Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Newton Abbot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Newton Abbot. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Newton Abbot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The flag of a town of 25,000 people--a flag that is a very recent invention without historic significance--is in appropriate for an article DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:50, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the article on Newton Abbot. The article on the town already has a picture of the flag and information on the flag probably belongs there. Vorbee (talk) 09:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & redirect , already added content to the town article. Renata (talk) 22:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Newton Abbot - Not independently notable, but the flag is mentioned at the town article. Hog Farm (talk) 04:05, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
'Merge with the main Newton Abbot seems to be the obvious way to go. I would agree with the view that the flag in itself is not notable enough to have an article, but it is of relevance to Newton Abbot and so details can be added there. Dunarc (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The lack of newspaper reported sources (even from local ones) which I'd expect for such a recently created flag are lacking so I would have to say merge until such time as appropriate sources are found. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.