Talk:Peter Jensen (bishop)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Christianity: Anglicanism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance). University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance Peter Jensen (bishop) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Peter Jensen (bishop) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Correction on Reference 3 is required as when I clicked on it this evening it led to the telegraph.co.uk home page. Nothing on Peter Jensen there.Jackandkira (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the article, you'd scarcely think Jensen was a controversial figure, since the contents are relentlessly positive. I know Australian Anglican clergy, and have heard much (albeit anecdotally) that would suggest his actions are decidedly more mixed, and that he is as divisive a personality domestically as he is in worldwide Anglicanism. Could someone with local knowledge impose some balance? Fishhead64 16:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article cites only one source and it is relevant to once specific point. Unless the rest is cited it will become necessary to remove all uncited material, in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines.

Local knowledge: If Wiki is to handle any controversy in a neutral way here, it should consider Peter Jensen as a leading figure within a larger historical and social context. It is true that Peter is sometimes associated with controversy, because he is willing to actively represent the concerns and interests of conservative evangelical Anglicanism. However, without playing down his personal responsibility for this, objective evidence for Sydney diocese as a conservative evangelical branch of Anglicanism since inception is well documented. Evangelicals in England deliberately lobbied to send Richard Johnson as chaplain with the First Fleet of European settlement to Australia. Sydney has a continuous history of this branch of Anglicanism being dominant (although not unchallenged).

Reliable sources should exist to document that Sydney Anglicans, Peter Jensen among them, started taking a pro-active role in lobbying for evangelicalism, first among diocese within Australia (late 1980s), later across the whole Anglican communion (late 1990s). This lobbying pre-dates Peter's appointment as arch-bishop, and involved several other key figures from the diocese. To some extent, Peter's appointment reflects a broad mandate to continue persuit of such evangelical lobbying. Peter's voice undoubtedly has helped shape contemporary Sydney Anglicanism, however, he represents more than just his own opinions, he also reflects the Sydney traditions that actually shaped Jensen himself (Hammond and Knox), and many Sydney Anglicans who have also been shaped by the same tradition.

It is probably worthy of note that evangelicalism in Sydney is not strictly limited to Anglicanism. Australia has little tradition of Christianity, and so evangelicals willing to co-operate across denominations on the basis of their evangelicalism have probably had disproportionately more influence than one might expect in other cities and social contexts.

The rationales, both theological and methodological, and also the names of key players in Sydney evangelicalism have been published continuously in The Briefing over the course of a couple of decades. Briefing articles are catechetical, not neutral, so they provide a good "inside look" at what lies behind the Sydney evangelical POV in various notable public events and debates.

Best wishes to anyone willing to write this up. Alastair Haines (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 22:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• the link for the removal is at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Jensen&action=historysubmit&diff=276615006&oldid=273182901 The text is probably not worth reinserting even with a reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Jensen (bishop). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anglicanmediasydney.asn.au/synod2002/presidential_address.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]