Talk:The Blind Leading the Blind

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	The Blind Leading the Blind is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 4, 2014.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 18, 2013 Peer review Not reviewed December 17, 2013 Peer review Reviewed January 4, 2014 Good article nominee Listed June 28, 2014 Featured article candidate Promoted Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Belgium Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disability The Blind Leading the Blind is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Has anyone noticed the text on this article recently?? I believe (and i've noticed its history too) this page is a target of vandalism relating to certain public figures, and whole text should be re-written. I'll proceed and adjust it accordingly.--Smintheus Fellin (talk) 14:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources I haven't been able to access that appear to have information on the painting:

• Bianconi, Piero (1979). Bruegel. Barron's.
• Gibson, Walter S. (1977). Bruegel. Oxford University Press.
• Marijnissen, Roger H. (1971). Bruegel. Putnam.
• Silver, Larry (2011). Pieter Bruegel. Abbeville Press. ISBN 978-0-7892-1104-0.
• Smet, Robert De, ed. (1980). Bruegel. Europalia.
• Snow, Edward (1997). Inside Bruegel: The Play of Images in Children's Games. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 978-0-86547-527-4.
• Stechow, Wolfgang (1990). Pieter Bruegel the Elder. H. N. Abrams. ISBN 978-0-8109-3103-9.

———Curly Turkey (gobble) 06:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Blind Leading the Blind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214111707/http://cir.campania.beniculturali.it/museodicapodimonte/thematic-views/image-gallery/OA900019?searchterm=bruegel&set_language=en to http://cir.campania.beniculturali.it/museodicapodimonte/thematic-views/image-gallery/OA900019?searchterm=bruegel&set_language=en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Blind Leading the Blind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140522033955/http://www.allanta.be/public/uploads/files/sr10/PRE_CSR%20met%20IQNET%20SR10_15nov2012.pdf to http://www.allanta.be/public/uploads/files/sr10/PRE_CSR%20met%20IQNET%20SR10_15nov2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should there not also be a reference to the parallel passage in Luke 6:39, as well as Matthew 15:14? AvidReader11663 (talk) 17:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Google Art project presents this painting as the one painted by Pieter Bruegel the Elder. But, this information does not seem correct to me. The painting is located at the Louvre Museum in Paris, not in Naples. So, the file represents the copy attributed to Pieter Brueghel the Younger. I modified accordingly the article, restoring the previous image.

Anyhow, on the Louvre Museum website the attribution to Pieter Brueghel the Younger is presented just as an old one. The painting is attributed more generally to the school of Pieter Bruegel the Elder. Maybe this is the source of the mistake. Harlock81 (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the Louvre is an authoritative reference. There is no evidence that the author of this copy is Brueghel the Younger. Yann (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is not. The attribution to Brueghel the Younger is a dated one, reported as such on the Louvre page. The article should be corrected accordingly. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A dated one means that this attribution is wrong. Sure, it is a copy of the painting from Capodimonte, but attributing it to Brueghel the Younger is certainly wrong. Yann (talk) 14:03, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But, I'm not attributing the painting to Brueghel the Younger. The article presents this information referring to an art book.

Also, the dated attribution may also be in use to distinguish the copy from the original, as the one once attributed to Brueghel the Younger - as it commonly happens for artworks. For sure, no one attributes this copy to Bruegel the Elder. So, the substitution of the image as the main picture of the painting was wrong. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]