Talk:Aces Up

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Board and table games Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Game starts with four cards dealt in a table."

Shouldn't this be "THE game starts with four PILES dealt ON a table? 66.82.9.52 12:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Aces Up (solitaire).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have sources for Aces Up, Firing Squad, Idiot's Delight and Drivel Patience all with these rules. Can anyone supply sources for the other names? Otherwise they should probably be removed. Bermicourt (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The suggestion that this solitaire has an 1 in 10 chance of a win (text) or 1 in 8 (factbox) is ridiculous. One of the source links (http://www.solitairelaboratory.com/acesup.html) gives it a 3 percent chance of success, my gut feeling says it is one in 100. I have not had a win in 40 attempts lately. 31.209.42.240 (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]