User talk:112.156.173.117

Hi, I saw that you added precise diameter values for Chaldene and Erinome in the Moons of Jupiter list. I reverted your edit because the list is supposed to have a single significant figure (one digit) for the purely-calculated diameter values (the ones with "≈" preceding the diameter values) of unmeasured irregular moons. I assume that you calculated the extra precise diameter values for Chaldene and Erinome from their absolute magnitude with albedo 0.04, but that extra precision is unwarranted for the reason I mentioned earlier. The mass value comes from the rounded diameter obviously, but I do not want the list to become overcomplicated with precise calculations. Thanks, Nrco0e (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nrco0e is a moon editor. Saturn or Jupiter or Uranus or also Neptune it can change wrong things or put more. Check it out. 112.156.173.117 (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you need copy this symbol🙂!

≠≈¢₽₩‘'`«»“"„‰•– —'¡¿"@#$&*()’”%-+=/;:,.€£¥_^[]{}§|~…\<>!? 112.156.173.117 (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits on Moons of Saturn. Firstly, the most recent diameter estimate for Atlas is 29.8 km, which comes from Thomas & Helfenstein (2020). The 30.2 km diameter you added comes from Thomas et al. (2010), which is outdated. Please see the infobox Atlas (moon) for the up-to-date physical properties of the moon. Secondly, we do not have a proper measurement for Paaliaq's diameter, so we assume an albedo of 0.04 and use that to calculate an approximate diameter from Paaliaq's absolute magnitude (H) of 11.7. That's how we get 30 km in the Moons of Saturn list; the diameter differs from other sources because they use different albedo or absolute magnitude values. But for the sake of consistency, I prefer that all calculated diameters of irregular satellites use an albedo of 0.04 and absolute magnitudes taken from MPC's Natural Satellites Ephemerides page. Nrco0e (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The figure you have quoted for West Jakarta is wrong, as you have noted so yourself. The latest official (Badan Pusat Statistik) estimate is the one for mid 2022, as shown on their website, and I am substituting this. There was, of course, no Census in 2023. The Indonesian Census is decennial, and the most recent Census was in 2020 (although BPS unfortunately mis-use the word 'Census' when they really mean 'estimate'). Rif Winfield (talk) 09:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]