Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

User talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk archive/2016

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some reliable music sources

Featured articles

  1. Tell All Your Friends (Taking Back Sunday) – 28 February 2022 (with MFTP Dan)
  2. Bleed American (Jimmy Eat World) – 25 September 2022 (with MFTP Dan)

Good articles

  1. Syd Barrett – 26 July 2012
  2. The Madcap Laughs (Syd Barrett) – 15 August 2012
  3. Atom Heart Mother (Pink Floyd) – 25 September 2012 (with Ritchie333)
  4. A Saucerful of Secrets (Pink Floyd) – 12 December 2012
  5. The Piper at the Gates of Dawn (Pink Floyd) – 27 December 2012
  6. "Jugband Blues" (Pink Floyd) – 1 February 2013
  7. Barrett (Syd Barrett) – 4 February 2013
  8. Rock 'n' Roll (John Lennon) – 4 February 2013
  9. Kisses on the Bottom (Paul McCartney) – 3 March 2013
  10. Mind Games (John Lennon) – 5 May 2013
  11. "Interstellar Overdrive" (Pink Floyd) – 20 June 2013
  12. Flaming Pie (Paul McCartney) – 22 June 2013
  13. Live Peace in Toronto 1969 (John Lennon) – 4 July 2013
  14. Memory Almost Full (Paul McCartney) – 30 July 2013
  15. ‎What Separates Me from You (A Day to Remember) – 29 September 2013
  16. Homesick (A Day to Remember) – 17 October 2013
  17. For Those Who Have Heart (A Day to Remember) – 8 November 2013
  18. And Their Name Was Treason (A Day to Remember) – 9 November 2013
  19. "Instant Karma!" (John Lennon) – 19 January 2014 (with JG66)
  20. A Lesson in Romantics (Mayday Parade) – 20 May 2016 (with MFTP Dan)
  21. Tell All Your Friends (Taking Back Sunday) – 17 August 2016
  22. Further Sky (Basement) – 9 October 2016
  23. Somewhere Somehow (We the Kings) – 25 October 2016
  24. Where You Want to Be (Taking Back Sunday) – 28 December 2016
  25. Louder Now (Taking Back Sunday) – 30 December 2016
  26. The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch (Cute Is What We Aim For) – 8 January 2017
  27. Taking Back Sunday (Taking Back Sunday) – 9 June 2017
  28. New Again (Taking Back Sunday) – 5 July 2017
  29. North (Something Corporate) – 30 September 2017
  30. Nothing Personal (All Time Low) – 12 January 2018
  31. What to Do When You Are Dead (Armor for Sleep) – 21 February 2018
  32. So Wrong, It's Right (All Time Low) – 27 March 2018
  33. Based on a True Story (The Starting Line) – 27 March 2018
  34. Man Overboard (Man Overboard) – 13 May 2018
  35. Sound the Alarm (Saves the Day) – 9 July 2018
  36. War All the Time (Thursday) – 4 July 2019 (with MFTP Dan)
  37. Good Charlotte (Good Charlotte) – 21 November 2019
  38. Leaving Through the Window (Something Corporate) – 5 April 2020
  39. The Chronicles of Life and Death (Good Charlotte) – 13 April 2020
  40. The Young and the Hopeless (Good Charlotte) – 14 April 2020
  41. Page Avenue (Story of the Year) – 15 April 2020
  42. Forget What You Know (Midtown) – 17 April 2020
  43. Mutiny! (Set Your Goals) – 17 April 2020
  44. Everything in Transit (Jack's Mannequin) – 19 April 2020
  45. The Glass Passenger (Jack's Mannequin) – 19 April 2020
  46. Burning at Both Ends (Set Your Goals) – 23 April 2020
  47. This Will Be the Death of Us (Set Your Goals) – 10 May 2020
  48. Direction (The Starting Line) – 15 June 2020
  49. People and Things (Jack's Mannequin) – 12 September 2020
  50. What It Is to Burn (Finch) – 10 October 2020
  51. Straylight Run (Straylight Run) – 13 October 2020
  52. Frame & Canvas (Braid) – 15 October 2020
  53. Your Majesty (The Anniversary) – 18 October 2020
  54. Wood/Water (The Promise Ring) – 22 October 2020
  55. Start the Party (The Blackout) – 3 November 2020
  56. Living in Extraordinary Times (James) – 30 November 2020
  57. Girl at the End of the World (James) – 5 December 2020
  58. Static Prevails (Jimmy Eat World) – 7 February 2021
  59. The Art of Losing (American Hi-Fi) – 8 March 2021
  60. Clarity (Jimmy Eat World) – 15 March 2021
  61. Anthology (Alien Ant Farm) – 22 March 2021
  62. Full Collapse (Thursday) – 31 March 2021
  63. 1977 (Ash) – 15 June 2021
  64. Avalanche United (I Am the Avalanche) – 21 June 2021
  65. Nightfreak and the Sons of Becker (The Coral) – 7 July 2021
  66. Sinners Never Sleep‎ (You Me at Six) – 14 September 2021
  67. Nu-Clear Sounds‎ (Ash) – 26 September 2021
  68. Owls (Owls) – 22 November 2021
  69. Laid (James) – 1 January 2022
  70. Vehicles & Animals (Athlete) – 14 March 2022
  71. The Good Will Out (Embrace) – 14 April 2022
  72. You See Colours (Delays) – 16 June 2022
  73. Faded Seaside Glamour (Delays) – 28 June 2022
  74. People Move On (Bernard Butler) – 22 August 2022
  75. The Artist in the Ambulance (Thrice) – 23 September 2022
  76. Futures (Jimmy Eat World) – 7 October 2022
  77. They're Only Chasing Safety (Underoath) – 16 January 2023
  78. Handcream for a Generation (Cornershop) – 29 January 2023
  79. 30 Goes Around the Sun (The Wonder Stuff) – 28 February 2023
  80. Star Wars and Other Galactic Funk (Meco) – 12 February 2024
  81. Common Courtesy (A Day to Remember) – 29 March 2024 (with MFTP Dan)

