Template talk:Norwegian elections

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Norway This template is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

There is an almost identical template {{Norwegian elections and referenda}}. (Update by Player 03: they are now the same; the one below redirects to this.)

One should be deleted. Those involved in creating these templates might want to confer on which one to get rid of.Inge 14:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I would say keep this one as it is part of a series (see the full list here), but then again I am the creator of all these so I am not necessarily objective :)

It is also a bit strange that there are two seperate articles on each election - one concerning the results and one a list of the MPs elected. Perhaps they could be merged somehow? Number 57 15:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to merge the two. I also agree that the articles should be merged, but I don't have the time to do that at the moment. Player 03 (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that heading is a bit strange, and somewhat misleading. Why not "Members of the Norwegian Parliament"? In day-to-day language, one wouldn't call all the mp's "winners". That would more commonly be used for the party or parties who performed best in the election.--Barend (talk) 10:20, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]