Talk:Labrang Monastery

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tibet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Buddhism High‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article mentions 2000 monks in residence. The article at Alexander Berzin's site suggests there are around 500. I wonder whether anyone has more up-to-date information, both on the number of monks and the status of the monastery as a centre of education? I visted this monastery very briefly during the summer of 2001. At that time I would have said there were less even than 500 monks and very little in the way of educational activity. I befriended some monks who spoke a bit of English and Chinese. I stumbled upon them watching Hong Kong gangster flicks and eating strawberries and yack dumplings in a little room in the town outside the monastery while looking for a guesthouse. Later we went hiking around the monastery, drank tea in their dorm rooms, and discussed the feasibility of their making illegal border crossings into India to pursue education. The impression they gave me was that their opportunities in China were limited. I toured the monastery but saw very little activity of any sort.霊村 11:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to a recent blog [1], the monastery is home to almost 1200 monks. 81.249.183.178 (talk) 20:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to: Dorje, Gyurme (2009). Footprint Tibet Handbook, p. 800. Footprint Publications, Bath, England. ISBN 978 1 906098 32 2, at its height it "housed 4,000 monks, and when the Fifth Jamyang Zhepa passed away in 1947 there were 300 geshes, 3,000 monks and 50-100 incarnate lamas. The present incumbent, the Sixth Jamyang Zhepa, who lives in Lanzhou, presides over a much depleted monastery where there are barely 1,000 monks, of whom half are engaged in the study of dialectics and the rest in tantic meditation practice." Hope this solves the mystery for you. John Hill (talk) 06:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: Survey of Buddhist temples and monasteries. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://austrosinoartsprogram.org/blog/joseph-francis-rock-photographs-and-writings

http://issuu.com/mazine.ws/docs/asap_katal_2010

http://www.wildchina.com/blog/2010/09/exploring-joseph-rocks-china/

Rajmaan (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://books.google.com/books?id=O2PYAAAAMAAJ&q=paul+kocot+nietupski&dq=paul+kocot+nietupski&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fOq0U9iOEdG3yATt_YH4BA&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAQ

http://books.google.com/books?id=cHryv3kiwzoC&printsec=frontcover&dq=paul+kocot+nietupski&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fOq0U9iOEdG3yATt_YH4BA&ved=0CBQQ6AEwAA

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labrang Monastery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110130064230/http://asiaharvest.org/pages/profiles/china/chinaPeoples/A/AmdoRongmahbrogpa.pdf to http://www.asiaharvest.org/pages/profiles/china/chinaPeoples/A/AmdoRongmahbrogpa.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]