Talk:Bidford-on-Avon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Warwickshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The climate data provided seem to be those for those for Ragley Hall. Is this really appropriate? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I told you before, Ragley Hall is the nearest station to Bidford-on-Avon. Even if there was a weather station in Bidford-on-Avon, the nearest climate data would be for Pershore.--Aercus3 (talk) 18:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly when and where did you tell me that? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aercus3, you appear to be a sockpuppet of User:Weathereditor and I have reported you here. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source seems appropriate to me, added it back on.2A02:C7F:C82D:FD00:A105:1CE0:B9D5:BA5E (talk) 11:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder do you have any knowledge of editors Aercus3 and Weathereditor? It seems coincidental that you should have added to this three-year-old thread and not started a completely new one? I'm sure you wouldn't mind a check-user checking your IP details alongside those other two, would you? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any truth in the legend that Shakespeare died of a fever caught drinking at the Falcon at Bidford (I believe with a group of fellow poets)?Cloptonson (talk) 15:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't much truth in most legends, is there? That's why they're legends. There is an interesting little newspaper article here, but no mention of fever or death? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bidford-on-Avon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610110145/http://www.stratford-herald.com/37747-bidfords-historic-bridge-closed-after-crash.html to http://www.stratford-herald.com/37747-bidfords-historic-bridge-closed-after-crash.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517030729/http://www.bidfordbaptistchurch.org.uk/ to http://www.bidfordbaptistchurch.org.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110625155239/http://www.bidfordgardens.org/ to http://www.bidfordgardens.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]