Did you know

  1. Turnover discography – 24 April 2021 (with Guerillero)
  2. Futures – 5 November 2022 (nominated by Onegreatjoke)

Happy New Year, Yeepsi!

[edit]
(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

OKAY hi please leave the genres alone

[edit]

OKAY hi please leave the genres alone — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.121.51 (talkcontribs) 09:22, 6 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Neither of the genres are in the source you're adding. Yeepsi (talk) 09:24, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I find that interesting even though i only added the cite to electropop, due to the author including subgenre talk like "synth" pop and "electronic". Anyways The 1975 is an idie pop, indie rock, eletropop band...it was stated on their last album too. Maybe try listening to them? IS there a reason for all the pickiness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.121.51 (talkcontribs) 09:27, 6 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

The "synth" talk is referring to just "Love Me". You need to find a RS that calls the whole album, not just one song, genres X, Y and Z. Re:"Maybe try listening to them?" - see WP:OR. Yeepsi (talk) 09:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further Sky

[edit]

Hello Yeepsi: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors for the article Further Sky has been completed. You will notice that I have archived one of your citations (#1) and I would strongly suggest that you archive the rest as time allows. This ensures that your article's references are available "forever". The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the url in your citation and paste it in the box on the archive.org site and click save. It creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new url to add to your original citation. If you look at one of the url's I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new url to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl= http etc|archivedate=6 November 2015}} Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regardsTwofingered Typist (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Twofingered Typist. I've used archive.org before. Recently, I'm not sure if other people are having this problem as well, but sometimes when I click "Save", it just loads a blank page. Like, it doesn't load the page with the usual "Saving" box. The page is just blank. Not sure if it's an error on my side or what. Yeepsi (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I haven't run into that. That sounds like another example of what happens when a site doesn't permit archiving. I just did your second citation and it worked fine. If you've got time, I'd still suggest you archive what you can. Cheers.Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of wikiproject tags

[edit]

