Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Abigail Fillmore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abigail Fillmore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Abigail Fillmore/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mujinga (talk · contribs) 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Pix

[edit]
  • All three are relevant and appropriately licensed.
  • Not a pass/fail issue but would be optimal to have alt text for accessibility
    •  Done

Copyvio

[edit]
  • Earwig gives nothing and I'll do some spotchecks

Spotchecks

[edit]
  • 5a "As an adult, she taught herself to speak French and to play the piano" bit close to source which says "As an adult she taught herself French and began studying piano" - I know there aren't many words to play with but you could say for example "learnt French"
    •  Done
  • 5b fine
  • 5c fine
  • 5d fine
  • 9a fine
  • 9c fine
  • 9h fine
  • 10b AGF
  • 6i "These plans were interrupted when she caught a cold that progressed into bronchitis and then pneumonia." bit close to source which says "Her cold had developed into bronchitis, and from there progressed to bronchitis" - I think i'd be happy if "progressed" was changed to another word
    •  Done
  • 3h fine
  • 3o fine

References

[edit]
  • Referenced to reliable sources, well laid-out.
  • Inconsistent use of publisher location but that's not a GA pass/fail issue

Prose

[edit]
  • Reads well overall
  • "They moved in with Cyprus Powers" - what relation is Cyrus to them?
    •  Done
  • "While she held fashionable society in contempt, she enjoyed observing their behavior and participating in social parties" - society is singular, so maybe "people's behaviour"
    •  Done
  • " was an active first lady that hosted many social events" - "who hosted"?
    •  Done
  • "she designed the White House interior in the mind of a middle-class home" does "mind" make sense in US-eng? Reads funny to me, I guess I'd say "like" or "in the way of"
    •  Done
  • "As an antebellum first lady, " is antebellum the best word choice? because for me it refers more to Antebellum South, but this might be another US/Br eng thing
    •  Done
  • salon not wikilinked in article
    •  Done
  • lead good

Various

[edit]

Stable, focused, neutral, broad, no OR

Overall

[edit]

I shall take this on for review Mujinga (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few queries related to spotchecks and prose. Please respond on each point so I know if it's done or not. Putting article on hold for a week, let me know if you need longer, but the fixes should be fast - happy to discuss anything Mujinga (talk) 10:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mujinga I think I've addressed everything. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Great job that was very smooth. Good luck with the other First Ladies! Mujinga (talk) 15:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk15:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Thebiguglyalien (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 23:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Abigail Fillmore; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]