Talk:Consecration of the Ram Mandir

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hinduism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Ram Mandir on 20 January 2024. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Not merged.

As suggested by @I'm tla, I have cleaned up the article. Thank you for suggesting. EEverest 8848 (talk) 06:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning it up. I still see some small issues, so I'll deal with that. TLA (talk) 06:59, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, there are some issues with the wording here that I think would be best if another editor more experienced with this kind of topic to cleanup. I'll re-add the cleanup tag. TLA (talk) 07:01, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should capitalize all letters in the title. A move to "Ram Mandir Prana Pratishta" should be made. PrathuCoder (talk) 19:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Exactly, this should have been the title from the very beginning. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of this section listing all the prominent people invited is indiscriminate (see WP:INDISCRIMINATE). While the list is verifiable, it does not merit inclusion as knowing the attendees of any event, however prominent, does not add any encyclopedic value. I propose the section, Invitees "Attendees", be removed in its entirety. Lord Clayton7 (talk) 10:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Clayton7 Just to inform you the list is now changed from Invitees to Attendees. You might want to change your suggestion. ShaanSengupta^Talk 11:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing. I have updated my suggestion accordingly, because irrespective of the name change the section still does not merit inclusion. Lord Clayton7 (talk) 11:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lord Clayton7 I have a question regarding your view of the list being "indiscriminative". The policy of WP:INDISCRIMINATE that you gave mentions WP:LISTN and WP:LISTCRITERIA in its 3rd point. Both define how a list should be made. It says redlink names (subjects without wiki article) should not be mentioned. And WP:N should be followed with reliable sources. I see the list is following all of this. Then how is it "indiscriminative". ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shaan Sengupta Sorry for the delayed response. The policy states that to provide encyclopedic value, contextual explanations that are sourced independently must be provided and that verifiability (WP:VERIFY) does not guarantee inclusion.

The inclusion of this list, while reliable, does not add any encyclopedic value and thus does not merit inclusion. Lord Clayton7 (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]