Please don't replace valid wikiproject tags like you did here. Thanks --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 22:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerillero: The "|album=yes|album-importance=Low" parameters include the article as part of the Albums WikiProject (as the categories on the talk page show), albeit as part of the PHC WikiProject template. Template:WPBeatles also has these parameters as displayed here. Yeepsi (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pet Sounds tracks

[edit]

Template:Pet Sounds tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —IB [ Poke ] 14:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Live and Unplugged, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sublime. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the fabulous work you did on Mayday Parade's debut album! God, that thing brings back memories. An underground favorite of mine a few years back. I was wondering...are you planning on nominating that for GA soon, and if not, would you be interested in doing a co-nomination with me at some point? (I wouldn't want to leave you without credit, you've already done so much work on it!) I would do it soon, and I'll get back to this kind of thing eventually, but right now I'm a bit tied up with life. dannymusiceditor what'd I do now? 23:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliments @DannyMusicEditor! I've been meaning to do a little work on the article before nominating it for a while now. (I keep getting distracted by editing the article(s) for whatever I'm listening to at any given point). I'd be up for co-nominating it. No rush at the moment since you're busy with life. One thing I’ve been meaning to do is flesh out the Reception section but I haven’t had much luck trying to find a good quantity of RS reviews, let alone reviews from when it was first released. Another thing is adding archive links for the AbsolutePunk news posts (since the website has now been re-named and the old news posts don’t exist anymore). I archived the news posts a while back but haven’t added the archive links as I’ve been having trouble with the Wayback Machine (see the #Further Sky section a few messages above). Apart from that, I’d say a trip to the guild of copy editors might be in order before sending it to GAN. Yeepsi (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am also having trouble finding any more RS reviews. But it's a debut, and the band found little success with it initially, right? I think most mainstream publications wouldn't publish a review for it by the time it found success, because by then it's be a bit old and it wouldn't make sense to write about a nearly year-old release. I've seen a GA album with only a few reviews (yes, there were still more in that article), but I think this is okay. I think we should write something like "Despite its eventual success and acclaim, A Lesson In Romantics received little attention from professional music critics." (I feel like it could be better, but I'll have a C/E fix that.) dannymusiceditor what'd I do now? 23:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough then. That's a good summary. I think I have an issue of Kerrang! where a writer briefly talked about the album's place in the music scene at the time (might have been one line, can't really remember). I'll try to dig it up. Yeepsi (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Animals tracks

[edit]

Template:Animals tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ RobTalk 16:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She's all set. Nominated her this evening (CE was finished a few days ago). dannymusiceditor what'd I do now? 02:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's great to hear. Yeepsi (talk) 09:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Lesson in Romantics

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Lesson in Romantics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

@DannyMusicEditor:

Kees08 (talk) 06:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA

[edit]

Lol, same time bro [1] dannymusiceditor what'd I do now? 14:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that, amazing. Yeepsi (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victory!

[edit]

WOOOOO it passed today! Now it's time for me to pick another article to put in the nomination list; I think I'm going to put up Evanescence's debut album after it's copyedited and attempt a GT after that. But I'm still interested in collaborating with you on ADTR's Common Courtesy, Knuckle Puck's Copacetic, and both of Neck Deep's albums, if you don't nominate any of them before I do. I'd also do you Me at Six's Take Off Your Colours, but it's got some considerable lead work to be done. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 14:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic. Sure, I'd love to collab again. I've been meaning to get some of those off my to-do list for a while now, especially Common Courtesy (2.5 years+ now...). Just thought I'd mention in case you haven't seen – on the talk pages of some of those you've listed, I've added potential refs but haven't incorporated them to the articles yet. Yeepsi (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fall Out Boy

[edit]

Do you seen any immediate problems with the band's article, and how close do you think it'd be to GA? When I get to it, I think this will be my first attempt at getting a band article to GA status. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 13:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's a couple of one thing that I think needs adjusting/editing:

  • Under the AB/AP section, there's a number of one-sentence paragraphs that will need expanding and/or combining together.
  • The text under "In pop culture" is more relevant to the respective songs than the band's bio IMO.

