Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Nahikari García

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nahikari García/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I should have this done by Sunday JAGUAR  11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead needs expanding quite a bit to summarise the article's body
    " The programme wasn't solely football based" - was not
    "She ended the campaign with 10 goals to her name for the season" - can this have a citation?
    "García has worn the number 7 jersey for both club and country" - missing word?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The lead definitely needs expanding before I can promote this. I also picked out a couple of minor issues but other than that the article is solid. JAGUAR  18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jaguar, thanks a lot for the review of this article, and for the others you assisted with. It is greatly appreciated. I have extended the lede a bit. Let me know if that is enough. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for expanding the lead! There's nothing else outstanding, so I'll promote this now. It's generally well written and comprehensive for the subject. JAGUAR  10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]