Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 14

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Unit plural discussion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer needed because the discussion it mentions is from years ago. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep pending a valid deletion reason. This is a normal WikiProject notice, noting that the WikiProject in question is defunct. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @Jonesey95: It's not a WikiProject notice; It was a talk page notice about a discussion from 2017. As for a deletion reason, although it has transclusions, it's entirely blank and has been for two weeks, so it's functionally unused and pointless because the discussion is over. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 07:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, I misinterpreted the page when I went to one of the talk pages. Delete this blank, expired notice linking to a discussion that ran its course. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I blanked the template a couple weeks ago, because it had text in it saying it could be blanked once the discussion it pointed to was closed. That discussion closed years ago; there is no further need for the template. --Srleffler (talk) 02:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userify to User:CX Zoom/United States House of Representatives elections imagemap. (non-admin closure) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:United States House of Representatives elections imagemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and doesn't display the map it intends to show. But a map of the election results is already featured on respective House of Representative articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I was trying to make a 'clickable map' that resembles the infobox maps on Presidential election pages, and was waiting until redistricting process for the 2022 cycle is completed which might end sometime mid-2022. Though my request is to not delete, I wouldn't oppose deletion if the greater consensus is to delete. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 17:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• move to userspace since the author wishes to continue working on it. Frietjes (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Country data Ottoman Empire old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not an actual country data template. One already exists for the Ottoman Empire. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, malformed. Frietjes (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:IPE Aeronaves Aircraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of Template:IPE Aeronaves. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Caribbean Canadian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant as navboxes for the respective diaspora communities have the same articles in this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Qliphoth (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and the sidebar for the main topic as well as the category connects all the links in this template already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NXT United Kingdom Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 4 entries, unnecessary for a nav box — Czello 20:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NXT UK Women's Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only four entries, not necessary for a nav box — Czello 20:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CS Mioveni seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused and has only redlinks. The blue links seasons at CS Mioveni link to individual seasons in leagues, not to this team. Therefore, this template isn't needed yet as there are no bluelink articles. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete templates are to navigate between blue links, template not needed if all redlinks. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unused. GiantSnowman 18:52, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:DMT color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The color values are already present at Module:Adjacent stations/DTRO and usages should be replaced with {{Rail color|DTRO|1}}, {{Rail color|DTRO|2}} or {{Rail color|DTRO|3}}. Gonnym (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, now replaced. Frietjes (talk) 20:08, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NBL Coaches 2019-20 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Probably should be substituted on a relevant article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only place it could go is 2019–20 NBL season so it could be placed there and see if it survives. Gonnym (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the table on 2019–20 NBL season, which list the coaches' names but not all the extra stats, is much more appropriate for a sports season article. This is not useful, because it violates WP:NOTSTATS. So no point trying to subst it somewhere, just delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Joseph2302. Gonnym (talk) 13:44, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:July 2013 beirut bombing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a real template. Probably was a test. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete via G2. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not a valid template, probably a speedy criteria like G2 applies too. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Union councils of Magura District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nothing but red links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Rus Despatch Rugby Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. No mainspace article for it to be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as creator, I think I created this in error and forget to speedy. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Linescore Soccer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no incoming links, no categories, no documentation. Only substantive edit was creation in 2007. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lifespan of each President of India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused timeline chart. Not really a subject that can be used or contains any vital information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral — I created this, and I am neutral on its deletion. It was created during my early Wikipedia days for a page which got deleted a few months ago. No strong feelings either side, but I think this may be useful if added in the 'Statistics' section of List of presidents of India. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or subst to List of presidents of India and let it survive on its own. Gonnym (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Human rights in Asia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the Asia topic template that already includes the same links and transcluded across multiple articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, redundant to {{Asia topic|prefix=Human rights in}}. Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:South Omaha (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant as all articles are related to the city of Omaha with respective navboxes. A navbox for the neighborhood isn't necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, largely overlaps the main Omaha navbox. