Talk:BMW 5 Series

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Automobiles High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bavaria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Most of models have been decline on version most sporty by the division Motorsport, called BMW M5." Is this some kind of translation problem?

This article says that the 5-Series is manufactured in Germany. Has there been any exceptions to this? SamH|Talk 18:07, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

There are probably CKD models assembled in countries with high tariffs for imports. --202.7.190.131 12:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ive added the CTS-V. But Im having 2nd thoughts. Is it a competitor ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.93.174.106 (talk) 09:41, 18 April 2005

To be honest, the competitors sections have always made me a bit nervous—they're subjective and generally suffer from list bloat. In fact, looking through my Watchlist, something similar has just happened to the Audi A4 page. It takes a keen editor to keep these trimmed and meaningful, and in general, I lean towards dumping them altogether.

That being said, the CTS-V was designed to compete directly with the M5, and the entire CTS line seems positioned similarly to the 5. The CTS seems like a reasonable addition here. --Milkmandan 13:12, 2005 Apr 18 (UTC)

The 550i is now a reality in the E60 line but I don't know enough about it to add it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.228.239 (talk) 05:40, 25 November 2005

The "Active" or "Active Comfort" seat, already available on the flagship 7 series, is made available on driver and front passenger seats of the newly engineered 5 Series in many markets. The Active seat is an innovative motion comfort system invented by Richard D. Harza, renowned civil engineer and former Chairman of the Harza Engineering Company (now known as MWH Global), and developed by Robert Kallman. The invention was conceived to provide Mr. Harza's daughter with relief from lower back pain while seated for prolonged periods of time due to her struggles with cystic fibrosis. A pair of bladders inside the seat base alternately raise and lower the pelvis from left to right to impart a natural walking-like motion to the lower back in order to provide many comfort and health benefits of walking without the need to stand up and walk about.

In my opinion the "Active Comfort" system is hardly such a revolution that it should be included here and in any case there is no reason to elaborate on who the inventor is and why he invented it. Numerous engineering miracles happen each time a new car is invented, I don't see why this one should get such special attention. This paragraph really comes off as an advertisement for Mr. Harza and MWH Global. The exact same paragraph can also be found in the article about the BMW 7 Series.

The I-drive would be much more suitable for inclusion because it has been so controversial. It is however already covered in the article about the BMW 7 Series.Hamstro 16:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hamstro:

I agree that the name of the inventor and development history of the Active seat don't need to be included in this, or any other Series section. The background information was not intended to be an advertisement, and in fact serves no advertising value to Mr. Harza nor to his company. As a retired engineer and builder of many of the world's largest dams, neither his own nor his company's commercial interests are impacted by Wikipedia knowledge of this automotive seating feature. It is only to BMW's benefit to include mention of this innovation, not as advertising but as one of many descriptions of the various features, technologies and innovations available on BMW automobiles. I included the background information because I found it to be a compelling story about the nature of invention and the sort of story not often known by the general public. It was published in an internal company document. Perhaps this is the sort of information one could only find on Wikipedia and part of why this encyclopedia is so special.

It is not granting special attention to include mention of an engineering advance in seating comfort introduced to the automotive industry by BMW. Please note that the Active seat feature was deemed worthy of recognition by Popular Science magazine as one of the best inventions of the year in 1998. Also, the migration of features from the flagship 7 series to the 5 series reveals much about the marketing and development of BMW's technologies. There is no reason to exclude mention that a feature is available on any particular series, and in fact many other feature descriptions are repeated in sections for the various series.

Rather than remove the all mention of the Active seat, you had the option of just removing details about the inventor. If you feel that other BMW features are more deserving of elaboration, then do some research and add information and enhance the knowledge base held within Wikipedia. To completely remove all mention of the Active seat unnecessarily restricted the availability of accurate and detailed information about features available on the 5 Series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.77.25 (talk) 06:44, 1 May 2006

As I stated above it didn't seem noteworthy to me - I haven't seen it mentioned as a technological breakthrough anywhere. Furthermore the elaborate description of how the seat was invented made me think that it was advertising - this is after all an article about the BMW 5 series, not every new feature brought to life along with it.

