Talk:SCR-508

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force Military science, technology, and theory task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War I task force

Why would they waste space and weight installing six dynamotors for one transceiver? One per output voltage seems more plausible. One unit with two output windings would have been even more efficient. Ref needed for this claim. 75.34.24.145 (talk) 19:46, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the confusion. only one dyno is installed in a component. the input voltage is dependant on the vehicle output. so for a 12volt vehicle you would plug in the 12 volt dyno. the receiver component and the transmitter component are stand alone.Brian in denver (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]