Talk:Fuecoco

	Fuecoco has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Fuecoco is part of the List of generation IX Pokémon series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 15, 2024 Good article nominee Listed October 10, 2024 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance). Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants) Train simulator (disambiguation) (6 participants) Preston Arsement (2 participants) Jackpot World (1 participant) Bejeweled Stars (5 participants) Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted) Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted) Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted) Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver 1 & 2 Remastered (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) 2024 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (discussion) 2023 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (discussion) Harvest Moon DS: Sunshine Islands (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Neo Geo Pocket (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted (nom) The Suicide of Rachel Foster (nom) Claire Redfield (nom) Pokémon episodes removed from rotation (nom) Donkey Kong (nom) Yoshi's New Island (nom) Good article nominations Tina Armstrong (start) Kim Kitsuragi (start) Miner 2049er (start) Pixel Piracy (start) Dr Disrespect (nom) The Outer Worlds (nom) River Raid (start) The Great Giana Sisters (start) Haunter (Pokémon) (start) Bit City (start) Dendy (start) Dark Urge (start) Pokémon Scarlet and Violet (start) Jeanette Voerman (start) Crono (start) Deathloop (start) Quiver (video game) (start) Regi (Pokémon) (start) Ridley (Metroid) (start) Blast Wind (start) Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) DYK nominations No did you know nominations Reviews and reassessments Pokémon Channel (nom) A Space for the Unbound (rev) Wild Arms (video game) (nom) Bejeweled (video game) (rev) Articles that need... assessment (1) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (7) infoboxes (12) cover art (252) screenshots (8,880) photos (65) translation from japan (188) creation merging Pokémon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

I don't know where I should start this convo, so I decided to start it here. Some of the pokémon articles feature evolutions/related pokémon as co-subjects. Shouldn't this be for at least a majority of the single subject articles for consistency? XCBRO172 (talk) 07:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's only really the case if there's a lot of discussion over Fuecoco as an evolutionary line. In the case of Magikarp and Gyarados, Gyarados was merged to Magikarp rather than redirected to the list because it was decided that Gyarados' notability was largely linked to the fact that pretty much all notability discussion about Gyarados was that it evolved from Magikarp. For Sprigatito and Popplio, there was a reasonable amount of commentary about Sprigatito and Popplio's evolutions and how they changed. For Fuecoco, there's a little bit of discussion on Skeledirge, but nearly enough to justify making the article about the evolutionary line. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 08:11, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for explaining. XCBRO172 (talk) 08:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to help - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Arconning (talk) 06:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA toolbox
Copyvio detector Authorship External links
Reviewing
Templates Criteria Instructions

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fuecoco/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 02:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will review this! Comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999 @Cukie Gherkin Here are my short comments, hope they can be addressed. :) Arconning (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arconning I believe I've addressed all relevant prose issues. I additionally found an Inverse source to replace the CBR source. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999 @Cukie Gherkin One more issue, the CBR source is still used in the article. Hope this can be fixed. :) Arconning (talk) 07:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arconning fixed, apologies for missing that. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS

[edit]

• Mentions of Fire type, Ghost typing, and similar words should be hyphenated.

Lead and infobox

[edit]

• No issues.

Conception and development

[edit]

• Just add a little comma after the player assumes the role of a Pokémon Trainer.

Appearances

[edit]

• No issues.

Critical reception

[edit]

• No issues.

Image

[edit]

• Image present is on a free use license which makes sense in this situation.

Refs

[edit]

• Earwig seems good!
• Random ref check: 1, 7, 11, 14, 18, good.
• After a consensus was made, reference 4 should probably be replaced as it's unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Valnet. Though I'll give a situational pass if there aren't any other sources, as some editors have also deemed it situational per information given. Let me know if you've seen any other reference that could be of us
• Conditional passes on references mentioning ScreenRant.

Misc

[edit]

• No ongoing edit war, focused and broad information regarding the topic, neutral.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

IF HE GETS AN ARTICLE AND SPRIGQTITO HET AN ARTICLE THEN WHY DOES QUAXLY NOT? I understand he’s not as notable as the other starters, but compared to the other ones, no one seems to care about him. Please make an article for Quaxly. Oh. And while you’re at it, make articles for all the starters from every generation and all their evolutions. PRIORITIES Decidueye Incineroar INFERNAPEINFERNAPE!!! Cinderace Inteleon Feraligatr --PyukumukuAce (talk) 14:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PyukumukuAce hello. Firstly, please do not make demands on what editors should or shouldn't make. Editors have their own projects they work on in their own time, and while I cannot speak on if Quaxly has enough independent coverage for an article or not, a lot of the Pokemon you've listed above likely don't. Which Pokemon have articles is not something editors choose to include or not based on preference: it's based on the existence of coverage in independent, reliable sources, discussing them separately from the subject. It's a tricky thing to figure out, but as it stands, I would suggest familiarizing yourself with policies such as Wikipedia:GNG and Wikipedia:SIGCOV in order to figure out how we determine the "notability"- or in other words which subjects get separate articles or not- of a given subject. I hope this helps. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]