Talk:Avalanche (P2P)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"This removes the need for each peer to have complex knowledge of block distribution"

Um, I didnt know you had to know how BitTorrent works in order to use it. I just click a .torrent file and it downloads. Wtf. --pile0nades^{talk | contrib} 6 July 2005 01:54 (UTC)

- In this case a peer means the program not the human sitting in front of it... NetworkCoding eases the pain by making it (nearly) not matter what block is sent... 89.59.66.73 21:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Quicksilver[reply]

I just removed this sentence from the last paragraph: 'His response has been criticised, however, for "vernacular, execration and self-aggrandisement".'

I'm no expert on this subject, but such big words really need citations. Has his response been criticized by anoyone else than the user who added this sentence??? Whom?

Google reveals that the statement comes from "Anonymous" in the comment section below the original blog post. It should not be part of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.20.33.211 (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The MSCD link doesn't work. Anyone? Thanks. --Gatolanudo (talk) 01:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avalanche (P2P). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121114125117/http://bramcohen.livejournal.com/20140.html to http://bramcohen.livejournal.com/20140.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]