Talk:Silence procedure

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Came here to see how to put silence is agreement as I have seen before. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what I am trying to emulate: [From the F-35 page] Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II.

A deafening silence. Can I have some reaction please? Irondome (talk) 03:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SILENCE - Ahunt (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. I have never seen that section before, thanks. I am assuming there is a form of tacit consent here. I have been around long enough now that fellow eds should know big disruptive eds are not my style. Grateful for response Irondome (talk) 15:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An example of 'Silence is Agreement' (at least not objecting.) -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]