User talk:117daveawesome

KELT-20, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TOI-4342 b and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KELT-24 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CoRoT-26b, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 11:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:KELT-24. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 11:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:KELT-24. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KELT-24, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, welcome to WP:AFC/R. I see you are a new account, who is processing requests at Redirects for Creation. There is a problem with the requests you recently processed [1] The instructions on closure of redirect creation requests is:

You are neglecting to do

{{subst:afc redirect|accept}} ~~~~
{{afc-c|b}}

On the accepted redirect proposals you have processed. And this is breaking the request page -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome,

Thank you for creating HD 201585.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Bit of a mess. Notability is dubious, see WP:NASTRO. A starbox with zero citations isn't good either.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. Thank you for your work on Kepler-3c. User:Utopes, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

the redirect is not mentioned in the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Utopes}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome,

Please be more careful when you are considering moving an article. You shouldn't be moving an article most than once. Do not move pages on a whim, it makes it look like you don't know what you want. If you have questions about moving articles, when you should and shouldn't move a page, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:36, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're trying to do with LTT 1445Ab and its talk page, but please stop. You shouldn't use anything other than sandbox pages for testing. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:LTT 1445 Ab, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lithopsian (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from TOI-561 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 05:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of exoplanets that host stars are visible to the naked eye:Bayer designations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bad title, and is this a notable subject? Is there any reason why exoplanets would be treated differently based on the apparent magnitude of their star? Seems a random intersection of two traits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In cases like this, you can quickly get rid of the article using speedy deletion. Since you created it and are the only author, the simplest case would be to replace the content by {{db-author}}. It is quicker than PROD and less likely to be interrupted. Also, just blanking is an indication that you want the page to be deleted, but it might not get spotted. Lithopsian (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Camelopardalis (constellation) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of exoplanets with Bayer designations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bad title, and is this a notable subject? Is there any reason why exoplanets would be treated differently based on the apparent magnitude of their star? Seems a random intersection of two traits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of exoplanets with Bayer designations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exoplanets with Bayer designations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Exoplanets discovered by Kepler has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 117daveawesome. I'm SevenSpheres, and I wanted to inquire about the relationship between your account and the following ones:

• Fiddlestickers (talk · contribs)
• (90482) 2004 DW (talk · contribs)
• Cache yo (talk · contribs)

Do you operate any one of these, or do you have any other connection to any of them?? Please do not edit further until you answer this message. Thank you.  SevenSpheres (talk) 03:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the sockpuppetry policy page. SevenSpheres (talk) 03:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never got a reply here, and I question your relationship to these new accounts: Flakkersweeee (talk · contribs) and Nerdoyooo (talk · contribs) SevenSpheres (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should I open an investigation or do you want to come clean and maybe (or maybe not) we decide you've learned a valuable lesson? Lithopsian (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Permalink to the merge discussion in which all 5 accounts (these 3 + 117 + User:112.120.56.203) participated, for future reference: Talk:Upsilon Andromedae e#Merge.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SevenSpheres and Lithopsian: I'm not that familiar with WP:SPI, but shouldn't these 3 other accounts (User:112.120.56.203 excluded, as it redirects to 117's, and is clearly mentioned on 117's user page) be tagged as 117's in some way (assuming they're related, of course), lest the same WP:BADSOCK incident be repeated elsewhere, whether intentionally or carelessly? Since 117daveawesome has not yet confirmed nor denied their relationship to the other 3 accounts, after 2 months and ~1,500 edits, I think SPI is appropriate.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  19:24, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from TOI-700 d to TOI-700 e. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 19:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 55 Cancri i has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 2 § 55 Cancri i until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HD 189733 b, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Io. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

This list article has been moved to Draft:List of exoplanets with Bayer designations so you can continue working on it. You can see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of exoplanets with Bayer designations for some of the reasoning why. Most important is finding a better title (someone moved your original title of List of exoplanets that host stars are visible to the naked eye:Bayer designations to this one at one point, possibly because it was a bit confusing as a title).

You will also probably want to find a find a couple reliable sources that discuss this type of planet and maybe include a couple of examples, as that will help build a stronger consensus for keeping it in article space.

Please let me know if you need any help with any of this! —siroχo 03:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect HD 54475 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § HD 54475 until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 117daveawesome,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TOI-1431 (draft) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want TOI-1431 (draft) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Kepler-223. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done so for you this time, but hope you will follow best practices yourself next time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 117daveawesome,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, T Velorum for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect List of stars with provisional names has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 14 § List of stars with provisional names until a consensus is reached. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is unnecessary. Wikipedia:Requested articles/Natural sciences#Astronomy exists. SevenSpheres (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do some clean up in the references section. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 02:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

117daveawesome, I cleaned up the references in this article for you. The biggest problem was that you had missed closing a ref tag, which resulted in multiple template errors. Also neither of your journal sources was attributed properly: you just provided the internal variable name you had chosen for the reference as the |title= to make the URL function.

I understand you've only been here for two months, but you shouldn't leave mainspace articles in this state of disrepair. Folly Mox (talk) 13:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the proper move-procedures when making large changes, like with the {{NGC objects:1-499}} family of templates. A number of issues could have been avoided/addressed via prior discussion if you had gone through the proper channels, like the errors in documentation due to unmoved pages, the missing space after the colon in all the new template names, and (possibly) the use of en dashes in the new template names, with redirects made from keyboard-hyphenated names.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from K2-72 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: this would appear to be the 3rd request, given #Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request) above.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  18:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All righty then. — Diannaa (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/117daveawesome. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:(12346) 1993 FK25, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article b Geminorum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page disambiguating no existing Wikipedia page. Actually pages for b1 and b2 Geminorum exists (as 64 Geminorum and 65 Geminorum, but they are self-redirects to this page, which makes the disambiguation unecessary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: i known that you have been blocked and may be already logged out. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TOI-1431, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:T Puppis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of exoplanets with Bayer designations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "(12346) 1993 FK25".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TOI-1431".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 117daveawesome. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "T Puppis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Argo Navis (compact) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]