Because I still wasn't completely sure that it wasn't worth keep, I made the comment on this talk page and waited. After noone came around to comment for a while I decided to remove the information.

I have just looked over the new section in the article about the BMW 7 Series and I like it now. It's short and to the point and as such doesn't stray too far from the main topic of the article.

I suggest that you make a page about the Active Seat and link to it if it is such a technological leap. Verifiable stories about how it was invented would be ideal to put in an article like that. Hamstro (Talk) 20:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hamstro:

Thank you giving consideration to my reasons for including mention of BMW's use of the Active Seat feature. If you are satisfied with the new section in the article, then so am I.

Please understand that I do not consider myself to be an individual arbiter of what is noteworthy. I thought that the Best Invention recognition of the technology by Popular Science magazine supported the notion that it the Active seat is, in fact, noteworthy. In addition, in its first year of introduction in Europe, the Active Seat received widespread acclaim in numerous European newspapers and magazines. The feature was introduced as standard equipment on the 750/760 Series and according to Bloomberg was selected as an option on more than 70% of the 740/745 Series at prices up to $2,500 for drive and front passenger seats. This feature was not treated as a gimmick, but rather as an innovation which provides substantive benefits. BMW advertisements in Forbes and other magazine featured the Active Seat, as did an impressive two-page spread the BMW printed brochures. I know some of the people in Germany involved in this project and know how important this feature was to seating comfort and competion with other auto manufacturers.

Thank you for the suggestion that there be a page about he Active Seat technology. I will ask someone who worked on this project at BMW or Johnson Controls (the other automotive OEM supplier of the device) to write for me a brief account of Mr. Harza's development of the invention prior to its license to BMW.

On a related matter, in case you're interested in the technology, there's a link at the end of this article to the bmwworld website that describes the Active seat's function. Another page is on BMW's 7 Series web pages worldwide and the 5 Series web pages in most countries other that the US.

BMW supplied a 7 Series car that was displayed at an international private and business jet convention to demonstrate the Active seat feature alongside a Gulfsream seat into which the Active seat, (AKA. Aerovit for aviation) was also installed. Although the feature used in aviation is called the Aerovit, Mr. Harza is cited as inventor and the motion is identical to that provided on the BMW.

The technology is marketed by auto and aviation industry leaders as a genuine technology breakthrough that provides a substantive comfort benefit. As someone who has test driven the BMW Active Seat, I can tell you that my lower back and rear-end have never before been so pain-free after a 6 hour drive. When I reached my destination and got out of the car, I was pleasantly surprised to find that I felt none of the pain and stiffness I would normally experience after sitting for so long, Let me add, I'm usually quite stiff and uncomfortable after even just one hour in the same seat. Previously I thought that only standing up and walking would ease the pain, but this Active seat device provided the same walking benefits without the need to get up and leave the seat. I don't know of any other seating product on the market that works to provide the benefits of walking. Thanks again for the idea of an Active Seat page. Please let me know if you learn anything you would like to add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.77.25 (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2006

Please sign your posts by following your edit with four tildes. Nicholas SL Smith^chatter 15:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that The very first E39 BMW 5 Series rolled off the assembly line on June 18, 1996.

