Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hispanophile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hispanophile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub's citations consist solely of three dictionaries' entries on this term. Of those three dictionaries, two have apparently deleted their entries. Searching online results in dictionary entries and mirror sites. Wiktionary already has an entry on this term, and even there it lacks sources and attestations. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor is it a database of non-notable neologisms. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: All of the citations verify only the definition, leaving the section that lists the people who are allegedly Hispanophiles entirely unsourced. I have removed the one BLP there. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don’t think there are known scholarly articles to substantiate it.Trillfendi (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above Spiderone 12:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.