Talk:List of calligraphers

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

All these calligraphers are already present in Wikipedia. All but a small number even have individual articles. Therefore, I am removing the ref.-needed notices. Kdammers 01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was a manual list of calligraphers already present on Wikipedia. I converted this to a redirect to the calligraphers category, which automatically creates a dynamic list of all calligraphers. Maintaining a manual list is kind of pointless as this can be done automatically. Lexlex (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree for reasons given Saga City (talk) 07:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is useless and more trouble than it's worth. I agree with Lexlex. Asoer (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How does a category automatically create a list? I would like to know for possible use with other subjects.Kdammers (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think a list of calligraphers is useful, but I think it would make the calligraphy article (there is not calligrapher article) too messy.Kdammers (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]