Talk:There are unknown unknowns
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the There are unknown unknowns article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rumsfeld quote
[edit]"... it is the latter category that tend [instead of 'tends'] to be the difficult ones." Source: C-SPAN video.
And by the way: Logically his formally correct argument is a ignoratio elenchi ('missing the point'). Just in case it may be of interest. -- 14:35, 29 August 2024 2003:e2:7716:8200:b08c:6b9f:be6c:5373
Regarding the Persian poem formerly in the article ...
[edit]The author of the translation used has written a blog entry on this topic. For better or worse, it is now part of the history of this article. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Derision
[edit]I came to this article looking for who it was who had derided this perfectly clear and meaningful expression, expecting to find a list of organs that had done so. I was surprised to find just a single mention of the Foot in Mouth award (and I have added a citation from that article). I've been looking, and I can't find any other examples. What I have found is articles like this one, which states that he was "universally derided", but not (so far) an example of such derision.
I realise that much of the derision is unreliable gunk on social media, but I would have thought that at least some of the tabloids would have jumped on the bandwagon. (If the Daily Mail did so, for example, even though that is not normally a reliable source, it would surely be a reliable source about itself.)
Can anybody find any other examples, or (even better) a reliable secondary source discussing such derision? ColinFine (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- There was a television show (either TV's Bloopers & Practical Jokes or probably patterned after it) that ran ca. 2005, and as far as I remember it now, everything else on the show was either somebody messing up or somebody attempting to be hunmorous -- Donald Rumsfeld's explanation of the un/knowns was the only straight non-blooper non-intentional-joke thing which was included... AnonMoos (talk) 11:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class epistemology articles
- Low-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- Start-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- Start-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles