Talk:A Question of Europe

A Question of Europe has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 14, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from A Question of Europe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that future government minister Alistair Burt attended the A Question of Europe debate wearing a beret, a striped shirt, and a string of onions? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Question of Europe.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

European Union Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. University of Oxford Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Question of Europe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "were asked" → "was asked" (since it's a group)

Think this might be an WP:ENGVAR thing, in British English collective nouns can be singular or plural depending on the context. It's covered a little in our article American_and_British_English_grammatical_differences#Subject-verb_agreement. This one sounds right to me as it is (I am British), though I understand we are inconsistent about how we apply it. I've added a British English tag to the article - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "of European" → "of the European"

Done - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "audience were" → "audience was" (also a group)

As previous on collective nouns - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Add a comma after "after the debate".

Done - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Add a comma after "Monetary Union".

Done - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "dinner dress" → "dinner dresses"

Possibly another British English thing. One wears "dinner dress" (referring to a class of outfits including black tie for men and evening gowns for ladies), not "a dinner dress" - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "afterwards" → "afterward"

Another ENGVAR thing, "afterwards" is more common in Britain but has the same meaning as "afterward". See for example the Cambridge or Collins dictionary entries - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Couldn't find any issues here.

• Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).

Done via the bot (hopefully worked OK, it's the first time I've used it!). Many thanks for letting me know this, it is very useful - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• A reference (currently #7), has an error with its title.
• There are no issues with the images and they have fair-use rationales.
• Also try linking each website in every citation.

Many thanks for the review Some Dude From North Carolina, much appreciated. Hopefully I've addressed your comments above apart from the referencing. I've since lost access to the newspaper archives that I used when writing this but I've asked if anyone has access to the articles over at the Resource Exchange (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#British_Newspaper_Archive) and then then tidy up the three offline citations - Dumelow (talk) 09:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dumelow: Thanks for the comments! There really is a lot of differences between the way we speak and write the same language. Well, it's always better to know. That being said, everything else in the article is in great shape, but the reference after "11:50 pm" is missing a title, and as a result, I'm seeing a "Missing or empty |title= (help)" warning on my screen. Try fixing it, and ping me when you reply. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina, hopefully I've sorted it now - Dumelow (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Hello everyone,

I've done the french tanslation from this article and I would like to know if a link to the debate's archive video exists ? By the way, according to this page, the TV show was produced by Philip S. Gilbert and edited by Michael Townson.

Greetings from France. --TaupeGun (talk) 03:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TaupeGun, my French is passable at best but your article looks great to me. Good spot on the editor and producer credits from Radio Times, I'll add those to this article. I see someone has posted the original programme on YouTube here. In watching it, I noticed an error in the article: it was Thorpe, not Heath, that asked if Castle would resign; I've corrected that here but not on the French article - Dumelow (talk) 06:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dumelow: It's really nice, thank you very much ! --TaupeGun (talk) 14:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]