Since I own an E39 BMW 523iSE made in April 1996, I have to say I disagree with that statement. It may be that the first one bound for the USA was made on that day I guess. 195.212.29.83 10:26, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to RealOEM.com[[1]] (for the European E39 523i), which is fed by BMW parts databases, the first E39 was produced in Feb 1995. This marks a slight overlap with E34 production, but is not too far a reach. I'll add this. Nicholas SL Smith 01:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The fact box says that assembly is Munich, Germany. This is not correct. Current 5 series are built at BMW's Dingolfing plant. Dingolfing is about 100 KM northeast from Munich. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.142.25.239 (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2007

Shouldn't the 5 series page header contain an image of the most current 5 series model? I like the E39 image (the E39 is by far my favorite 5er ever made, we have two) but it's not appropriate to pick that particular car as an example of a current 5er. Nicholas SL Smith^chatter 15:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Generally the best available image is used for the lead info box. It looks like both the E39 and E60 are of similar quality (the E60 is slightly better lit in my opinion) in this case I agree that we should use the most current model. I will switch it if no one objects. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't object, but this is has been a sensitive issue as of late. I agree with a current image, and would like to give deference to it because image quality can become very subjective when images are of a very similar quality. I by no means wish to offend anyone by judging the quality of images, and a survey doesn't seem appropriate, so let's stick with a current image. Nicholas SL Smith^chatter 23:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The way the page is now, the same image is twice in the article, which is much less helpful than a better variety. Even if you do think the E60 image is better quality (I don't, because of the reflections from the parking lot stripes), I don't know of any other particularly good E60 images to fill that infobox. IFCAR (talk) 23:42, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's also a good point (about the image redundancy), but it is still more helpful than displaying an arbitrary model simply because the image isn't on the page yet. I think we really ought to go out and take a better image (and use it when we take it) -- Nicholas SL Smith^chatter 04:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New model is out, pics are here: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/autoexpressnews/245416/bmws_new_5series.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.0.218 (talk) 00:14, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article states "BMW has decided to only offer 1 4 cylinder engine here: the 520d". Where is "here"? Not clear if it is US, North America, UK...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.196.192.162 (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly the description of the F10 uses 'here' twice without defining where 'here' is. Possibly the USA but it's impossible to tell. 'It is not known what engine BMW will use here for markets outside of Europe due to fuel quality problems, most likely the BMW N52 will continue here.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleystevens (talk • contribs) 20:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the case of the E39, the photo preferred by User:Roguegeek has a less appealing background -- including another car visually "touching" the subject -- and the car looks like it may have been lowered. In the case of the E60 photo, the photo he prefers is low-resolution and very harshly lit.

For the benefit of any users who would like to weigh in, the photos in question:

• 
• 
• 
• 

In the gallery above, the first photo is the one currently in the article as edited by Roguegeek, and the second is the original photo that I feel should be restored. IFCAR (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The 5 Series began the BMW tradition of being named with a three-digit number."

This is a strange statement when one considers:

• the BMW 303 of the early 1930s
• all BMW cars between the 303 and the BMW 335 (1939 – 1941), up to (and into) World War II
• the BMW 501, BMW's first postwar production car
• the BMW 502, 503, and 507, derived from the 501

The use of displacement to name BMWs began with 1955 with the BMW Isetta 250, the use of displacement with codes began with the 3.2 Super in 1957, and the early postwar three-digit number system (different systems were used prewar) ended with the 503 and 507 in 1959. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per the convention of WP:CARPIX to use the best-quality image in the top infobox, based on the series of photography standards spelled out there, this article currently uses a photo of the E60 generation. The photo is especially clean, with minimal distractions on or around the car, and is of the proper 3/4 front view.

An anonymous user prefers a photo of the F10 generation, a photo that is more front-heavy, has other vehicles in the background and is covered with distracting reflections -- clearly not the best available photo of a BMW 5-Series. This user's only justification for the proposed switch is a personal preference for the current generation to appear in the lead infobox, despite WP:CARPIX stating clearly that is not a factor.

I was inclined to treat the user's behavior as vandalism, because there was only one explanation given for a reverted edit (with a personal attack at that), ignoring my own explanations. Posting here is something I clearly should have done sooner, but are there are any other thoughts? IFCAR (talk) 20:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the lead box photo to the current BMW 5 series sedan. I believe the lead box photo should be the current generation without question. The image i have uploaded meets WP:CARPIX standards. The image is clear with a plain background that focuses on the vehicle with little reflections outlining the cars new shape.

