Make me feel like a number. A bad number. I don't feel like a war hero when you talk to me, that's for sure. Almost like a criminal. Thanks. I feel like I'm being judged a tad bit harshly. I had seen a lot of the citation material, but didn't copy it down, so have to go back for that. It took me an hour to write that long sentence and I kept the rules in mind. So tell me which thing in them is BS or seems to be BS to you, and I will get an answer or show you where you can find out if it is or not. And then that's beside the bigger point that the Wikipedia Help page says about truth. It says that it's not just writing what's true, but that it needs to come from independent third party sources that are credible, reliable, and I copied that statement on truth and on what sources you should use into my User Page, so that tonight and subsequent visits, I could refer to those notes and ensure I'm only using the best possible sources, and only sources that fit the rules. Furthermore, if I find that any of the statement you said sounded like BS is indeed BS, I will personally be calling the company and demanding they take it off their website, if they say that on their website anywhere, or if one of their resellers or some article in CIO or USA Today stated it, ensure they remove it. I have too much going for me to need to use BS. I have all of Jack Newman's instruments, music, studio perfect records, sheet music, interviews, you name it, phone book, black book, letters, fan letters, check stubs. I don't need to BS to have a life. I brought that to the table. I'm not some punk kid trying to create a fake life or be plastic and cheap for a thrill. I like to write. I thought I could do some good. And if you'd help me instead of call me a BSer, you'd find I'd do just as good a job, A+, as I received in all my work efforts elsewhere, whether in school, universities, music, art, sports until I was crippled, and so on. I believe that you must face a lot of people in your experience who you constantly have to correct, or run off from Wikipedia because they don't read the rulebook and try to fake it and cheat the system. I'm not one of those. Daddy was on the cover of stars & stripes. I learned very young the value of honest work and integrity. Deal with the punks harshly and call them BSers when you have the facts to do so, but with me, you are barking up the wrong tree. ... I see you made some final comments, so I will assure you that I will do my best to adhere to the rules, the big 3, and conform what I said and say with citations from correct sources to the highest Wikipedia standards. I'm not wanting problems but praise, a pat on the back not a slapdown, a smile not a scowl. I began this at Christmas holidays, for pete sake. That ought to be a clue. Do something good for the new year. Random act of kindness. Hey, you, that's BS looks like to me. Nobody gives away $20 bucks to a stranger. if it sounds to good to be true it is. No, stop. I would prefer you said, MightyMaven, if they can do all this sentence says, most novices to the topic would not likely believe it, so you are going to need to back that long statement up, and fast, and with strong, 3rd party citations. If you have any questions about that, ask me. that would have been nice. It comes to me now the statement you opened with "Do you work for the company?" That tells me you were stereotyping me as someone from the company, hyping the software. But I bet you an honest $100 that you can't find one thing I said that is a lie or hype or BS. I will send it to you by Paypal if you can prove any of the BS claim or suspicion, and do so gladly.

Bottom line, I want to write something that people not only believe, but know that they can believe it, with sources that are indeed the highest credibility standing behind my writing. I can see I should not have posted today until I had the proper citations, but honestly, I didn't realize someone was going to target me, today, before the sun set, and challenge me as a BS artist for the company. I mean, that's attacking the company as well, to suggest they would all of a sudden after 18 years in business decide they need to be on Wikipedia and do it in a crooked way. Maybe there ought to be a Wikipedia for businesses and you just have them write about their companies but have people like you trail them around and test them out to verify everything they put there is 3rd party verifiable. I mean, allow them to do their own original write-ups, but only as much as they can back up through independent 3rd party sources. Call it Business Wikipedia or something with nothing on it but what can be verified by credible 3rd parties. This is not though, and I know that. I read and am reading the rulebook over and over to become the best of writers here. As I said I was long-winded, and you can see from this, I was trying to channel this inclination to write into something constructive and useful for others and do so without charge, without remuneration. As a psychologist, I certainly understand the use of credible sources, independent verification of claims. Wikipedia mentions this exact thing in reference to living persons and medical topics, and psychology is as medical as brain surgery. I won't go against my own training to verify. Every study I ever was involved in, double blind placebo studies, having proper controls and getting proper results that can be replicated and verified, that's what it's all about. This is no different. So before I add any more to any of the Globalscape page, I will begin adding citations to today's work I did. That was my plan. Just write it out, use your flow of consciousness like James, that great writer, and then add the citations. And I mean, add the citations, not try to find them, hope to find them. I wrote from my research in a flow. Had I stopped at each phrase to cite it, I would never have gotten so much done. I can see now the hounddogs will chase me if I do that again. So you can be certain and sure that I won't post any more words unless I can post the actual citations with them simultaneously. I will try to remember that not everybody reading or judging my work is an expert as I am in file transfer or the military's use of FIPS and secure FTP systems, and think it sounds fishy. Marketing? No. I write songs, music. But market things? I can write jingles I guess. That's as close as I come to marketing. I cojuld write a jingle to sell something, or some catchphrase. I've been writing songs since I was pre-teen. So I will change my posting method to not post anything I can't cite immediately because the person judging my work on Globalscape doesn't know Globalscape or file transfer or security etc and prob most others won't know it either. I would suggest some system change so that monitors or reviewers are assigned work that fits their qualifications per industry knowledge. But that may not be possible in all cases, but I bet in many it would help someone like me to talk to a peer on Wikipedia who knows what I'm trhing to do, who knows what I'm saying isn't BS, who doesn't need Edward Snowden to tell him about secure FTP to know that CuteFTP is a secure FTP file transfer system, and so forth. That prob sounds like impossible to do, but if eHarmony can do what they do, mathc people up well, why can't Wikipedia do the same with these mini-courts, assessments, reviews or whatever they are called.

Also, maybe someone could suggest where I can enlist the help of others knowledgeable enough to write the Globalscape page here. I read somewhere today I think it said there was a forum to ask for help and mentioned that's a way to bring others into your work, collaborating together I guess it would be, or all doing it separately but together. I'm for that. I'd also like someone to start building a page for my dad, Jack Newman. TNT songwriter, 1950s and 1960s before he left Nashville to quit the music industry after Jim Reeves died. That was a hard day, a hard year. You prob don't know Jim Reeves. O well.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Globalscape, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dir, HR and Pres. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Globalscape, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MightyMaven. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 01:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potent Cannabinoid HU308.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As far as I can tell, every single reference about PPP001 is a primary source.

(Hi, this is MightyMaven. Thanks for your assistance for what is needed. The article has at least one independent reference, which is the Alta Vista scientific analysis of PPP001. Alta Vista is NOT Tetra Bio -Pharma. Their work is independent of them and an independent research facility coming to their own conclusions. I will review the submissions now with comments if necessary and add another half a dozen other independent sources from sources like clinicaltrials.gov.)

The #2 and #3 reference sources are both from the FDA U.S. Food & Drug Administration. You can't get any more 3rd party independent than a governmental agency that has oversight over every pharmaceutical company in the United States. FDA is totally independent from Tetra Bio-Pharma:
"SRO List - Detail". www.accessdata.fda.gov.
"Search Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals". www.accessdata.fda.gov.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PPP001 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PPP001, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MightyMaven! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you were stating "My company..." at Teahouse, as to how your company operates, but there is no connection between you/your company and PPP001 or HU-308, state that clearly and succinctly on your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MightyMaven! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, There is a question about my sources whether they are independent or primary., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MightyMaven. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PPP001, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MightyMaven. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PPP001".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]