Apart from those two points, there's a few tiny fixes I'll do in a moment. Otherwise, I'd say it's good to go. Yeepsi (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christ on a bike, Yeepsi, that's more work than I'd have possibly asked of you! Thanks a bunch! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 00:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ADTR

[edit]

[2] The hype train just hit the ceiling at my house today. It's a heavy one, by the way, if you haven't heard. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 01:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really like it. I'm hoping the new album manages to crack the top 20 on the Billboard 200. Yeepsi (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited That's the Spirit Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Reading, Mallory Knox and Beartooth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Message for Yeepsi

[edit]

Please do not change Alex Gaskarth's genres. Alex Gaskarth's genres is pop-punk, pop-rock, alternative rock, power pop and emo pop. Please do not change anything — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyhighwolf (talkcontribs) 10:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What sources do you have for the genres? Per WP:VERIFY: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." Yeepsi (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

For this--mobile editing again screwing up! Drmies (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Yeepsi (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowcard discography

[edit]

Thank you for clarifying your change by directing me to the WikiProject page. In the future, mention the WP in the original edit if the change is per the WP. It would be helpful. Jdjd021 (talk) 04:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So Sad image

[edit]

Hi Yeepsi, how's it going? Long time no speak. Just getting in touch to ask whether you'd mind if I replace a vinyl label image you uploaded for So Sad#Alvin Lee and Mylon LeFevre's version with a European pic sleeve I've found. The pic sleeve does appear in the booklet for the 2003 reissue of the Lee and LeFevre album, and I suppose I also think a sleeve of any sort is always of more use to readers than a generic face label. Are you okay with that – do you have a wish to retain the Chrysalis label? Cheers, JG66 (talk) 07:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, Y. Magic. Go well. JG66 (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:So sad no love of his own.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:So sad no love of his own.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind...

[edit]

I know what I'm doing, I assure you. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 16:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I don't mind (I assume you're referring to nom'ing it), go for it. I'm glad someone is working on the BA article, such a great record. Also, I checked the linear notes of the deluxe edtion - only studio names/studio locations are listed, no dates/timeframe (you'd think for a deluxe edition they'd mention the recording dates!). Yeepsi (talk) 17:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay one question. It is apparent that not all the reviews in the box appear in the critical reception section as prose. Is this a requirement? If so, I'll work on that tomorrow or soon after. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 20:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's preferred that whatever reviews there are in the box should be written in prose. Yeepsi (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I got a "challenge" for us, if you're up to it

[edit]

Nominate this tomorrow (its release day), and while we wait for review, expand critical reception and fix everything else while the sources are still fresh so we can continue the almost-GT of B182 albums!

Hope you got the joke, by the way, wink wink. I'd also bring Saginaw-hitchhiker into this, as he's done some massive work on the article.dannymusiceditor Speak up! 01:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got some great timing, I literally finished listening to it as I got your message (it's been out for a few hours for me). Sure, I'd be up for it. Yeepsi (talk) 01:45, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

[edit]

I started some work on articles you'd developed pretty far along, and I must say, I like it. But you don't always need a reference at the end of every sentence. There's nothing wrong with it per se, but it could get to look like an eyesore sometimes when the sentences are short enough. Take this for example, from Take Off Your Colours:

"The band began recording in spring 2008 at Outhouse Studios in Reading, Berkshire[11] over the course of two weeks.[19] Matt O'Grady and John Mitchell handled producer duties.[11] Mitchell also mixed the proceedings.[11] "Save It for the Bedroom" and "You've Made Your Bed (So Sleep in It)" were both re-recorded during these sessions. Franceschi's sister Elissa provided additional vocals on "Always Attract".[11] Tim Turan mastered the album at TuranAudio.[11]"

There's only one time another ref appears besides number 11. The second two sentences could be covered by a single reference. It could even cover the mastering, if you move it (which I think I would). I'm just saying, it doesn't have to be a ref after every period (or not, even, in this case). Thought maybe I'd say this because I learned that the hard way while putting stuff in an FAC earlier this year. '^-^ dannymusiceditor Speak up! 21:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for this, I appreciate the advice. Yeepsi (talk) 21:06, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Good Thing
added a link pointing to Saint Etienne
Kiss and Make Up (Saint Etienne song)
added a link pointing to Saint Etienne
Stars Above Us
added a link pointing to Saint Etienne

