Talk:Chungking Express

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hong Kong: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Hong Kong Cinema (assessed as Low-importance). Hong Kong To-do: edit history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (21) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (1,053) Image needed (348) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,473) • Stub-Class articles (6,692) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340) Film: Chinese / Core This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force. This article is on the project's core list.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Was "Dreams" is played several times? I remembered it to be only as end theme song. --Menchi (Talk)â 09:26, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)

The song is "Dream Person" (not "Dreams") by Faye Wong. It can be found on her album "Random Thoughts". Visit the Faye Wong page on Wikipedia for more information. The song plays when Faye is cleaning the apartment, and as well at the end of the film. Her song "Know Oneself and Each Other" (also found on "Random Thoughts") is as well in the movie very briefly during one of the bar sequences when Tony is sitting by the jukebox. Jason Gervais 17:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Kaneshiro Takeshi" and "Wong Faye" aren't the english/western ways of putting their names. In English they're known was Takeshi Kanesiro and Faye Wong. I'd think it'd be logical to change the names to this because Tony Leung Chiu-Wai and Wong Kar Wai in put into "western" form.

Also should it be mentioned that WKW filmed two additional stories that were intially planned to be told in Chungking Express, but were left out and fleshed out to form Fallen Angels. It also features Takeshi Kaneshiro. The story takes place in the same universe and has the same themes as Chungking Express.

Referring to your second paragraph: It's actually only one additional story, not two. Jason Gervais 17:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFYI, Wong Kar Wai is not the "western" form. Timmyshin (talk) 11:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction gives two different literal translations of the Chinese title: Chungking Forest and Chungking Jungle. Someone who knows Chinese should correct whichever is wrong. In case there's a problem differentiating the two English words, a forest is a general term for a large tract of land in any climate which is covered with trees and undergrowth but which is not typically impenetrable. A person might fairly easily go for a casual walk through a forest. A jungle, in contrast, is typically in a tropical or at least very humid climate and has much denser vegetation than a forest, so dense that it is practically impenetrable; walking through a jungle would take a considerable amount of effort. Jungle is a more dramatic word than forest, so I would think it might be preferable, but since the intention is to give the literal meaning of the Chinese word, someone who knows Chinese well should make the correction.--Jim10701 (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

森林 can mean either Forest or Jungle. 220.255.1.131 (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chungking Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118163414/http://home.earthlink.net/~ajdlro/chungking.html to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chungking_express/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chungking Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927133955/http://www.berlinale-talentcampus.de/story/96/1596.html to http://www.berlinale-talentcampus.de/story/96/1596.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yo. I find it a bit rich to be accused of "vindictive and unconstructive editing" when the very edit being undone was a compromise: keeping the information about the two-story structure while trimming the fluff.

Speaking of fluff:

"Except for a brief moment when the first story ends and the second begins, the two stories do not interconnect.

However, the three main characters from the second story each momentarily appear during the first."

is not important to plot and should be omitted. We're just trying to summarise the events of the film here, there's no need for a breakdown about "brief moments" when scenes overlap or which characters momentarily appear or whatever. See WP:PLOT, which states: "The plot summary is an overview of the film's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail." Popcornduff (talk) 14:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Popcornduff – I just saw the absence of subsection headings and lazily assumed you undid my edit entirely. I apologise. It's fine to edit for brevity but I think a bit of extra context is sometimes worth some wordiness too. Citobun (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for being one of the 1% of pissed-off Wiki editors who admits when they made a mistake (a 1% I sadly do not always belong to myself). As per my explanation above I've removed the information I consider superfluous again; I don't think we need to say the stories both involve heartbroken police officers when exactly this is explained in the summary itself. Popcornduff (talk) 14:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing removal of semi-pro review by James Berardinelli plus addition of other reviews equal in status to Roger Ebert and Sight & Sound.

• "Prolific" output by a writer can be applauded, but the purpose of the Critical Reception section is to show the range of reviews which had impact on the success/popularity of the film. The inclusion of this quote by "not a professional movie reviewer" seems self-serving. ^[1]
  
• Rolling Stone, Variety, New York Times would be justified additions, especially to demonstrate the film's varying range of praise and criticism. ^[2]
  

GimmeChoco44 (talk) 08:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moving forward on revising critical response list. GimmeChoco44 (talk) 09:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can see, his name 何志武 in pinyin should be He Zhiwu, not He Qiwu as written in the article. Can anyone else confirm this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.0.186.38 (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]