Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurasian times

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasian times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NNEWSPAPER and WP:NWEB. The references mention the platform but there is no significant coverage that describes anything about it. CNMall41 (talk) 04:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It does not seem to meet either WP:NNEWSPAPER or WP:NWEB. Other media outlets report stories from the Eurasian Times, as referenced in the article, but they seem to be republishing rather than critiquing. There are many citations in academic and scholarly works for a publication called 'Eurasian Times', but they are for a 1920s journal called "Evraziiskii Vremennik", of which 'Eurasian Times' is a translation. That 1920s publication would meet WP:NNEWSPAPER, but this new Eurasian Times does not, yet (WP:TOOSOON). RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 14:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.