Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red kite feeding in Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Red kite#Observation. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Red kite feeding in Wales

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having initially reviewed for a merge into the main red kite article, I propose that this article should be deleted as all information of note is covered in the 'Observation' section of the aforementioned main article. The information here contains a significant amount of original research and relies on primary bare references. Mountain^cirque 12:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as in, port over one or two of the refs to Red kite#Observation, discard the rest of the article. A couple of primary refs is acceptable, particularly if the subject matter isn't controversial stuff.--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Elmidae, The bare refs might be useful someday and keeping the link blue will minimize drama of a clickbait redlink. Montanabw^(talk) 07:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.