Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Globovisión

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV

[edit]

I have tagged this article for the following reasons:

-Attributing and substantiating biased statements

-People say... is used multiple times in this section.

-Let the facts speak for themselves

-We have several critical citation needed's in the section. Several statements need citations but aren't even marked.
-The cited Post article is somewhat taken out of context. I think it can stay, but the full context should be given.

I know it is virtually impossible to even find an NPOV media source about this, but we can do better here. It may also improve the balance of this section. I think a stronger structure delineating the issues may help. I haven't done any real work yet, but I'll try to help too. Alfredo22 (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV again

[edit]

The articles linked here barely scratch the surface of showing how POV the "Criticism and controversies" and "Invesigation" sections of this article are. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you have added all simply quote the U.S. Govt. or U.S.-funded NGOs. Is this what NPOV means now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.205.18 (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Globovisión. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Globovisión. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Racism"?

[edit]

Hi @WMrapids:. Could you please provide the quote originally used to back the content for this edit:[1]? There was a single instance in 2004 where a Globovisión talk show was criticized for comparing Chávez to Robert Mugabe. Does the source state this was a generalized issue? Regards, NoonIcarus (talk) 00:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is what was in the source. Not much to explain. WMrapids (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. What is the original phrase in the source? --NoonIcarus (talk) 02:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]