Talk:Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rome This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance). Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

hi! the page in Portuguese show better pictures IMO (gallery). maybe they might be used here too. what do you think?Tetraktys-English 08:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC)\[reply]

A move from the familiar Santa Maria in Aracoeli to "Basilica of Saint Mary of the Altar of Heaven" [sic], which is absolutely guaranteed to hide the article from any Wikipedia reader who is even remotely familiar with Rome or with art history. Here's a prime example of unwarranted self-confidence too arrogant to discuss such a change with those who have actually contributed content. Made more offensive by waving a link to a Wikipedia guideline as an attack weapon. The worst example of bad behavior I've seen in the past week. No doubt I shall now be assaulted with WP:CIV, which is virtually never brandished by those who act with genuine civility. --Wetman (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So move it back then! But why does the lead refer to the Basilica of St. Mary of the Altar of Heaven? — Blue-Haired Lawyer 22:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the article itself did and still begins with the English title, I had assumed that someone had decided to use English but hadn't bothered to move the article or didn't know how to. Which does happen! I did not make an irreversible move or brandish any kind of "attack weapon". I just briefly explained my reasons by citing the appropriate policy. There are plenty of article about places in Rome which use the English names.

I won't cite the policies you're just broken, but I will say that this unnecessary, bitter, spiteful personal attack made by an editor I've never even encountered before really is the worse behaviour I've ever seen on Wikipedia (and I've been editing for three years). — Blue-Haired Lawyer 20:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basilica of Santa Maria in Ara Coeli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721222017/http://www.vicariatusurbis.org/Ente.asp?ID=887 to http://www.vicariatusurbis.org/Ente.asp?ID=887

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]