I have replaced the main image with a good quality version of the F10 generation as a compromise. I don't think these image battles are worth the effort fighting for as new images get uploaded all the time. OSX (talk • contributions) 12:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The other is better. Someone saying "I believe it should be x" without a legitimate reason is not a precedent I would like to see. IFCAR (talk) 16:28, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That image is nice, but the other image is better as that one has a vehicle in the background. Also I don't mean to get technical here, but that 5er has the shadow line high gloss trim as an option which is not on a standard 5er. The image should be of a high quality stock F10 5 series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobytoblerone (talk • contribs) 20:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The E60 image used previously (File:BMW E60 front 20080515.jpg) is actually quite grainy, and of low quality with shadows over the front of the car. The low resolution of File:F105er.jpg leads me to believe it may be a copyright violation, but I cannot confirm this. It is also very grainy, and has obvious reflections all over the paintwork. Also, if the accessories fitted to the car are factory-fitted, then that is okay. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tobytoblerone, there's no need for any particular generation to be illustrated, but I share your concerns about lack of factory spec and having another car in the background. OSX, I think "low quality" is a great exaggeration to describe the other photo, but I do see the shadow if not the grain. It

It does look like there's another angle of the photo currently in place that doesn't have anything distracting in the background, so if we can establish it's a stock vehicle I'd be okay with that one.

But again, the discussion in such cases should be entirely on the merits of the photograph, not of which generation of car is in the picture. IFCAR (talk) 23:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced the lead infobox image again, using the image that you have suggested for the time being. On my computer, the File:BMW E60 front 20080515.jpg is not very sharp and suffers from graininess. Tobytoblerone says that the paint work of File:BMW 530d (F10) front-1 20100821.jpg and File:BMW 530d (F10) front 20100821.jpg is a high-gloss option. I would assume, this means a factory option, not an aftermarket one.

No i am referring to the black trim around the windows etc. The black trim is a factory option you pay extra for, not on a standard 5 series which is a chrome trim. This image is much better http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BMW_530d_(F10)_front-1_20100821.jpg

Also, I agree that the infobox image does not have to be of the most recent generation, but this is not an opinion shared by all other editors (there are constant debates of this nature). Because you and I, along with other editors are always uploading new images, I don't think it is worth arguing the point if a suitable image exists of the current generation (even if not quite as nice as another image). OSX (talk • contributions) 00:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the low standards many accept as "suitable," I'm more than willing to make use of the consensus we expended so much energy in creating the WP:CARPIX standards. There's just no merit for the personal preference of a particular generation, and as you may have seen on the Lincoln Continental or Buick Roadmaster articles, some users just as vehemently prefer to see older cars for no better reasons. IFCAR (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point accepted. OSX (talk • contributions) 00:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Just_drop_it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.124.15 (talk) 23:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why? --Daniel 19:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IF YOU LIVE IN AUSTRALIA, A CAR WITH 189 INCHES OR MORE IN LENGTH IS CONSIDERED A FULL-SIZE, BUT IF YOU LIVE IN THE UNITED STATES, IT'S A CAR WITH 110 OR MORE INCHES IN WHEELBASE THAT MAKES IT FULL-SIZED. I DO NOT KNOW WHY YOU REVERTED MY EDIT. :LOL: --198.228.216.27 (talk) 04:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BMW 5 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-neil29-2010jan29%2C0%2C3053544.column
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527042442/http://automobile.automotive.com/134160/1004-2011-bmw-535i/index.html to http://automobile.automotive.com/134160/1004-2011-bmw-535i/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW 5 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070716152208/http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/mseries/overview.html to http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/mseries/overview.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW 5 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091123163009/http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/5series/overview.html to http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/5series/overview.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since any awards relate to individual generations, I propose that the Awards section is removed from this article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 00:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Toasted Meter (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kacperlojek (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zmuhl (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bmv sria 5 vit 2011 79.106.66.54 (talk) 05:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]