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CO lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:CO stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:DJET lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:DLRT lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:DMT lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:DMT stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Dulles AeroTrain stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:EBx-BY lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ERRS HLBS lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:ERRS HLBS stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:F Liner color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:F Liner lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:F Liner stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Ferrocarril Suburbano color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Ferrocarril Suburbano lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Ferrocarril Suburbano stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:FGW lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:FGW stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Gautrain lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:GLink stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Guangzhou Metro lines/line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Guangzhou Metro lines/list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Izuhakone color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Izuhakone lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LACMTA lines/branches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lahore Metro lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lahore Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lahore Metro style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LahoreMetrobus stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LOM-Treno regionale lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:LOM-Treno regionale stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lviv Railways stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Malpensa Express lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Malpensa Express stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MARTA lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MARTA style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mexico City Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Monterrey Metro lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Monterrey Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MRB-RP lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MTS lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MŽ lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:MŽ stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:OT lines/branches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Pune Metro stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:RapidKL BRT lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Rostock S-Bahn color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:RZhD lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SE-TH color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SE-TH lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SeattleMonorail lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SeattleMonorail stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SMS lines/branches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SunRail stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SunRail lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SunRail color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Taichung lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Taichung stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tama Toshi Monorail lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tama Toshi Monorail stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:TH&B lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:THSR lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:TWR color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:TWR lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UP color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UP stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:VBB lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:VBB stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Venice-Simplon Orient Express stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WMSR lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:WMSR stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced and orphaned as part of the migration to {{Adjacent stations}}. If one or more of these templates has been nominated in error because its name is similar to the train color/lines/stations templates, I will be happy to remove it from this nomination. If any of these templates were created with the intention of using them but editors haven't gotten around to it yet, {{Adjacent stations}} should be used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. Gonnym (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete all Frietjes (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Jonesey95, you missed MARTA lines when merging into the batch, but I added it back. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 21. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Disrupted_discussion (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2020 Australian Paralympic Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and malformed. Doesn't include any notable teams as none of the teams were selected. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there are existing templates for Australian (and other countries') teams for specific sports at the 2020 Summer Paralympics e.g. Template:2020 Summer Paralympics Australia men's wheelchair basketball team roster, Template:Australia FH Squad 2020 Summer Olympics. No need for a template of every Australian competitor at the Games, even if the template was functioning. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Composition bar original (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Only edit is creation in 2017. Appears to be an abandoned experiment related to the widely used {{Composition bar}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User security (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no incoming links, no categories. This may have some hypothetical utility, but it has existed for 14 years and nobody is using it, so it can probably be deleted without causing any trouble. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Lang-hin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not used; misapplies ISO 639-3 language tag hin to Hindustani language (which does not have an ISO 639 language tag). Trappist the monk (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cambrian nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Carboniferous nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cretaceous nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cretaceous epoch nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Devonian nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Devonian epoch nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Carboniferous nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mesozoic nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Ordovician nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Silurian nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Silurian epoch nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above templates are all unused and have been replaced with Template:geological category see also for navigation. See also recently closed related TfD. Gonnym (talk) 12:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all: unused and deprecated. — hike395 (talk) 03:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Taiwan 2018 Referendum Results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as 2018 Taiwanese referendum uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 10:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Fnote4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fnote2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused (and really unnecessary) templates that link to a project page. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Palmer United Party/meta/shading (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Australian shading template. Gonnym (talk) 09:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:USTimeZoneTemplates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

