Talk:Four Courts

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ireland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The second photograph needs shrinking. Unfortunately I don't have the ability to do that here. (It is too nice to crop, as you would lose much of the detail.) I have asked Mav to crop it if he gets the time. STÓD/ÉÍRE 23:52 Apr 2, 2003 (UTC)

Done, I made two different smaller versions, [[Four-courts-statue-medium.jpg]] and [[Four-courts-statue-small.jpg]], and put the medium one in for now. Smaller one's there if anyone feels it's necessary. -- John Owens 00:24 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)

Hmm, it's not quite clear from what you said above if you thought cropping or shrinking was the right thing to do. Looking at it some more, I think it wouldn't hurt to lose some of the ceiling at the top, and maybe a little off the sides. If you'd rather it were that way, just give the word and I'll try that. -- John Owens

Thanks for doing it. No, I think cropping would be a bad idea. All decorative features were lost so it is worth showing all that the photo shows. It is an aspect of the interior of the building that at this probably nobody alive ever saw (if kids before 1922 did and are still alive, they were probably too young to remember) STÓD/ÉÍRE 00:31 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)

OK, it was just when you "asked Mav to crop it" that I began to doubt if that's what you'd meant. :) And I see someone knows how to fit it into the text better; I'll have to take a look how that's done. But I must point out, my grandfather was 20 in 1922, and he's still around. ;) Never heard of him having been to Ireland, though. -- John Owens

Opps. Did I say crop? Mea culpa. STÓD/ÉÍRE 22:58 Apr 3, 2003 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Four Courts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110627091858/http://www.cainteoir.com/cainteoir_files/gramadach/Uimhreacha.pdf to http://www.cainteoir.com/cainteoir_files/gramadach/Uimhreacha.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061006121711/http://www.courts.ie/courts.ie/library3.nsf/PageCurrent/F8280C1F8A2E6F2980256F20004F7A58?opendocument to http://www.courts.ie/courts.ie/library3.nsf/PageCurrent/F8280C1F8A2E6F2980256F20004F7A58?opendocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At what point should the digital reconstruction project - here 'and many other places' be included? (There is enough material to make a start and reference it.) Jackiespeel (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]