Talk:English plurals

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. English Language This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3

The Wiktionary entries indicate that hose is uncountable (for 2. A stocking-like garment worn on the legs; pantyhose) while pantyhose or its synonym tights are plural only.

Yet, Collins Concise English Dictionary shows both "hose, hosen" as the plural forms of hose, and seems to imply that it's also a synonym of hosiery ("stockings, socks, and tights collectively").

According to Microsoft® Encarta® 2009, (panty)hose is a plural noun itself as is tights or oats (the e and unlike, say, "sheep (plural sheep)" or hose in its meaning of "flexible tube", which shows the usual plural hoses.

All this information is at odds, so it's impossible to know what pair "hose - hosen" the article is referrring to. --Backinstadiums (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to the entry of letter e; therefore, is this then a regular plural formed from -es? --Backinstadiums (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• English-English dictionaries and thesaurus books.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that 'alumni' in anglicized pronunciation is the same as 'alumnae' in "Italianate" pronunciation. This is not true. It is in classical, not Italianate, Latin that "alumnae" would sound the same as English "Alumni". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.243.220.61 (talk) 04:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]