Talk:Ealhswith

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. English Royalty Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 5, 2019.

Added her year of death. 24.31.169.252 (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a better reason than "unjustified" for not mentioning noteworthy, referenced appearances of this historic person in cultural depictions, like in thousands of other articles on historical subjects. You need to provide reasons why this this article should be special. I see none.

CapnZapp (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please browse any of the following sources [1] [2] [3] [4] apart from reference sources like the show's home page on Netflix, imdb etc. CapnZapp (talk) 16:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many articles list similar cultural depictions because, unfortunately like much of Wikipedia, no one has deleted material which does not comply with the rules. No such mention would pass in a Featured article. A discussion of cultural representations based on reliable secondary sources is relevant as in John, King of England#Popular representations, and if you have a number of depictions then you could create an article similar to Cultural depictions of John, King of England, but a statement that an actor played a historical character does not tell us anything about the character, only about the actor, and is therefore not relevant to this article. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What rule against inclusion do you refer to? Source please. Your notion that a wholly separate article needs to be created just to include depictions in cultural medua is absurd. We have lots of article; you just don't like it for this one. CapnZapp (talk) 11:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rmkooist (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rmkooist (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will adding some information found from both primary and secondary sources that discuss Ealhswith's character and contributions to the Anglo-Saxon throne. Rmkooist (talk) 19:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]