Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates

This is the talk page for discussing the Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates Wikipedia page

Archives

Feb 2004–Nov 2004 • Nov 2004–Jun 2005 Jun 2005–Nov 2005 • Nov 2005–Dec 2005 Dec 2005–Feb 2006 • Feb 2006–Mar 2006 Mar 2006–Apr 2006 • Apr 2006–Apr 2006 Apr 2006–July 2006 • Jul 2006–Aug 2006 Aug 2006–Nov 2006 • Nov 2006–Mar 2007 Mar 2007–Aug 2007 • Aug 2007–Oct 2007 Oct 2007–Jan 2008 • Jan 2008–Feb 2008 Feb 2008–May 2008 • May 2008–Oct 2008 Oct 2008–Feb 2009 • Feb 2009–Mar 2009 Mar 2009–Jun 2009 • Jun 2009–Jul 2009 Aug 2009–Sep 2009 • Oct 2009–Oct 2009 Nov 2009–Nov 2009 • Dec 2009–Dec 2009 Jan 2010–Feb 2010 • Mar 2010–Apr 2010 May 2010–May 2010 • Jun 2010–Jul 2010 Aug 2010–Jan 2012 • Mar 2011–Apr 2012 Apr 2012–Jan 2013 • Jan 2013–Apr 2013 Apr 2013–Oct 2014 • Nov 2014–Jan 2019 Feb 2019–

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Can you nominate your own image? TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer: Yes, you can nominate your own images. However, they must be under a comparable license. For more info, see WP:FP?. _ZZ^Z'S 02:20, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all

We appear to have two FPs for the Gibson's albatross in flight – File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A4153.jpg and File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A8124.jpg. They look slightly different to me too, although I'm no expert... Could they be male and female? No idea. The former one is no longer used in the article... Please advise on what should happen here?  — Amakuru (talk) 10:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I nominated the second FP, I didn't notice (forgot) the first FP. I think we should delist one of them. I don't have a preference and would support delisting either one. Pinging the other nominator @MER-C:. One image shows more of the feathers, the other is in the infobox, so it's a tie as far as I am concerned. Bammesk (talk) 15:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They're still both used in at least one article. Doing nothing is acceptable. MER-C 16:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. Bammesk (talk) 17:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure whether to raise this on the English Wikipedia or Commons. Anyway

• File:Swanston and Flinders St intersection 1927.jpg was successfully nominated as a featured picture in 2006
• this picture has resolution of 1,115 × 885 pixels
• as time passed by better resolutions of the same image have become available, its now 2024
• I searched through the many pictures that Public Records office of Victoria holds looking for a better resolution version and found several copies of the same image
• I found one that is better resolution (6,000 × 4,344 pixels, picture B) but shows that the featured picture had the cathedral cropped https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/c9/20240706153615%21Swanston_and_Flinders_St_intersection_1927.jpg
• I found one that is even better resolution but has a crack (its a glass plate) (11,716 × 8,608 pixels, picture C) and also shows the cathedral https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/c9/20240706153811%21Swanston_and_Flinders_St_intersection_1927.jpg
• Not sure what to do as:
  • The picture in its original form was nominated successfully as a featured picture.
  • Picture B is better resolution so you could argue it is a minor change but it includes the cathedral.
  • Picture C is even better resolution but has an obvious crack in it and the cathedral.

If there was no crack and no cropping of the cathedral then the answer would be C. Alternatively if there was originally no cropping of the cathedral then the answer would be B. Any clues as to what should be done?

P.S. Zoom in on the pictures, there is a lot of fascinating detail. Alex Sims (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Alex Sims, the best version is This. It needs restoration. The crack can be removed, and the borders should be removed. Then we can do a "delist and replace" nomination. That's the norm in situations like this. Bammesk (talk) 03:52, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Removing the crack I think is beyond me. I can see the crack is clean and somehow the irregular shaped piece needs to be moved a bit closer to close the crack. Where can I appeal for someone with more skills and expertise to make this repair? Alex Sims (talk) 02:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editors at Commons:Help desk or at WP:GL/PHOTO might be willing to do it. Some editors at WP:FPC can do it too (including me), and they visit this talk page occasionally. I am not inclined to restore this image myself. Generally I don't do restorations by request. FYI, sometimes restorations can be daunting and time consuming chores. Bammesk (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen some people talking about "EV". What is it? Mittzy (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This should answer your question. _ZZ^Z'S 23:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A photograph (File:Lincoln, NE EF3 tornado.jpg) has been nominated for deletion on the Wikimedia Commons. I am not sure what the procedure is, so I am mentioning it here. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]