Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly's of Cornwall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SNOW keep as a withdrawal by nominator and closed IAR by him. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly's of Cornwall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically fleeting mentions in really weak local or barely reliable sources. Yes, we've all seen the TV ad (::groan) but not all companies with a TV ad get a Wikipedia article. And a mini demo in Westminster doesn't do it either. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep per a news search which you should have done per WP:BEFORE, article was already redlinked from List of ice cream brands which is why I decided to expand it. I have not finished writing this article yet, give me a chance. @Dr. Blofeld:, @Cassianto:, @Sagaciousphil:, can you help? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:09, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep So notable I regularly choose this brand ;-)♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A Google news search shows plenty of coverage, in many of Britain's national newspapers, which is supplemented by significant regional coverage. As a result, passes WP:GNG. Joseph2302 11:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 11:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 11:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 11:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 11:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A news search shows a number of references in reliable sources - both local and national UK press reports, which make it pass GNG. - SchroCat (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Argubaly a notable food. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 12:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- We have Rossi's, so why not this? Notable company for the area. I can't think why the nominator would want to delete this when they must be aware that it is going through the expansion stage? Still, it's easier to delete it than to actually help out in the research of it, isn't it? Cassianto ^Talk 12:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets the notability guide; looks as if it's possible to expand about the earlier company history too. SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Appears to be notable, I'm surprised that it didn't have an article before today! Good work Ritchie333. On that note, I'm just going to nip round the corner and get some! :) Jeni ^(talk) 14:32, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I may join in you in that (well, in the activity of getting the ice cream, probably not from the same shop!) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:22, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable from a Google news search, as echoed for many above. Also, a trout for making me miss my Cornish homeland -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 19:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.