Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Rather Die Young

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRather Die Young has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rather Die Young/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sauloviegas (talk · contribs) 00:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]
Resolved comments

  • "RMC Studio and Enormous Studios, (Los Angeles)" The track wasn't recorded there, was it? It wasn't according to Conception.

Lead

[edit]
Resolved comments

  • "criticizing its chorus which, according to them, forms the major part of the song." I'm a little lost here. Why would they criticize it if it forms the major part of the song? They criticized it because of what? The composition or the lyrics?
  • Actually, if you look at the lyrics, you will find out that what she does for most of the part is repeating the chorus. Well, I did my best. Please let me know if you think we can phrase this better. I will be very happy. :) Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:23, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conception

[edit]
Resolved comments

  • I think that this should be retitled. As with other articles from songs of 4, it should be either "Background and development" or "Background and production", because I don't see what this has to do with the conception: "Beginning on June 16 to June 27, 2011, the songs from 4 were available to listen to in full each day on Knowles' official website, paired with its accompanying photo spread from the album packaging and an insightful quote..." Be consistent, because each article has a different title regarding this same section.

Composition and lyrical interpretation

[edit]
Resolved comments

  • Missing sources on the sample's description.

References

[edit]
Resolved comments

  • Ref 1 archive date.

Summary

[edit]