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

James Dewees

[edit]

Hi there! Earlier this year in April I took out James Dewees in the credits of Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys [3], due to him not being credited at all on the Danger Days booklet (in the list of personnel, the only keyboardist listed being Jamie Muhoberac), nor in the May Death Never Stop You booklet (Dewees only being credited on "Fake Your Death"). You reverted the edit stating that Dewees did indeed perform on Danger Days. I decided to look more into it today but I could not find anything on Dewees performing on Danger Days and am willing to remove him again from the personnel list. Is there anything that proves Dewees did indeed perform on the album before I remove him? Thank you. Sekyaw (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sekyaw:. I thought I saw this name in the Danger Days booklet previously, but I've checked just now and couldn't find his name. Guess I was mistaken. Feel free to remove him! Yeepsi (talk) 22:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 15 July

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl

[edit]

Why did you take down the upcoming CD release of the Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl? It has a new title (it is now called "Live at the Hollywood Bowl") and a new cover, but it is being released in September. Amazon is already taking orders. Check your email inbox, if you are on the Beatles mailing list, you may have already received an email announcing the release.

Marty in Boulder, 7/19/2016 2601:283:8300:7850:A85A:17A3:B1F6:7249 (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source you added – wogew.blogspot.co.uk – isn't considered a reliable source, that's why I removed it. I thought I was on the Beatles mailing list, but it appears I haven't got an email of any kind. Yeepsi (talk) 22:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What about Rolling Stone, is that not a reliable source, either? It is coming out on September 9, to coincide with Ron Howard's film, "Eight Days a Week." The cover is the movie poster. (The 1977 album will be the back cover.) The album will contain the 13 songs on the 1977 album, plus four more songs. Here is the Rolling Stone article. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/beatles-announce-new-live-at-the-hollywood-bowl-album-w429893
Marty in Boulder, 7/20/2016 2601:283:8300:7850:644D:1D77:3950:A42E (talk) 16:00, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've already added a news post by Uncut to the article earlier today. I'll added the Rolling Stone post since that has some more information. Yeepsi (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I get it. I post something. Then you take it down. The the next day, you put it back up and you get credit for it. Well, if that's how wikipedia works, I'm done with it.
Marty in Boulder 2601:283:8300:7850:644D:1D77:3950:A42E (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What? I said that wogew.blogspot.co.uk isn't a reliable source (and provided a link on how to identify reliable sources), which is why I removed it. I checked Google, but nothing turned up a reliable source until earlier this afternoon when I found the Uncut post. I formatted the bonus tracks to match the rest of the track listing as they'd look out of place otherwise. Yeepsi (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FL Candidacy

[edit]

Do you have any experience with list articles? You know I'm a big fan of rock and metal as well as punk and emo, so I'm working on the Evanescence discography. If you're able, would you mind reviewing its Candidacy for me? :) dannymusiceditor Speak up! 19:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've never commented on FLCs before, but I'll give it a shot. Yeepsi (talk) 20:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyMusicEditor: I've made some comments on the page. Yeepsi (talk) 21:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, since I resolved all your comments on this, you support the nomination now, right? dannymusiceditor Speak up! 21:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, of course! Yeepsi (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Last Night in Town original.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Last Night in Town original.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me out here

[edit]

Can you confirm the credits are correct with the liner notes to All We Know Is Falling, if you have it? dannymusiceditor Speak up! 17:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll have a look. Yeepsi (talk) 17:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done @DannyMusicEditor: Yeepsi (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You never know how much information you can find in a booklet! Awesome! Thanks! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 19:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yeepsi (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help. All the best, Miniapolis 22:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paramore album

[edit]

It honestly worked either way. My gut tells me it'd better fit where it was, but it makes all logical sense to put it where you put it. Yet it still makes me uncomfortable. Why? Because there's a reason I think it goes there that I can't quite put my finger on. But you're alright. Since I can't quite identify it you can keep it there. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 18:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was out of place since the rest of that section talks about the recording (and composition) of the album. Yeepsi (talk) 18:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tell All Your Friends