TfD accompanies Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 December 14#Category:Time Zone Intrastate Broadcast templates. This template is a flat list with 9 of the 10 categories for deletion in the linked discussion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User bureaucrat since/Exp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Orphaned subtemplate. This function is performed in the parent template natively. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Category cancer survivors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. Also, it is not clear to me that this template could be applied to any categories. I see "deaths" but do not see "survivor" categories in Category:Cancer. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Jonesey95. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User Ukulele-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. Content is just a single word. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User USM Alger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Content is just a single wikilink. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not to be used, superseded by other. Q28 (talk) 06:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:07, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User Info Card 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Note that despite the name, this is not a userbox. Created in 2017, with only maintenance edits by gnomes since then. A maintenance burden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 10:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Administrator review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used since 2017. Q28 (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per previous discussion. Has historical relevance and it may come back into use with the new WP:XRV. Would not be opposed to moving it to the Wikipedia namespace as an alternative to keeping or deleting. Anarchyte (talk) 06:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Anarchyte. I don't see a reason to move it to Wikipedia-namespace either, Template-namespace is the correct place for all templates, no matter on which pages they are used. Regards SoWhy 07:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Q28 (talk) 05:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Editor review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used since 2017. Q28 (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User Chandigarh Wikipedians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. This page may have been intended for use at Category:Chandigarhi Wikipedians or a related page, but those category pages have gotten along fine without this malformed mix of stuff since its creation in 2013. Not that despite its name, this is not a userbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User CurrentSwedishMilitaryRanks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:User SwedishMilitaryRanks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:User Swedish military units (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Content already exists in a slightly different form at Military ranks of the Swedish Armed Forces and Swedish Army, so these templates do not appear to be usable. Note that despite their names, these are not userboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:User English pronunciation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Only edits were three edits to create it in 2013. Despite the name, it is not a userbox. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Guardian Footballers Best In The World (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Duplicate of {{Guardian Best Male Footballers In The World}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as duplicate. Not convinced we need the original template, but we definitely don't need an unused duplicate of it. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - both versions created by same user, so I suspect this was their ignorant attempt at a 'move'. The duplicate is certainly not needed, and I don't think the original is either. Would be happy for both to be deleted to be honest. Thoughts @Jonesey95 and Joseph2302:? GiantSnowman 22:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Maybe I misunderstand the question, but {{Guardian Best Male Footballers In The World}} (note "Male" in the name) is transcluded in five articles, so if you want to delete it, you'd have to come up with a valid rationale. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Falls under Fancruft. This is navbox for a website ranking not an actual reward in the world of Football/Soccer. I've nominated the template it duplicates per the Fancruft rational for December 15. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Red link only (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RANJFS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no categories, no incoming links, no wikicode. Template had just one transclusion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 24, where I have substed it. Template was created by a now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Short description/long (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. This functionality appears to be directly implemented in {{Short description}}, so we probably do not need this dedicated subtemplate. Template created by now-indef-blocked editor. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/class (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tropical_cyclones/Archive_47#Proposal_#2, WikiProject Non-tropical storms is now Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Non-tropical storms task force. The class for Non-tropical storms is now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Non-tropical storms task force/Assessment. I think this can be deleted as the WikiProject is now a task force, but I want to be 100% sure. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect I'd say this should be redirected to the current Assessment subpage or at least history merged. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• history merge with Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Non-tropical storms task force/Assessment. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FC Ripensia Timișoara seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is full of redlinks and is currently not used in any article. The season links at FC Ripensia Timișoara are to the league seasons, not individual seasons for FC Ripensia Timișoara. Therefore, I don't think this template is needed until enough blue links are made. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the purpose of a template is to navigate between blue links. No blue links exist, so template is pointless. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 21:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 21:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:56, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/CCF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/CCF/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Conservative (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Independents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Independents/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Labour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Labour/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberal/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Maverick (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Natural Law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/NDP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Canadian politics/party colours/NDP/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This set of Canadian political party templates appears to have been migrated to {{Canadian party colour}}, which is used in 15,000 articles. Each of these templates has between 0 and 40 leftover transclusions in User, Wikipedia, and Talk spaces. I recommend that this set of templates, which is essentially defunct, be substed, or replaced by the actual maintained template, as appropriate for each transclusion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete. Though now that we have a centralized module, I would like to see {{Canadian party colour}} itself use it instead of holding its own data. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

substitute and delete any uses in talk pages, user pages, etc. all the article-space uses have already been replaced. Frietjes (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:KS lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:KS color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:KS style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced as part of the migration to {{Adjacent stations}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).