Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanent (Joy Division album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 17:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Permanent (Joy Division album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Come on; is this article on an insubstantial greatest hits album ever going to amount to anything? I say just delete articles like this. Lachlan Foley 08:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Joy Division discography. I think this can be adequately summarised there. --Michig (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:BEFORE and footnote refs in article. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, charting album. Nomination sounds suspiciously like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep as pointed out by In ictu oculi, the footnotes demonstrate significant coverage. J04n(talk page) 15:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.