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tell All Your Friends you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 18:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somewhere Somehow

[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Somewhere Somehow has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just some music talk

[edit]

So I haven't seen you edit a lot of metal articles. Mostly pop punk and emo. But maybe you'd like to try something different. If you like ADTR's new direction, you'd like The Amity Affliction. A pretty good screamer who can kinda sing when he wants to, and a clean vocalist that appeals to ADTR fans - and they know how to balance the two. I've been really enjoying 'em lately. And they're among the most popular of post-hardcore/metalcore bands - one Platinum and two Gold albums in their home country of Australia. Fav song is "Give It All" (not a single), but their best single is probably "Pittsburgh" or "The Weigh Down". dannymusiceditor Speak up! 01:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been meaning to check them out for a while now. Since you've given some song recommendations, I'll check 'em out tonight. Cheers for this! Yeepsi (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tell All Your Friends

[edit]

The article Tell All Your Friends you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tell All Your Friends for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 14:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you were the main contributor to the article before I arrived and saw its well-developed state, I'd like to ask you to help me expand its critical reception section with the magazine references you cited. (When you have time, of course - I'm aware that you're very busy with Louder Now. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 02:00, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have access to the Kerrang! or Rock Sound review refs unfortunately, they were already in the article before I started working on it. Yeepsi (talk) 10:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh really? :( Wonder what I'd do then...do you have the AltPress issue, or still no? dannymusiceditor Speak up! 11:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Whoever added the AltPress magazine left this link thankfully. Yeepsi (talk) 11:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, didn't see that! Thanx for that at least! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 14:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Living With Ghosts DYK

[edit]

Hey there! I recently nominated The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts for DYK and credited you as an author of the article (thank you by the way). Maybe you could possibly contribute by adding/tweaking a hook? Of course you don't have to, as I mainly just wanted to inform you of the nomination. Thanks!

Nom: Template:Did you know nominations/The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts Sekyaw (talk) 03:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horizons (Parkway Drive album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comeback Kid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Havefaithinme radiosingle.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Havefaithinme radiosingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 August

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited For Those Who Have Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverstein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

[edit]

Alright, so I'm having a particularly difficult time expanding the lead on this article. It needs more info about stuff besides its commercial performance and singles. That's how I failed my first ever GAN. Can you help me out? I'll review Somewhere Somehow. :) dannymusiceditor Speak up! 00:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll help. (Give me a heads up before you start the Somewhere Somehow review as I need to add another ref from its talk page and archive links.) Yeepsi (talk) 10:54, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyMusicEditor: How about this? Yeepsi (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're officially the realest Wikipedian I know. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 04:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyMusicEditor: I've finished adding the ref, so Somewhere Somehow is ready for review whenever you've got a spare moment. Yeepsi (talk) 13:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts

[edit]

On 7 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an advance video release from The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts sparked rumors of a possible reunion tour of the American rock band My Chemical Romance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Black Parade/Living With Ghosts), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Somewhere Somehow (album)

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Somewhere Somehow (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey Y, hope you're going well. Quick question about the artist navboxes appearing in WP Beatles song articles, because I know you've done a lot of work there over the years, and you've probably got a better project-wide perspective than me: should a navbox be included when the song itself doesn't appear in the navbox? I used to assume that the inclusion of a Songs list in the template was automatically sufficient, but I've seen editors remove navboxes unless the article title appears in bold in the box. So I started doing the same with many of the George songs (figuring it was me who probably added them in the first place), but stopped when I saw that navboxes appear in R and J song articles … Any thoughts? JG66 (talk) 05:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:James McCartney has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:James McCartney, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Eat World

[edit]

