Talk:Irish Republican Army (1922–1969)

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Irish republicanism Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWikipedia:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey everyone I just currently added additional information to the Post-WWII IRA section, though I added a significant amount of information there still could be improvements made. For example, there could be more information added to the power vacuum the IRA experienced during this time period. Furthermore, I think there could be more information added to the Border campaign and traditionalist nationalism. I'm interested to see how this wiki page improves in the coming months. 130.74.163.250 (talk) 19:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• IRA.Coventry.attack.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above section in the article is inaccurate and ahistorical. Yes there was an emerging band of fascists in the IRA at the time however these were one of many factions within the IRA, the others being the Communists, the Liberals and the Conservatives. The IRA had a smorgasbord of ideologies at this time, of which fascism was one of many and in fact was a minority position.PailSimon (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed or amended various headings, including that one. I have no objection to them being restored with a more neutral wording if deemed necessary. I realise some content may still need to be added to the Russell section that contained that one. FDW777 (talk) 11:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]