Talk:Functor

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics High‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles High This article has been rated as High-priority on the project's priority scale.

Archives

Archive 1

I'm having trouble with the paragraph beginning "There is a convention which refers to "vectors"...

I think it's easily shown to be wrong with a scalar example. Suppose the change of basis is ${\displaystyle x'=\lambda x}$. Then the dual transformation is ${\displaystyle \omega '=\lambda ^{-1}\omega }$. And in higher dimensions, a change of basis ${\displaystyle \mathbf {x} '={\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}\mathbf {x} }$ induces the dual transformation ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega }}'={\boldsymbol {\omega }}{\boldsymbol {\Lambda }}^{-1}}$. (Note: this verifies the invariance of the contraction ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\omega }}'\mathbf {x} '={\boldsymbol {\omega }}\mathbf {x} }$ under a change of basis) This correction can remediate the third sentence of the paragraph, as well.

The fourth/final sentence is correct, although the terminological confusion might be explained by the fact that, while the pull-back of the cobasis ${\displaystyle (\mathbf {e} ^{j})}$ transforms contravariantly, the components of a covector (with respect to its cobasis) transform covariantly, and vice versa for the basis and components of a vector.--ScriboErgoSum (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]