Talk:Typhoon Eli

Typhoon Eli has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 10, 2020. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Eli (1992)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can take this one on. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "known in the Philippines as Typhoon Konsing" suggest mentioning in article body so you can move this out of the lede
  • It's probably best suited for the lead tbh. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• "23 people were hurt" -> " 23 people were injured"? hurt can be a rather vague term
  • Sure. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• link Shrimp farming?
  • Sure. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• could link Coconut tree and Pepper tree?
  • Sure. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggest adding a year to the first paragraph in the body to give the reader something to anchor on
  • I mean the year is in the title but sure. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• "Following the recurvature of Typhoon Deanna on July 2" What was Typhoon Deanna? Perhaps one more sentence of introductory set-up would be apt?
  • Added a link. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• link Monsoon trough?
  •  Done. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• is there a link for 'ridging'?
  • Added. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• "with both the JTWC and JMA also analyzing a peak intensity" suggest removing 'both' because you then go on to talk about how they differ
  • Good call. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• " improved drought conditions" -> "alleviated drought conditions"?
  • Good call. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• " initial reports of 25 fishermen were" -> "initial reports of 25 fishermen"
  • Re-worded anyway because I use the word "reports" and "reported" twice in a sentence. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• source #9 is available for free here
  • Replaced. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Ref #2 could use page numbers as it's a 200+ page document
  • Added. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's all from me. The article otherwise meets GA criteria. Feel free to discuss any of these. Nice work! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Evan, This article is well written, referenced, illustrated, comprehensive and otherwise meets the GA criteria. I'm happy to pass. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]