Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:HMS Regulus (1785)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Regulus (1785)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 22:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • ...taking soldiers to the Hanover Expedition in 1805.: the "to" implies a place/destination, which "Hannover Expedition" isn't.
  • When the wars ended...: suggest rewording due to potential confusion between War of 1812 and Napoleonic Wars.

Design

  • Regulus was a 44-gun, 18-pounder Roebuck-class ship.: Because you mention 1769 in the next sentence I wonder for a bit of additional context you should say something like ...Roebuck-class ship that was completed in 1785.
  • From 1751 to 1776 only two ships of this type...: should that be From 1769 to...? This is referring to the design of 1769 isn't it?

Construction

  • Inconsistency between text and infobox regarding the number of guns on the upper deck in 1793.

English Channel

  • No issues spotted

Jamaica Station

  • The vessels captured were a ship, brig, and armed schooner.: it seems odd that a ship was captured...anyhoo, shouldn't be "a brig, and an armed schooner"?

More to come. Zawed (talk) 09:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]