Do you have Jimmy Eat World's Static Prevails? If so, would you be able to resolve a self-placed fact tag for me on the Bleed American album? I need the former album's liners. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 00:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyMusicEditor:  Done Yeepsi (talk) 11:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, one more thing: What's the serial number for Clarity? Do you literally have all these albums, or where do you find the numbers? I want all my liner citations in Bleed American to be consistent, but I added the ones in Clarity's article to begin with. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 02:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyMusicEditor: Clarity: 7243 5 39616 0 2. For every album you've asked me about so far, yeah I've got them in one physical form or another. For some album articles I've worked on, I've used Discogs [4] which occasionally has pictures of album booklets. (Apologies for late reply, I've had little internet access this past week.) Yeepsi (talk) 20:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for this! It got to GA yesterday, by the way. (Better go and update my user page!) dannymusiceditor Speak up! 20:21, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DannyMusicEditor: Got a quick question, are you any good with the |alt= parameter for the Infobox Album template? I'm in the middle of making the changes to Further Sky as per the GAN review page, but I can't come up with a good description beyond saying it's a red box with "Basement" and "Further Sky" on it. Am I overthinking things or is that fine? Yeepsi (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do have an idea of something better than that, but I don't know if it'll be approved. I will try. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 20:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Danny! Yeepsi (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What to Do When You Are Dead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Now (magazine). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Further Sky

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Further Sky you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Further Sky

[edit]

The article Further Sky you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Further Sky for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 13 Voices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Further Sky

[edit]

The article Further Sky you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Further Sky for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buddy Holly template

[edit]

Hello,

You've contributed to Buddy Holly template. There's a conflict on it and I'd like you to give your opinion. Elfast (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where You Want to Be copyedit

[edit]


Thank you! Yeepsi (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to help. Miniapolis 00:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louder Now copyedit

[edit]
Thanks again for the ce! Yeepsi (talk) 19:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Again, glad to help. All the best, Miniapolis 23:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Somewhere Somehow (album)

[edit]

The article Somewhere Somehow (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Somewhere Somehow (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 20:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Thanks for helping me with the edits on Pierce The Veil's Misadventures, sorry if I'm causing you trouble, trying to help. Wikipageedittor099 (talk) 22:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikipageedittor099: It's alright, you weren't causing any trouble. It's nice to see someone sourcing genres for once. Yeepsi (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lights and Sounds

[edit]

Thank you. I couldn't figure that one out.100.34.240.175 (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Yeepsi (talk) 11:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Yeepsi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd assume you have this one. Can you tell me what Max Helyer's role is according to the booklet? dannymusiceditor Speak up! 21:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The booklet doesn't list roles for any of the band members, simply their names. I checked both the original and reissue editions, no credits for the band at all. Yeepsi (talk) 21:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Writing's on the Wall (George Harrison song)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Writing's on the Wall (George Harrison song), Yeepsi!

Wikipedia editor Robvanvee just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great stuff!

To reply, leave a comment on Robvanvee's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I only created it as a redirect, some time ago. JG66 turned it into an article. Yeepsi (talk) 18:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I just came here to thank you for setting up that Somewhere in England track temp, Y. Nice one … But I guess I should thank Robvanvee while I'm here, too! Cheers, JG66 (talk) 05:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

[edit]

Hi. for future reference, can you use bold markup instead of semicolons? It affects screenreader users.. and also you should know that reflist|2 is depreciated wiki code. reflist|30em or 35 [for 2 columns] is preferred now. thanks. --Jennica / talk 18:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch

[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=December 12, 2016}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

[edit]
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Hope 2016 went well for you! Hope next year will be wonderful for you! dannymusiceditor Speak up! 19:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

[edit]

Hey Kees08, how'd you template this in wikimarkup? I'll send this to others too, but it'd be easier knowing this rather than copypasting the last one. dannymusiceditor Speak up! 19:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just copy/pasted one that was left on my page. The best programmer is a lazy programmer... Kees08 (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I pick up your guys' GA submissions both because the quality of the articles starts out very well, and because it fits my music style perfectly. If ever you do not want me to continue reviewing your articles, or you have GA review criticisms to give me, just let me know! Thanks! Kees08 (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Yeepsi (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Release date changes

[edit]

I have reverted your change for Milk & Kisses release date and plan to revert others. Please stop changing release dates without providing source and edit summary. Thanks. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Louder Now

[edit]

The article Louder Now you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Louder Now for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]