Talk:K-13 (missile)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Rocketry This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Soviet Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The specs table at the bottom of the page and the specs in the infobox have conflicting data for the R-13M variant, when it comes to weight and wingspan. Unfortunately, there are no sources for either. Should the conflicting info be removed, or a "Citation needed" added?
Diego bf109 (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The second sentence is said to require a citation. However the article later details the claim and cites a source. The original webpage is lost however the archived version clearly says what is stated in this page. I have never edited wikipedia before so I don't know how to update citations properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.93.178 (talk) 23:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for highlighting this problem with the lede. I have removed the template, since the statement seems to be supported by multiple sources in the body of the article. MPS1992 (talk) 23:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have photos of a museum placard that provide information about the AIM-9/AA-2 interchangability. Nkuzmik (talk) 14:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no evidence but I have heard that the Finnish Air Force has test fired both an K-13 from a Draken and AIM-9 from a MiG-21, when both missiles were in use in Finland.--91.156.192.173 (talk) 18:10, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on K-13 (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304041942/http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-2.htm to https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on K-13 (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121218122830/https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/ehowes/www/fa/Timeline.htm to https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/ehowes/www/fa/Timeline.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:No original research we can't include this without a reliable source saying it has been used. Frankly all you have are a blurry set of pixels that one guy on NCD said were a K-13. Even if we were to throw out are standards we'd at least want UAWeapons or something.©Geni (talk) 02:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]